Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vimla Devi vs.pushpa Devi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % VIMLA DEVI RSA No.157/2017 29th May, 2017 Through: Mr. Yatendra Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus PUSHPA DEVI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. Nos. 20929-30/2017 (for exemptions) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.Ms. stand disposed of. RSA No.157/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.20928/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 28.3.2016 and the First Appellate Court dated 4.3.2017; by which the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for possession, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction, has been dismissed. RSA No.157/2017 Page 1 of 9 2. The facts of the case are that appellant/plaintiff claimed that she was the owner of 200 sq. yards of the property situated in khasr...
Naheed Carrimjee vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~46 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4865/2017 Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 NAHEED CARRIMJEE UNION OF INDIA versus ........ Petitioner .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Ashish Batra, Advocate. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2905.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.21090/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4865/2017 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-UOI to consider and decide the application for renewal of certificate of Notary filed by the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this WP(C) 4865/2017 Page 1 of 3 Court to judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 11th September, 2015 in W.P. (C) No.8503/2015 titled Neelam Sharma Versus Union of India.3. In view of the decision in the case of Neelam Sharma (Supra), I am of...
Vineet Adya vs.m/s Carabian Leisure & Entertainment Pvt & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~6. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 4/2017 and CM APPL. 367/2017 (delay) VINEET ADYA Through: Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellant versus M/S CARABIAN LEISURE & ENTERTAINMENT PVT & ANR Through: Mr. Trideep Pais and Ms. Sanya, Advocates with R-2 in person for self and as Director of R-1/company. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2905.2017 CM APPL. 21163/2017 (joint application u/O XXIII R3CPC) 1. The present joint application has been filed by the parties stating inter alia that they have been able to arrive at an out of court negotiated settlement, whereunder the respondents have und ertaken to pay a sum of Rs.25 lakhs to the appellant in ten instalments as detailed in para 3(a) of the application.2. Counsel for the respondents hands over ten post dated cheques to the appellant towards the ten instalments. The respondent No.2 who is present in person, undertakes on his behalf and...
Ram Swaroop & Ors. Vs.state Govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 29, 2017 CRL.A. 942/2001 RAM SWAROOP & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Anshul Garg, Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Mr. Rachit Gupta, Advocates for appellant No.1 and 2. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Mohd. Ainul Ansari, Advocates for appellant No.3 versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Gopal Singh, Police Station Mehrauli, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.By this appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr. P.C., 1. the appellants seek to challenge the impugned judgment dated 21.11.2001, passed in SC No.199/2000 in a case registered as FIR No.87/1999 under Section 452/323/308/5of IPC, at Police Station Mehrauli, Delhi. The appellants also challenge the order on sentence dated 21.11.2001, whereby they have been sentenced as follows: Crl. A. No.94...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.vinay Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :29. h MAY, 2017 CRL.L.P.340/2017 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. versus VINAY TIWARI ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.9324/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A.No.9325/2017 (Delay) 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal, the delay is condoned.2. The application for condonation of delay is disposed of. CRL.L.P.340/2017 1. Present petition has been filed by the State under Section 378 Cr.P.C. to seek leave to appeal against the judgment dated 27.07.2016 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.180/2015 arising out of Crl.L.P. 340/2017 Page 1 of 3 FIR No.591/2015 registered under SectionsIPC at PS Hauz Khas whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charges.2. I have hea...
Abid vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
CRL.A.589/2015 * % + ABID THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2017 Delivered on:29. 05.2017 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent : Mr.Shrikant Tyagi. : Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP. CRL.A.820/2015 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent + IMTIYAZ @ TOE STATE versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr.Sitab Ali Chaudhary. : Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP. JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 Both the criminal appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. CRL.A.589/2015 & Crl.A.820/2015 Page 1 of 6 2. Appellants Abid and Imtiyaz @ Toe have been convicted under Sections 395 and 397 of the IPC and have been sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years, fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine, SI for six months under both the counts by judgment and order dated 16.04.2...
Darshan Cold Storage P. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1859/2017 & CM No.8211/2017 & 19527/2017 Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 DARSHAN COLD STORAGE P. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : : Mr. Vivek Sibal, Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advocates. Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Advocate. JUDGMENT2905.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) PRESENCE OF RESP1 The petitioner seeks a direction to respondents to deseal the premises of the petitioner situated at C-34 Lawrence Road, Industrial Area and to permit the petitioner to carry out business from the said premises.2. The petitioner operates the cold storage and processing plant for meat and poultry under the name and style of M/s. Darshan Cold W.P.(C) No.1859/2017 Page 1 of 8 Storage Pvt. Ltd. from the premises at C-34 Lawrence Road, Industrial Area, New D...
All India Carrom Federation vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + % LPA4072017 and CM APPL. 20547/2017 ALL INDIA CARROM FEDERATION Date of Decision:29. 05.2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Dheesh Narayan in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC and Mr. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advocate for respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Aseem Malhotra & Mr. Devang Gautam, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr. Shukla on behalf of respondent No.1/ UOI. Mr. Malhotra accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2.2. The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order dated 17.05.2017, whereby the appellant/ petitioners application, i.e. C.M. No.18735/2017 seeking early hearing in W.P.(C.) No.3314/2016 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. LPA4072017 Page 1 of 5 3. The appellant-represented by Mr. V.D. Narayan, who claims himse...
In the Matter of Reena Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (In Vol. Liqn.) vs. ....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d May, 2017 Pronounced on:29. h May, 2017 CO.PET. No.38/2017 IN THE MATTER OF REENA MARKETING PVT. LTD. (IN VOL. LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, and Ms.Megha Bharara, Advocates for OL. versus Through: None ..... Respondent .... CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This is a petition under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter as the Act) by the Official Liquidator, seeking voluntary winding up of Reena Marketing Private Limited (hereinafter as petitioner).2. The petitioner company was incorporated on 25.04.2005 having Corporate Identity Number U51909DL2005PTC135325, under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana having the authorized Share Capital of the CO.PET. No.38/2017 Page 1 of 4 Company as `1,00,00,000/-divided into 10,00,000 equity shares of `10/- each.3. The registered office of the company is situated withi...
Smt Pooja vs.shri Kamal Rathore @ Laxmi Narain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 72/2013 & CM No.20331/2013 SMT POOJA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Vijay Laxmi Mewara, Advocate with appellant in person. versus SHRI KAMAL RATHORE @ LAXMI NARAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohd. Asif, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2905.2017 1. This order is in continuation of the order dated 26.05.2017, on which date, it was noted that certain compliances were required to be made by the parties in terms of the settlement recorded on 11.11.2016, which have not been made. The only step required to be taken was that the respondent had to deposit a sum of Rs.4 lakhs in the name of the minor child of the parties with a Nationalised Bank for being renewed from time to time, till the date the child attains the age of majority and that amount would be treated as full and final satisfaction of the settlement.2. Today learned counsels for...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »