Renu Bala vs.union of India

Renu Bala vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 25, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1206267

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1206267
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: May 25, 2017
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Renu Bala

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

.....tushar rao and mr. sreenaths, advocates coram:-"hon’ble mr justice sanjeev sachdeva judgment2505.2017 sanjeev sachdeva, j.(oral) 1. the petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondent to allot a quarter on the ground floor in any nearby govt. colony nearest to aiims hospital. this prayer has been made in the peculiar facts of the case and medical condition of the petitioner.2. learned counsel for the respondent submits that in view of the special facts and circumstances and in view of the request of the petitioner, the petitioner is being offered quarter no.03, sector-4, r.k. puram, which is a ground floor quarter. wp(c) 3228/2017 page 1 of 2 3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is agreeable to accept the offer.4. learned counsel for the respondent submits that the quarter would be made habitable and the possession thereof will be offered to the petitioner within two weeks from today. his submission is taken on record.5. with regard to the prayer for grant of relocation allowance, the petitioner is permitted to make an application. the respondent shall consider the application, if any, made by the petitioner for reimbursement of relocation expenses, keeping in view the peculiar facts of the case, that the petitioner is being shifted on account of the re-development project and not because of his request.6. since this order has been passed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the same shall not be treated as a precedent.7. in view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to allot quarter no.03, sector-4, r.k. puram to the petitioner.8. dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j may25 2017/rs wp(c) 3228/2017 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~42 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3228/2017 & CM No.14024/2017 Judgment delivered on:

25. 05.2017 RENU BALA UNION OF INDIA Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent : Ms Zubeda Begum and Ms Sana Ansari, Advocates with petitioner in person. Mr. G. Tushar Rao and Mr. Sreenaths, Advocates CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2505.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondent to allot a quarter on the ground floor in any nearby Govt. colony nearest to AIIMS Hospital. This prayer has been made in the peculiar facts of the case and medical condition of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in view of the special facts and circumstances and in view of the request of the petitioner, the petitioner is being offered quarter No.03, Sector-4, R.K. Puram, which is a Ground Floor quarter. WP(C) 3228/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is agreeable to accept the offer.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the Quarter would be made habitable and the possession thereof will be offered to the petitioner within two weeks from today. His submission is taken on record.

5. With regard to the prayer for grant of relocation allowance, the petitioner is permitted to make an application. The respondent shall consider the application, if any, made by the petitioner for reimbursement of relocation expenses, keeping in view the peculiar facts of the case, that the petitioner is being shifted on account of the re-development project and not because of his request.

6. Since this order has been passed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the same shall not be treated as a precedent.

7. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to allot quarter No.03, Sector-4, R.K. Puram to the petitioner.

8. Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MAY25 2017/rs WP(C) 3228/2017 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Renu Bala vs Union of India Same Subject Land Acquisition