Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kushal Sachdeva vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 3629/2017 KUSHAL SACHDEVA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Gaurav Kumar Bansal, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Subhash, P.S. R.K. Puram. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 2.3. 4. ORDER0709.2017 % Notice. Learned APP for the State, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She is present in court and accepts notice. She is duly identified by IO SI Subhash. The petitioner has approached this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.0081/2017, registered on 21.03.2017 against him with Police Station R.K. Puram, Delhi, under Sections 354D/506/509 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. It is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 were engaged to get married on 4th December, 2016. Thereaft...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd vs.subhash Chander Allahbad & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~12 to 14 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 424/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. C.K.Gola, Advocate versus USHA RANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Adv. for R-1. + MAC.APP. 454/2015 and CM APPL.5256/2016 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Adv. ..... Appellant versus USHA RANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Adv. for R-1. Mr. C.K.Gola, Advocate for R-4. + MAC.APP. 455/2015 and CM APPL.5255/2016 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Adv. ..... Appellant versus SUBHASH CHANDER ALLAHBAD & ORS MAC Appeal No.424/2015 etc. Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Adv. for R-1. Mr. C.K.Gola, Advocate for R-4. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 21.01.2009 Subh...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.usha Rani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~15 to 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 540/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus DILRAJ KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 to 5 + MAC.APP. 58/2016 DILRAJ KAUR & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus RELIANCE GENERAL INS CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 984/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus NEELAM KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC A Nos. 540/15, 58/16, 984/15, 53/16, 10& 6Page 1 of 10 Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 & 2 + MAC.APP. 53/2016 NEELAM KAUR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus SATISH KUMAR YADAV & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amol N. Suryavanshi, Adv for R-3 /insurance company + MAC.APP. 1029/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ........
Manjeet Singh Malhotra & Anr. Vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~R-172 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL852010 and CM Nos.2666-2668/2010 MANJEET SINGH MALHOTRA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: None versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nanita Sharma, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Ranjeet Kaur, aged about 40 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 08.07.2005 at Mehrauli Bus Terminal, New Delhi, involving negligent driving of a bus bearing registration no.DL-1PA-6282, which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the first respondent (insurer) for the period in question and died in the consequence. The appellants, they being husband and son respectively of the deceased (collectively, the claimants), instituted accident claim case (petition no.381/2006) on 07.09.2006 seeking compensation impleading besides the insurer, the driver and registered owner of the bus as party respond...
Comite Interprofessionnel Du Vin De Champagne vs.m/s Chinar Agro Fruit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~48 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:07. 09.2017 CS(COMM) 1194/2016 COMITE INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU VIN DE CHAMPAGNE M/S CHINAR AGRO FRUIT PRODUCTS versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendant Advocates who appeared in the case: For the Plaintiff: For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Taapsi Johri, Advocate. Nemo (Defendant is ex parte) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0709.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) CS(COMM) 1194/2016 1. The Plaintiff has filed this Suit for infringement of Geographical Indication Under Section 22 of The Geographical Indications Of Goods (Registration And Protection) Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the GI Act) for restraining the Defendant from committing, inter-alia, acts of infringement of the Plaintiffs registered geographical indication CHAMPAGNE by using the name CHAMPAGNE in respect of non-alcoholic sparkling drinks. CS(COMM) 1194/2016 Page 1 of 14 2. Defendant has been served with the summons of the suit. None had a...
Kuldeep Rana vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:07. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 11340/2015, C.M. APPL.29785/2015 KULDEEP RANA ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Rajesh Gupta, Sh. Harpreet Singh and Sh. M.C. Verma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for UOI. Sh. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Sh. Arjun Pant, Advocate, for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The petitioner in these proceedings seeks quashing of notifications acquiring 1 bigha in Khasra No.57//2018 , situated in Pul Pehladpur. It is stated that the acquisition of the said lands (hereafter suit lands) lapsed by reason of operation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereafter 2013 Act).2. The facts of the case are that on 27.10.1999, a notification under Section 4 of...
Vikram Bakshi vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C. No.2493/2017 VIKRAM BAKSHI ....... Petitioner Through: Mr.Nikhil Ahuja, Ms.Rudrani Tyagi, Advs. Versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP. ......Respondents Inspector Shambhu Nath, PS EOW Mr.Deepak Khosla, R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % ORDER C. HARI SHANKAR, J.07.09.2017 1. This order disposes of a preliminary objection, raised by respondent No.2 in the present proceedings, regarding the maintainability of this petition (Crl.M.C. 2493/2017) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as the Cr PC).2. Exhaustive arguments, by Ms Rebecca John and Mr Kirti Uppal, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on the question of issuance of notice and grant of interim relief, in the present petition, were heard by me. Before they were completed, Mr Khosla (Mr. Deepak Khosla) raised a preliminary objection, to the Crl.M.C. No.2493/2017 Page 1 of 56 ef...
Pnb Housing Finance Limited vs.rajesh Kumar Mangla & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 09.2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 251/2017 PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED versus RAJESH KUMAR MANGLA & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........... Petitioner ..Respondents For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. : None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0709.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The respondents have been served. None appears for the respondents.3. The petitioner is a finance company rendering financial/credit facilities in the form of loans. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 251/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents had approached the petitioner for seeking financial assistance for purchase of properties bearing Nos. (i) 303,3, Tower J1, Exquisite Nirvana Country 2, Sohna Road, Gurgaon-122001 and (ii) 203,2, T...
Rakesh Kumar & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2583/2017 RAKESH KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with ASI Devender Kumar, P.S. Uttam Nagar, Delhi Mr. R.K. Solanki, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 2.3. ORDER0709.2017 % Notice. Learned ASC for the State, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She is present in court and accepts notice. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO ASI Devender Kumar. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.467/2011, registered on 03.10.2011 against them with Police Station Uttam Nagar, West D...
Mcd & Anr. Vs.punia & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~R-170 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Decided on:7. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 81/2010 and CM APPL.2598-2599/2010 MCD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mrs. Biji Rajesh, Advocate for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate versus PUNIA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. Accident claim case (Suit No.537/1999, new No.42/2000) was instituted on 19.08.1999 by first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants) seeking compensation on the averments that Chhaju Ram, the husband of the first respondent and father of the other respondents, had died in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 09.02.1999 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as water tanker bearing registration No.DL-1LB-5348 (tanker). The tanker admittedly is registered in the name of the first appellant, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), and was concededly driven during the relevant period by second appellant Ved Prakash (the driver...
- ‹ Prev
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- Next ›
- Last »