Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vijay Julka and Anr vs.m/s Samriddhi Mega Strctures and Ors

Vijay Julka and Anr vs M/S Samriddhi Mega Strctures and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 27, 2017
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1205607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijay Julka and Anr

Advocate Mr. Sermon Rawat, Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Mr. B.L. Wali

Respondent

M/S Samriddhi Mega Strctures and Ors

Excerpt

.....julka and anr ........ petitioners through: mr. sermon rawat, advocate and mr. ravi ranjan, advocate with petitioner no.1 in person. versus ramesh dugar and ors. ........ respondents through: ms. jasmine kottai, adv. for r-1. mr. b.l. wali, advocate for r-7. wp(c) 7815/2015 & connected matters page 1 of 3 + w.p.(c) 7820/2015 and cm appl. 15525/2015, 4066/2017 1. vijay julka & anr. ........ petitioners through: mr. sermon rawat, advocate and mr. ravi ranjan, advocate with petitioner no.1 in person. versus m/s. samriddhi mega structures ltd. & ors. ........ respondents through: none coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli hon'ble ms. justice sangita dhingra sehgal % learned counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that he does order2704.2017 not wish to press the present petitions as aaifr and bifr stand dissolved and all proceedings before the said fora stand abated with effect from 01.12.2016, the date on which the sick industrial companies (special provisions) repeal act, 2003 was given effect to, in terms of the gazette notification no.2794 dated 28.11.2016. he, however, reserves the right of the petitioners to approach the national company law tribunal for appropriate relief, in accordance with law. wp(c) 7815/2015 & connected matters page 2 of 3 2. leave, as prayed for, is granted. the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending applications. april27 2017 rkb/mk hima kohli, j sangita dhingra sehgal, j wp(c) 7815/2015 & connected matters page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~2 to 5. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7815/2015 and CM APPL. 15502/2015, 4116/2017 VIJAY JULKA AND ANR ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person. versus + W.P.(C) 7816/2015 and CM APPL. 15509/2015, 4067/2017 M/S SAMRIDDHI MEGA STRCTURES AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS

Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1. VIJAY JULKA & ANR. ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person. versus RAMESH DUGAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1. Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate for R-6. + W.P.(C) 7817/2015 and CM APPL. 15513/2015, 4113/2017 VIJAY JULKA AND ANR ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person. versus RAMESH DUGAR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1. Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate for R-7. WP(C) 7815/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + W.P.(C) 7820/2015 and CM APPL. 15525/2015, 4066/2017 1. VIJAY JULKA & ANR. ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person. versus M/S. SAMRIDDHI MEGA STRUCTURES LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % Learned counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that he does ORDER

2704.2017 not wish to press the present petitions as AAIFR and BIFR stand dissolved and all proceedings before the said fora stand abated with effect from 01.12.2016, the date on which the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003 was given effect to, in terms of the Gazette Notification No.2794 dated 28.11.2016. He, however, reserves the right of the petitioners to approach the National Company Law Tribunal for appropriate relief, in accordance with law. WP(C) 7815/2015 & connected matters Page 2 of 3 2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending applications. APRIL27 2017 rkb/mk HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J WP(C) 7815/2015 & connected matters Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial