Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay @ Payyu vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h APRIL, 2017 DECIDED ON :27. h APRIL, 2017 + CRL.A.845/2015 AJAY @ PAYYU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Puneet Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.469/2014 titled Rajesh @ Prem vs. State NCT of Delhi . (S.P.GARG) JUDGE APRIL27 2017 / tr...
Ratan Kumar Gupta vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~R-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 222/2006 Decided on:27. h April, 2017 RATAN KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Atif Shamim, Advocate with appellant in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This criminal appeal challenges the judgment dated 18.03.2006 of the Court of Special Judge in complaint case No.59/1999 holding the appellant guilty and convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as also the order of sentence passed on 20.03.2006 whereby punishment in the form of rigorous imprisonment for six months with fine of Rs.1500/- had been awarded for offence under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, besides rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.5,500/- for offence under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, bo...
Baldev Singh vs.the President M/S Archana Cinema Shopping Centre Assoc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6311/2010 & C.M.13398/2016 Date of Decision: April 27, 2017 BALDEV SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani, Advocate versus THE PRESIDENT M/S ARCHANA CINEMA SHOPPING CENTRE ASSOCIATION & ANR Through: Nemo .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 13th May, 2010 directs first respondent to pay lump sum compensation of `1,25,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum in lieu of reinstatement and back wages to petitioner-workman. The facts as noted in impugned Award need no reproduction for the reason that in this petition, reinstatement instead of lump sum compensation is sought.... Petitioner-workman was appointed as Maintenance Officer by first respondent-Management on 7th July, 1986 and without any notice or assigning any reason, his services were terminated on 28th October, 1998. Trial court has held termination of petitioners service as illegal for want of Inquiry. In this petition, n...
Rajesh @ Prem vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h APRIL, 2017 DECIDED ON :27. h APRIL, 2017 + CRL.A.469/2014 & CRL.M.B. 170/2015 + AND + RAJESH @ PREM ..... Appellant Through : Mr.L.S.Saini, Advocate with versus Mr.Yatin Grover & Mr.Gagan Jindal, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP. CRL.A.23/2016 RAHIS @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Amit Kumar, Proxy counsel. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT), DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. CRL.A.845/2015 AJAY @ PAYYU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Puneet Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. Crl.A.469/2014 & connected matters. Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 22.10.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.120/2013 arising out of FIR No.270/2010 PS Keshav Puram by which the appellants Rajesh @ Prem (A-1), Rahis @ Ganja (A-2) and Ajay @ Pay...
Gnct of Delhi vs.hari Kishan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~36 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA No.209/2016 Date of decision :27. h April, 2017 GNCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. B. Mahapatra, Adv. HARI KISHAN & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. N.S. Vasisht and Ms. Jyoti Kataria Bajaj, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Mr. Karan Sharma, Adv. for DDA/R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal has been filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi challenging an order dated 6th August, 2015 whereby W.P.(C)No.3007/2014 was allowed. The writ petition was directed against a communication dated 29th January, 2014 which was issued by the Land and Building Department of the Government of NCT of Delhi rejecting the application of the respondents for allotment of an alternate plot against the land belonging to the LPA No.209/2016 Page 1 of 6 grandfather of the respondents which had been acquired. The rejection was premised on the ground that the allot...
Inderjit Singh vs.punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~R-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INDERJIT SINGH Decided on: April 27, 2017 W.P.(C) 1559/2008 Through: Mr.Ashok Bhalla, Adv. ........ Petitioner PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jagat Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, with the ORDER2704.2017 1. following prayers: I. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing/set aside the Order dated 14.10.2006 of Respondent Bank with directions to the Respondent Bank to release full pay and allowances of the petitioner with all consequential benefits which would have been admissible to petitioner, had he been not placed under suspension and his withheld terminal dues along with interest @ 15% p.a. II. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, W.P.(C) 1559/2008 Page 1 of 19 order or direction commanding directions to the respondent bank to pay interest ...
Vijay Julka and Anr vs.m/s Samriddhi Mega Strctures and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~2 to 5. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7815/2015 and CM APPL. 15502/2015, 4116/2017 VIJAY JULKA AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person. versus + W.P.(C) 7816/2015 and CM APPL. 15509/2015, 4067/2017 M/S SAMRIDDHI MEGA STRCTURES AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1. VIJAY JULKA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person. versus RAMESH DUGAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1. Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate for R-6. + W.P.(C) 7817/2015 and CM APPL. 15513/2015, 4113/2017 VIJAY JULKA AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person. versus RAMESH DUGAR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1. Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate for R-7. WP(C) 781...
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Ankleshwar vs.aireff Detox Privat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 317/2016 OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. ANKLESHWAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Deepak Jain, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Jaspreet, Advocates versus AIREFF DETOX PRIVATE LTD. Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2704.2017 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J None appears for the respondent (hereafter ADPL) even though the In these circumstances, this petition is taken up 1. respondent stands served. for hearing in absence of representation on behalf of the respondent.2. The petitioner (hereafter ONGC) has filed the present petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 03.03.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the sole arbitrator.3. The principal controversy involved in the present petition is whether the impugned award is non est as the arbitrator had lost the mandate prior to making the impugned award.4. Briefly sta...
State vs.manju Vashisht
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. L.P. 249/2017 % STATE MANJU VASHISHT Date of Judgment:27. h April, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State. Versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 6916/2017 (condonation of delay) This is an application filed by the petitioners seeking condonation of 94 days delay in filing the present leave to appeal. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, present application is allowed. Delay in filing the present leave to appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 249/2017 1. The petitioner/State of NCT of Delhi has sought leave to appeal under section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 30.09.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, North-West District, Rohini Courts, New Crl. L.P. 249/2017 Pag...
Narcotics Control Bureau vs.unknown Person
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h April, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 5105/2015 & CRL.M.A.18398/2015 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Subhash Bansal, Standing Counsel with Mr.Shashwat Bansal, Adv. versus UNKNOWN PERSON ..... Respondent CORAM: Through: Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Sr,. Advocate (Amicus Curiae) Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The petitioner-Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter referred as NCB) has preferred the instant petition under Sections 482 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the impugned order dated 15.07.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS/N. Delhi in the case titled as NCB vs. Unknown Person. Further the petitioner also seeks for confiscation and disposal of the case property, i.e. seized property:-"45gm Cocaine, 555gm Heroin and 320gm Hashish along with its seized articles, packing materials and samples, under Section 63 (2) of the Narcotic CRL.M.C. 5105/2015 Page 1 of 16 Drug...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »