Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Renu Bala vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~42 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3228/2017 & CM No.14024/2017 Judgment delivered on:25. 05.2017 RENU BALA UNION OF INDIA Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Ms Zubeda Begum and Ms Sana Ansari, Advocates with petitioner in person. Mr. G. Tushar Rao and Mr. Sreenaths, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2505.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondent to allot a quarter on the ground floor in any nearby Govt. colony nearest to AIIMS Hospital. This prayer has been made in the peculiar facts of the case and medical condition of the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in view of the special facts and circumstances and in view of the request of the petitioner, the petitioner is being offered quarter No.03, Sector-4, R.K. Puram, which is a Ground Floor quarter. W...
Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt Ltd vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~50-64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 525/2015 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 527/201547 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Page 1 of 30 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 529/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2220/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2221/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2224/2015 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX W.P.(C) No.525 of 2015 & connected matters + W.P.(C) 2225/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2226/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPE...
State (Gnct of Delhi) vs.devender Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~16 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. L.P. 324/2017 Date of Judgment:25. h May, 2017 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP versus DEVENDER SINGH & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: Through: Nemo. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 8913/2017 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. 8912/2017 (delay) 3. Although we do not find any sufficient ground to condone delay, but since we have heard the leave to appeal on merits, delay of 172 days in filing the leave to appeal is condoned.4. Application stands disposed of. Crl. L.P. 324/2017 5. The present leave to appeal has been filed by the State under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) seeking leave to appeal against the impugned judgment dated 27.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Page 1 of 7 Crl. L.P. 324...
Smt. Gurmeet Kaur vs.shri Harbhajan Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.155/2016 + % SMT. GURMEET KAUR Reserved on:22. d May, 2017 Pronounced on:25. h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, Advocate with Mr. Brig. M.L. Khatter, Advocate. versus SHRI HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ch. Rabindra Singh, Advocate for Respondent no.2 with Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the legal heir of the plaintiff Sh. Sarwan Singh impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 10.4.2008 and the First Appellate Court dated 29.1.2016; by which the suit for possession and damages filed by the plaintiff has been dismissed. Since the plaintiff expired pendente lite and was now substituted by his legal heir, reference to the RSA No.155/2016 Page 1 of 15 appel...
Sohan Lal vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 239/2002 SOHAN LAL Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, PS Inderpuri. WITH CRL.A. 189/2002 RUKMA DEVI Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the PS Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, State, Inderpuri AND + CRL.A. 651/2002 RAJESH KUMAR Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. .....Appellant Crl. A. No.239,189&651/2002 Page 1 of 10 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus Through ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State, Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, PS Inderpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT Since all the three appeals have been preferred against the they are being 1. common judgment and order on sentence passed, dec...
Gulab Kant Yadav vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t March, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 326/2015 GULAB KANT YADAV ..... Appellant STATE Represented by: Ms. Seema Misra, Advocate for Ms. Naomi Chandra, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA State.1. Convicted for offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children against Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short 'POCSO Act'), Gulab Kant Yadav challenges the impugned judgment dated 26th July, 2014 and the order on sentence dated 4th August, 2014 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of `2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act, rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of `2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 377 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for offence punishable under Section 506 IPC.2. A...
Rizwan vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
Crop Care Federation of India & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4399/2017 & CM No.19196/2017 Judgment delivered on:25. 05.2017 CROP CARE FEDERATION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev K. Virmani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ashish Kothari, Advs. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for R-1,2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Dhruv Mohan, Adv. for RG JUDGMENT2505.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner by the present petition seeks a direction to respondent No.2 to expeditiously hear and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner being Appeal No.15/2016.2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal was listed for 17.04.2017, however on a request received on behalf of respondent No.4, the date of hearing was cancelled and no fresh date has been fixed. WP(C) 43992017 Page 1 of 2 3. The petitioner has prayed for expeditious di...
Kusth Asha Deep Federation vs.ajoy K. Paitandy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h May, 2017 CONT.CAS(C) 224/2004 & CM Nos.11081/2011, 14689/2011, 5058/2016 & 6396/2017 KUSTH ASHA DEEP FEDERATION Through: Dr.Brahm Dutt and Mr.Vivek Kumar, Advocates ........ Petitioner Versus AJOY K. PAITANDY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae Mr.Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Advocate for Department of Social Welfare. Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Nitin Jain, Advocate for DUSIB. Mr.J.L.Gupta, Dy. Commissioner, Shahdara, North Zone Mr.Ajjay Aroraa, Mr.Kapil Dutta and Ms.Diksha Lal, Advocates for East DMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER (ORAL) Violation of order of 30th July, 2003 in WP(C) 39is alleged in this contempt petition by petitioner who is Kusth Asha Deep Cont.Cas.(C) 224/2004 Page 1 of 7 Federation. Vide aforesaid order of 30th July, 2003, a Division Bench of this Court had formed a Committee comprising of nine members, who was to submit a report ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3 vs.instronics Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~40-49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA6132016 + + + + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA6142016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA6152016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA8012016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD ..... Respondent With ITA8052016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME ITAs No.613/2016, 614/2016, 615/2016, 801/2016, 805/2016, 809/2016, 814/2016, 840/2016, 848/2016, 849/2016. Page 1 of 10 + + + + TAX CENTRAL-3 Versus INSTRONICS LTD. With ITA8092016 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA8142016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA8402016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF ...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »