Naheed Carrimjee vs.union of India

Naheed Carrimjee vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 29, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1206332

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1206332
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: May 29, 2017
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naheed Carrimjee

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

.....that the representation/renewal application filed by the petitioner needs to be reconsidered and disposed of by way of a speaking order.4. consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-"(i) the petitioner, if he so desires, may, within 10 days hereof, file more particulars/documents in support of his explanation for the delay in applying for renewal, if any. (ii) the respondent shall thereafter, within six weeks of the receipt of such further documents from the petitioner, consider the grounds given by the petitioner for condonation of delay in applying for renewal and shall take a reasoned decision thereon. (iii) the respondent, if of the opinion that the petitioner is to be denied the renewal for any other reason, would, wp(c) 4865/2017 page 2 of 3 after notifying the petitioner of the said reason and after giving the petitioner an opportunity of being heard thereon within the subject period of six weeks, shall pass reasoned order within a period of three months from today. (iv) needless to state that if the petitioners remains aggrieved, he shall have his remedies.5. copy of order be given dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j may29 2017 ‘rs’ wp(c) 4865/2017 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~46 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4865/2017 Judgment delivered on:

29. 05.2017 NAHEED CARRIMJEE UNION OF INDIA versus ........ Petitioner

.... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

For the Respondent : : Mr. Ashish Batra, Advocate. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2905.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) CM No.21090/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4865/2017 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-UOI to consider and decide the application for renewal of certificate of Notary filed by the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this WP(C) 4865/2017 Page 1 of 3 Court to judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 11th September, 2015 in W.P. (C) No.8503/2015 titled Neelam Sharma Versus Union of India.

3. In view of the decision in the case of Neelam Sharma (Supra), I am of the view that the representation/renewal application filed by the petitioner needs to be reconsidered and disposed of by way of a speaking order.

4. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

"(i) The petitioner, if he so desires, may, within 10 days hereof, file more particulars/documents in support of his explanation for the delay in applying for renewal, if any. (ii) The respondent shall thereafter, within six weeks of the receipt of such further documents from the petitioner, consider the grounds given by the petitioner for condonation of delay in applying for renewal and shall take a reasoned decision thereon. (iii) The respondent, if of the opinion that the petitioner is to be denied the renewal for any other reason, would, WP(C) 4865/2017 Page 2 of 3 after notifying the petitioner of the said reason and after giving the petitioner an opportunity of being heard thereon within the subject period of six weeks, shall pass reasoned order within a period of three months from today. (iv) Needless to state that if the petitioners remains aggrieved, he shall have his remedies.

5. Copy of order be given dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MAY29 2017 ‘rs’ WP(C) 4865/2017 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Naheed Carrimjee vs Union of India Same Subject Land Acquisition