Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Baliram Anantrao Desai vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4671/2017 Judgment delivered on:26. 05.2017 BALIRAM ANANTRAO DESAI versus UNION OF INDIA Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner .... Respondent : Mr. Saurabh Bhargavan, Advocate. For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI. JUDGMENT2605.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-UOI to consider and decide the application, for renewal of certificate of Notary, filed by the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 11th September, 2015 in W.P. (C) No.8503/2015 titled Neelam Sharma Versus Union of India.3. This Court is of the opinion that as the representation/renewal application; filed by the petitioner is still pending, the respondent WP(C) 4671/2017 Page 1 of 2 must dispo...
Shyam Sahni vs.sarabjit Prakash & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~7,13&24. * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.1134/2008 & IA No.5689/2017 (of the plaintiff under Order XI Rules 12, 14 & 15 of the CPC). SHYAM SAHNI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Pandey and Mr. Rajeev Gurung, Advs. versus SARABJIT PRAKASH & ORS Through: Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Adv. for D-2. ..... Defendants Mr. Jayant Tripathi and Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advs. for D-7. AND CS(OS) No.511/2016, IAs No.14385/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) and 14386/2016 (of D-1 u/S151CPC). SARABJIT PRAKASH & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through SHYAM SAHNI & ORS ..... Defendants versus Through: Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Pandey and Mr. Rajeev Gurung, Advs. AND CS(OS) No.983/2013 SHYAM SAHNI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Pandey and Mr. Rajeev Gurung, Advs. versus SARABJIT PRAKASH & ORS. Through: Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Adv. for D-2. ..... Defendants Mr. Jayant Tripathi and Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advs. for D-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDL...
Sangeeta vs.arun Joon
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 113/2016 1. SANGEETA Through : Mr. Manoj Kr. Srivastava and Mr. Anuj Tyagi, Advocates with appellant in person. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through : Respondent in person. ARUN JOON CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % This order is in continuation of the order dated 24.5.2017, on which ORDER2605.2017 date, learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent, who had appeared in person, had jointly stated that the parties were able to arrive at a settlement before the Medication Cell, Rohini District Court, Delhi, reduced into writing on 12.5.2017. A copy of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement was handed over and taken on record. On the said date, the parties had requested that the impugned divorce decree passed by the learned Family Court under Section 13(i)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short the Act) may be converted into a decree of divorce by mutual c...
Dr Pawan Kumar vs.the State, Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :26. h MAY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 1989/2017 DR PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.S.S.Kulshrestha, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ajeet Pandey, Advocate. versus THE STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through : Ms.Anita Abhraham, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 06.04.2017 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge by which the application under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. filed by him was dismissed.2. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. Undisputedly, the petitioner is facing criminal proceedings in case FIR No.431/2016 registered under Sections 354A/354B/354/376(2)(E) IPC and SectionsPOCSO Act PS Moti Nagar. Upon completion of investigation, a charge-sheet has already been filed against him in the Court. It is informed that the ch...
Bernard Ingnieure Zt Gmbh vs.ircon International Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 167/2017 BERNARD INGNIEURE ZT GMBH ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Sindhu Sinha, Advocate. versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ishan Chawla and Ms. Leena Tuteja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2605.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU,J1 The petitioner is an Austrian company and has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') inter alia praying as under:-""a) secure the money under the bank guarantee in dispute in arbitration by directing the respondent No.1 to return/reverse the amount encashed under the bank guarantee in reciprocation of the bank guarantee issued by the bank Austria for the purposes of the tender/ contract between the petitioner and the respondent No.1; and/or respondent No.2 issued by the b) direct the Respondent No.2 and/ or his agents to return/ release ...
M/S Jayant Gas Service & Anr. Vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 26, 2017 + W.P.(C) 9206/2015 & C.M.No.21023/2015 M/S JAYANT GAS SERVICE & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Sharma & Mr. Pranav Versus Raj Singh, Advocates DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) ORDER In this writ petition, challenge is to demand of license fee at escalated rate and that too, without reason. A bare perusal of respondents Communication of 8th January, 2014 reveals that a demand of `2,03,614/- had been raised on account of license fee upto 31st March, 2010. This is second round of litigation. In the first round of litigation, a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order of 3rd October, 2013 in W.P.(C) 2499/2010 had quashed the earlier identical demand of 23rd March, 2010 with direction to respondent-DDA to inform petitioner about the rate of license fee charged, the basis thereof and to pass a speaking ...
Udyog Sheel Complex Occupants Welfare Association and Ors. Vs.registra ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 * + W.P.(C) 4716/2017, CM APPL. No.20483/2017 UDYOG ASSOCIATION AND ORS. Through: Mr. T. K. Tiwari, Advocate. SHEEL COMPLEX OCCUPANTS WELFARE ........ Petitioners versus REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Vaishnavi Rao, Advocate for Mr.Gaurav Verma, Advocate for RCS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL The present petition has been filed by the Udyog Sheel Complex ORDER2605.2017 % 1. Occupants Welfare Association and members of respondent No.2/Society praying inter alia for issuance a writ of mandamus to the respondent No.1/RCS to examine the complaints made by them against the purported illegal actions of the respondent No.2/Society which are stated to be in non- conformity with the DCS Act, 2003 and the Rules.2. On the first call, none was present on behalf of the respondent No.1/RCS. On the second call, Ms. Vaishnavi Rao, Advocate, who has appeared for th...
Ashit Kumar Mishra vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h May, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7219/2016 & CM Nos. 29725/2016, 29726/2016 ........ Petitioner Versus Puneet Kumar, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS ASHIT KUMAR MISHRA Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan & Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar with Ms. + W.P.(C) 7221/2016 & CM Nos. 29729/2016, 29730/2016 Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan & Mr. SONU KUMAR DUBEY Dipanjali Tyagi, Advocate Puneet Kumar, Advocates Versus With ........ Petitioner With ........ RESPONDENTS CK Bhatt, Advocate for R-1to5 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma with Mr. + W.P.(C) 7246/2016 & CM Nos. 29792/2016, 29793/2016 MOHITOSH KUMAR SHARMA Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan & Mr. Puneet Kumar, Advocates Versus ........ Petitioner WP(C).No.7219/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Versus With ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS With SWAMI NATH PRASAD Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan & Mr. Puneet K...
Md. Salim vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h April, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 277/2015 MD. SALIM STATE Represented by: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP with SI Satbir Singh PS Tilak Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC, Mohd. Saleem challenges the impugned judgment dated 22nd February, 2014 and the order on sentence dated 1st March, 2014 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of `3,000/-.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for Mohd. Saleem submits that there were discrepancies in the manner of reporting the incident by the prosecutrix to her mother. The Trial Court failed to notice that neither the medical evidence or the prosecutrix nor the FSL report support the allegations of the prosecutrix against the appellant. Though the alleged incident took place on ...
Rajesh Kumar vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 239/2002 SOHAN LAL Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, PS Inderpuri. WITH CRL.A. 189/2002 RUKMA DEVI Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the PS Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, State, Inderpuri AND + CRL.A. 651/2002 RAJESH KUMAR Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. .....Appellant Crl. A. No.239,189&651/2002 Page 1 of 10 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus Through ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State, Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, PS Inderpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT Since all the three appeals have been preferred against the they are being 1. common judgment and order on sentence passed, dec...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »