Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kushal Sachdeva vs.state & Anr

Kushal Sachdeva vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 07, 2017
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1208708

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kushal Sachdeva

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....% notice. learned app for the state, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice. notice to respondent no.2 also. she is present in court and accepts notice. she is duly identified by io si subhash. the petitioner has approached this court under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short ‘cr.pc’) for quashing of the fir bearing no.0081/2017, registered on 21.03.2017 against him with police station r.k. puram, delhi, under sections 354d/506/509 ipc on the complaint of respondent no.2. it is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent no.2 were engaged to get married on 4th december, 2016. thereafter, they continued to meet but due to temperamental differences between the petitioner and the respondent no.2, they could not reconcile with each crl.m.c. no.3629/2017 page 1 of 2 5.6. 7.8. 9. other. consequently, on the complaint of the respondent no.2 the said fir was registered against the petitioner. both the parties appeared before the delhi govt. mediation and conciliation centre, new delhi-110016. on 24th may, 2017 they had amicably resolved and settled all their disputes. the terms and conditions of the settlement were reduced to writing. copy of the settlement dated 24th may, 2017 is placed on record. the petitioner and respondent no.2 confirms the mediation settlement dated 24th may, 2017. the respondent no.2 states that she has voluntarily settled and resolved all her disputes with the petitioner without any force and coercion. she further submits that in view of the said settlement she does not want to pursue the said fir. she submits that the said fir may be quashed. learned asc through io submits that the charge sheet has so far not been filed against the petitioner. since the parties have amicably settled their all disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing the said fir bearing no.0081/2017, registered on 21.03.2017 with police station r.k. puram, delhi, under sections 354d/506/509 ipc and proceedings.....

Full Judgment

$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 3629/2017 KUSHAL SACHDEVA ........ Petitioner

Through Mr. Gaurav Kumar Bansal, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Subhash, P.S. R.K. Puram. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 2.

3. 4. ORDER

0709.2017 % Notice. Learned APP for the State, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She is present in court and accepts notice. She is duly identified by IO SI Subhash. The petitioner has approached this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.PC’) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.0081/2017, registered on 21.03.2017 against him with Police Station R.K. Puram, Delhi, under Sections 354D/506/509 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. It is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 were engaged to get married on 4th December, 2016. Thereafter, they continued to meet but due to temperamental differences between the petitioner and the respondent No.2, they could not reconcile with each Crl.M.C. No.3629/2017 Page 1 of 2 5.

6. 7.

8. 9. other. Consequently, on the complaint of the respondent No.2 the said FIR was registered against the petitioner. Both the parties appeared before the Delhi Govt. Mediation and Conciliation Centre, New Delhi-110016. On 24th May, 2017 they had amicably resolved and settled all their disputes. The terms and conditions of the settlement were reduced to writing. Copy of the settlement dated 24th May, 2017 is placed on record. The petitioner and respondent No.2 confirms the mediation settlement dated 24th May, 2017. The respondent No.2 states that she has voluntarily settled and resolved all her disputes with the petitioner without any force and coercion. She further submits that in view of the said settlement she does not want to pursue the said FIR. She submits that the said FIR may be quashed. Learned ASC through IO submits that the charge sheet has so far not been filed against the petitioner. Since the parties have amicably settled their all disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing the said FIR bearing No.0081/2017, registered on 21.03.2017 with Police Station R.K. Puram, Delhi, under Sections 354D/506/509 IPC and proceedings arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

10. 11. DASTI. SEPTEMBER07 2017/jitender VINOD GOEL, J.

Crl.M.C. No.3629/2017 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial