Deepak Kumar & Anr. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Deepak Kumar & Anr. vs The State Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 31, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1207512

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1207512
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jul 31, 2017
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak Kumar & Anr.

Respondent

The State Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Excerpt

.....for state with si naveen, p.s. sabzi mandi. mr.kapil yadav, adv. for r-2 & 3 along with respondent no.2 & 3 in person. coram: hon'ble mr. justice vinod goel1 2.3. order3107.2017 % the petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short ‘cr.pc’) for quashing of the fir bearing no.248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with police station subzi mandi, delhi, under sections 354/341/323/5ipc. status report filed in the court. same is taken on record. it is submitted that on 11th august, 2016 complainants/respondents no.2 and 3 being the counsel for opponents/sarika, had appeared in the court of learned mm, tis hazari courts, in a matrimonial dispute under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, titled as sarika v. deepak. when they were w.p. (crl.) no.1893/2017 page 1 of 2 coming out of the court after adjournment of the matter, an altercation took place between the complainants and the petitioners. resultantly, the said fir was lodged with police station subzi mandi. both the respondents no.2 and 3 are present and are duly identified by io si naveen. the parties have amicably settled their disputes in terms of settlement dated 5th may, 2017, which is placed on record. both the respondents no.2 and 3 submit that they do not want to pursue with the said fir. they submit that the fir may be quashed. the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no purpose would be served in further pursuing with the fir bearing no.248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with police station subzi mandi, delhi, under sections 354/341/323/5ipc. hence, to secure ends of registered on 11.08.2016 with police station subzi mandi, delhi, under sections 354/341/323/5ipc and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. the petition is disposed of. the fir bearing no.248/2016, justice, 4.5. 6.7. 8. july31 2017/jitender vinod goel, j.w.p. (crl.) no.1893/2017 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 1893/2017 & Crl.M.A. 7741/2017 DEEPAK KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr.Ashish Sehrawat, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr.Amit Chadha, APP for State with SI Naveen, P.S. Sabzi Mandi. Mr.Kapil Yadav, Adv. for R-2 & 3 along with respondent no.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 2.

3. ORDER

3107.2017 % The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.PC’) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections 354/341/323/5
IPC. Status report filed in the court. Same is taken on record. It is submitted that on 11th August, 2016 complainants/respondents No.2 and 3 being the counsel for opponents/Sarika, had appeared in the court of learned MM, Tis Hazari Courts, in a matrimonial dispute under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, titled as Sarika v. Deepak. When they were W.P. (Crl.) No.1893/2017 Page 1 of 2 coming out of the court after adjournment of the matter, an altercation took place between the complainants and the petitioners. Resultantly, the said FIR was lodged with Police Station Subzi Mandi. Both the respondents No.2 and 3 are present and are duly identified by IO SI Naveen. The parties have amicably settled their disputes in terms of Settlement dated 5th May, 2017, which is placed on record. Both the respondents No.2 and 3 submit that they do not want to pursue with the said FIR. They submit that the FIR may be quashed. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no purpose would be served in further pursuing with the FIR bearing No.248/2016, registered on 11.08.2016 with Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections 354/341/323/5
IPC. Hence, to secure ends of registered on 11.08.2016 with Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections 354/341/323/5
IPC and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of. the FIR bearing No.248/2016, justice, 4.

5. 6.

7. 8. JULY31 2017/jitender VINOD GOEL, J.

W.P. (Crl.) No.1893/2017 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Deepak Kumar & Anr. vs The State Nct of Delhi & Ors. Same Subject Land Acquisition