Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
mohd.hanif vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :31. t JULY , 2017 W.P.(C) 5931/2016 & CM APPL. 24476/2016 MOHD.HANIF ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.B.S.Maan, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through : Ms.Astha Tyagi, Advocate with Ms.Sujatha Bagadhi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr.Ameet Singh, Advocate with Mr.Srinivas, Advocate for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner claims himself to be recorded owner of the agricultural land to the extent of share of Khasra Nos.3(1-8), 3(0-9), 3(0-18), 3(0-16), 3(3-0), 3(0-14), 3(0-5) and 3(0-1) total admeasuring 7 bighas and 11 biswas in the Revenue Estate of Village Satbari, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as suit land). The petitioners claim is that acquisition of suit land has lapsed by virtue of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilita...
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd & Anr. Vs.madhu Sharma & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~13 & R-46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.481/2008 MADHU SHARMA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. J.M. Kalia & Ms. Bhawana versus Garg, Advs. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-1. + MAC APPEAL No.417/2008 ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus MADHU SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.M. Kalia & Ms. Bhawana Garg, Advs. for respondents/claimants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Surinder Sharma, 42 years old, working for gain as partner in firm styled as M/s Surinder Kumar and Bros. (Engineer & Govt. Contractor), suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that MAC Appeal No.481 & 417 of 2008 Page 1 of 7 occurred on 10.12.2004, involving negligent driving of Indica car bearing registration No.DL3W2846 which was admittedly insured against third party risk with M/...
Indian Council of Agricultural Research & Anr. Vs.shri Laxmi Narayan M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.4431/2014 and CM No.8855/2014 + Reserved on :5. h July, 2017 Date of Decision:31. t July, 2017 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ANR. Through Mr.Gagan Mathur & Mr.Varun Kumar, Advocates. ..... Appellants versus SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN MEENA Through Mr.Chittaranjan Hati, Advocate ..... Respondent WITH WP(C) No.4578/2014 & CM No.9119/2014 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ANR. Through Mr.Gagan Mathur & Mr.Varun Kumar, Advocates. ..... Appellants versus RAM RATTAN SINGH & ORS. Through Mr.Chittaranjan Hati, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS WP(C) No.6682/2014 & CM No.15862/2014 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL WP (C) Nos.4431/14, 4578/14, 66&Page 1 of 16 RESEARCH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mr.Gagan Mathur & Mr.Varun Kumar, Advocates. versus SURESH RAI Through Mr.Shanker Raju & Mr.Nilansh Gaur, Advocates ..... Respondent WP(C) No.1/2015 & CM No.7/2015 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ANR. Through Mr.Gagan Mathur & Mr...
Narendra Singh vs.bureau of Indian Standards Through: The Director Gen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: July 25, 2017 Judgment delivered on: July 31, 2017 + W.P.(C) 9262/2016, CM No.37410/2016 NARENDRA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Charu Ambwani & Mr. Anshul Rai, Advs. versus BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS THROUGH: THE DIRECTOR GENERAL & ANR Through: Mr. B.K. Sood, Mr. Sandeep Thukral & Mr. Harish Gaur, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"In the above mentioned facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to pass appropriate orders: a) Issue an order, direction in the nature of writ by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India so as to set aside and quash the impugned order of transferred issued by the respondent no.2 vide memorandum dated 30.8.2016 as it is violative of Clause 6.1 of the ...
Ramdhari Devi vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 8664/2016 RAMDHARI DEVI Date of Judgment:31. t July, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vivek Sharma, Adv. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Reema Khorana, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Sidhartha Shankar Ray, Adv. for R-2 along with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Kalkaji, in person. Mr.S.N.Choudhri, Adv. for R-3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition has been instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus against respondent No.1 not to evict the petitioner from a site at Shop No.6, A-Block, Arya Samaj Mandir, Kalkaji, New Delhi. A direction is also sought against respondent no.2/SHO, PS Kalkaji not to harass the petitioner. A direction is also sought against respondents No.3 and 4, i.e. the Secretary and Cashier, Arya Samaj Mandir Trust, restraining them from evicting the petitione...
State Bank of India vs.dr. Meera Luthra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.45/2017 + % STATE BANK OF INDIA Through: DR. MEERA LUTHRA & ORS. versus 31st July, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Adv. for Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra in person. Ms. Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Ms. Shivani Luthra and Ms. Parul Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 16.8.2012 and the first appellate court dated 5.10.2016; by which the courts below have awarded mesne profits to the respondents/plaintiffs at a particular rate, and which is RSA No.45/2017 Page 1 of 5 pleaded as being excessive. In order to understand the rate of mesne profits granted, let me reproduce para 26 of the judgment of the trial cour...
M/S. Toshniwal Enterprises Controls Limited vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 07.2017 Pronounced on:31. 07.2017 + W.P.(C) 4393/2017, C.M. APPL.19189-90/2017 M/S. TOSHNIWAL ENTERPRISES CONTROLS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Sh. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Gaurav Kejriwal, Sh. Sujit Keshri, Sh. Mikhil Sharda and Sh. Akshay Bhandari, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advocate with Sh. Birbal Prasad, Director, USOF, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Sh. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Leena Tuteja and Sh. Ishaan Chawla, Advocates, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Facts 1. The present Writ... Petitioner challenges the declaration of its bid as non-responsive by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (hereafter BSNL or Respondent No.3) in these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. The facts are that BSNL on 08.04.2016 issued a No...
Deepak Kumar & Anr. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 1893/2017 & Crl.M.A. 7741/2017 DEEPAK KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Ashish Sehrawat, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Amit Chadha, APP for State with SI Naveen, P.S. Sabzi Mandi. Mr.Kapil Yadav, Adv. for R-2 & 3 along with respondent no.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 2.3. ORDER3107.2017 % The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections 354/341/323/5IPC. Status report filed in the court. Same is taken on record. It is submitted that on 11th August, 2016 complainants/respondents No.2 and 3 being the counsel for opponents/Sarika, had appeared in the court of learned MM, Tis Hazari Courts, in a matrimonial dispute...
Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.baba Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2017 CS(COMM) 693/2016 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Ms. Prachi Aggarwal and Ms. Mrinali Menon Advocates Mr. S.K. Dutta (constituted Attorney) versus BABA ENTERPRISES CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Represented by: None. ..... Defendant CS(COMM) 693/2016 and I.A. No.7177/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC) 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff on instructions from the authorised representative of the plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw the suit as the disputes have been settled between the parties.2. Mr. S.K. Dutta son of late Shri A. N. Dutta is present in Court and is identified by learned counsel for the plaintiff. Authorisation in favour of Mr. S.K.Dutta has already been filed by the plaintiff in the form of extracts of minutes of meeting of Board of Directors of the plaintiff dated 16th June, 2014, copy whereof is at page 208 of the ...
M/S Good Year Security Services (Regd) vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. 07.2017 + W.P.(C) 6080/2017, C.M. APPL.25250-25251/2017 M/S GOOD YEAR SECURITY SERVICES (REGD)........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Abhay Kumar, Sh. Saurabh Mishra, Sh. Khalid Akhtar, Sh. Amit Kumar Singh and Sh. Himanshu, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Dr. Dharan, CMO (NFSG), CGHS. Sh. B.B. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Sh. Anirudh Singh Chauhan and Sh. Vikas Shokeen, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) Complaining of arbitrariness and violation of Article 14, the petitioner 1. has approached this Court to direct the second respondent (hereafter referred to as CGHS) to award a contract pursuant to its Notice Inviting Tenders (NIT) for providing security services and also quash the award of tender to the third respondent (hereafter referred to as Jai Prakash). This court had...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »