Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul Kalkran vs.delhi Medical Council and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~61 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2017 W.P.(C) 1881/2017 RAHUL KALKRAN ........ Petitioner versus DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Saurabh Kirpal with Mr. Manohar Malik and Mr. Apoorv Malik, Advocates, Advocates. : Mr. Praveen Khattar, Advocate for respondent No.1 with Mr. LDS Uppal, Asstt. Secretary, DMC. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Biakthansangi and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocates for respondent No.2. Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava with Mr. Sameer Jain and Mr. Harmeet Singh Ruprah, Advocates for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % CAVEAT No.201/2017 ORDER0603.2017 Since learned counsel for the respondent No.3/Caveator has entered appearance, the caveat is discharged. CM No.8355/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1881/2017 & CM No.8354/2017 (stay) Issue notice. Notice i...
Chhattar Singh & Ors. Vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : March 06, 2017 Crl. A. No.528/2000 CHHATTAR SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. D.K. Mathur, Advocate ..... Appellants versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with ASI C.P. Singh, Police Station Krishna Nagar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 19.08.2000, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, thereby convicting the appellants Chattar Singh, Vijay Singh and Gian Singh for the offence punishable under Section 3of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and the appellant Balbir Singh for the offence under Section 323 of thereto, vide order on sentence dated 21.08.2000, the appellants - Chattar Singh, Vijay Singh and Gian Singh were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 yea...
Dinesh Chand & Anr vs.begraj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~1. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7592016 and CM APPL. 35815-35816/2016 DINESH CHAND & ANR Through: None BEGRAJ versus Through: None ..... Appellants ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present appeal was passed over on the first call at the request of ORDER0603.2017 the proxy counsel appearing for the counsel for the appellant, who had sought an adjournment on the ground that the arguing counsel is unavailable. On the order dated 17.01.2017 being pointed out to the learned proxy counsel, wherein it was made clear that no further accommodation shall be given to the counsel to address arguments on the next date, a pass over was sought. On the second call, none is present on behalf of the appellants.2. On 17.01.2017, having regard to the frequent adjournments sought on behalf of the appellants, while renotifying the matter for today, it was made clear that a final opportunity is being granted to the appellants to address arguments in the appe...
Ashoka Buildcon Limited & Anr. Vs.national Highways Authority of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on:06. h March, 2017 + WP(C) 76/2015 & CM Nos. 119/2015 & 4891/2015 ASHOKA BUILDCON LIMITED & ANR. ....... Petitioners versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocate with Mr Abhishek Sharma and Mr Yash Srivastava, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Pradeep K. Bakshi, Ms Prachi V. Sharma and Mr Ritvick Navel, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J WP(C) 76/2015 & CM Nos. 119/2015 (for stay) & 4891/2015 (for return of amount) 1. The... Petitioner by the present petition seeks quashing of the letter dated 01.01.2015, whereby the Respondent No.1 has informed the petitioner that its bid is non-responsive and further seeks a W.P.(C) No.76/2015 Page 1 of 20 direction thereby restraining the... RESPONDENTS from encashing the two bank gua...
Subhasis Kundu and Ors. Vs.uoi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 635/2009 Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Pronounced on:6. h March, 2017 10th January, 2017 SUBHASIS KUNDU AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Manish Jain, Mr. Ankur Garg, Mr. Rohit Goel and Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advs. versus % UOI & ANR. CORAM: Through : Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.1.2. Rule D.B. was issued in this matter on 19.07.2011. Challenge in this writ petition is to the orders dated 31.10.2007 in O.A. No.239/2007 and 20.02.2008 in R.A. No.01/2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (briefly the Tribunal) whereby both the application and the review filed by the petitioners herein have been dismissed.3. Brief facts to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioners at the relevant point of time were working as Personal Assistants (later redesignated as Ste...
Manish Kumar vs.the Chief Election Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1895/2017 1. MANISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Dr. H.P. Sharma, Advocate versus THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through : Mr. P.R. Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance copy, states that ORDER0603.2017 he has obtained instructions from the Election Commission to the effect that the representation dated 8.2.2017 submitted by the petitioner (Annexure P-2) shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within four weeks, under written intimation to him.2. In view of the submission made herein above, the present petition is disposed of. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision that may be taken by the respondent, he shall be at liberty to seek legal course against the same.3. The petition is disposed of. MARCH06 2017 sk HIMA KOHLI, J...
Karan Pal Singh Advocate vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 03.2017 + W.P.(CRL.) 545/2015 & CRL.M.A. No.1683/2016 KARAN PAL SINGH ADVOCATE Through... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rahul Mehra, Sr.Standing Counsel for the GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present public interest petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner with the prayer that this court may pass standing and bondable directions to all courts of Metropolitan Magistrate/ Additional Metropolitan Magistrate/ Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in the jurisdiction of this court relating to the provisions of Section 437(6) Cr.P.C. namely that if the trial cannot be concluded within specified period of sixty days from the first date fixed for taking evidence, the accused be released on bail without any further delay provided that there are no very, ...
Raju Singh & Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2017
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : March 02nd, 2017 CRL.A. No.736/2000 RAJU SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mr.K.S. Singh, Adv. with Ms.Tripta, Adv. & Mr.Rahul, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with SI Kamal Kumar WITH CRL.A. No.742/2000 RAJ BAHADUR & ORS. Through Mr.K.S. Singh, Adv. with Ms.Tripta, Adv. & Mr.Rahul, Adv. ..... Appellants versus STATE Through Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with SI Kamal Kumar. ..... Respondent AND CRL.A. No.743/2000 & Crl.M.A. No.12786/2013 VIJAY PAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr.K.S. Singh, Adv. with Ms.Tripta, Adv. & Mr.Rahul, Adv. versus STATE Crl. A. Nos.736, 742 & 743 of 2000 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 13 Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with SI Kamal Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeals have been preferred against a common judgment of conviction dated 17.11.2000 and common order on senten...
k.s. Jawatkar vs.the Chancellor Prof. Yash Pal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.884/2013 1st February, 2017 Reserved on: Pronounced on:3. d March, 2017 In person. ........ Petitioner + % K.S. JAWATKAR Through: versus THE CHANCELLOR PROF. YASH PAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for JNU. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1... Petitioner, Dr. K.S. Jawatkar has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-"(a) Declare 1993 amendment to Clause 6 of Academic Ordinance of JNU Act, 1966, vide Res. No.5.6/EC/4.10.1993, as illegal, null and void and ultra-vires the JNU Act, 1966, its Statues and Ordinances and violative of the... Petitioners Fundamental Rights under Article 14, 16, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India; (b) Direct the Chancellor and the respondent-University to grant statutory promotion to the petitioner as Professor w.e.f. 1.1.1992 and/or alte...
Shashi Kumar Shrivastava vs.the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d March, 2017 W.P.(C) No.8710/2010 + % SHASHI KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS. versus Through: Ms. Shifa Nagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Mr. Satyakam, Advocate for R CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who was appointed as a Lab Attendant (non- teaching staff) with the respondent No.3/school, seeks the relief of being appointed as a Lab Assistant.... Petitioner also seeks the necessary monetary emoluments of a Lab Assistant.2.... Petitioner pleads that petitioner satisfies the eligibility criteria for being appointed as a Lab Assistant and therefore the petitioner should be appointed to the post of Lab Assistant. W.P.(C) No.8710/2010 Page 1 of 5 3. The respondent No.3/school has filed a...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »