Dinesh Chand & Anr vs.begraj

Dinesh Chand & Anr vs Begraj

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 06, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1204657

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1204657
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Mar 06, 2017
Subject: Narcotics

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Narcotics

Key legal issue: Narcotics

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dinesh Chand & Anr

Respondent

Begraj

Excerpt

$~1. * + 1. in the high court of delhi at new delhi rfa7592016 and cm appl. 35815-35816/2016 dinesh chand & anr through: none begraj versus through: none ..... appellants ..... respondent coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli % the present appeal was passed over on the first call at the request of order0603.2017 the proxy counsel appearing for the counsel for the appellant, who had sought an adjournment on the ground that the arguing counsel is unavailable. on the order dated 17.01.2017 being pointed out to the learned proxy counsel, wherein it was made clear that no further accommodation shall be given to the counsel to address arguments on the next date, a pass over was sought. on the second call, none is present on behalf of the appellants.2. on 17.01.2017, having regard to the frequent adjournments sought on behalf of the appellants, while renotifying the matter for today, it was made clear that a final opportunity is being granted to the appellants to address arguments in the appeal today. further, it was clarified that if the counsels on record are unavailable for any reason, appropriate alternate arrangements rfa7592016 page 1 of 2 shall be made by the appellants to engage another counsel. despite the same, none is present on behalf of the appellants on the second call.3. it appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present appeal, which is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith the pending applications. hima kohli, j march06 2017 rkb rfa7592016 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~1. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7592016 and CM APPL. 35815-35816/2016 DINESH CHAND & ANR Through: None BEGRAJ versus Through: None ..... Appellants ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present appeal was passed over on the first call at the request of ORDER

0603.2017 the proxy counsel appearing for the counsel for the appellant, who had sought an adjournment on the ground that the arguing counsel is unavailable. On the order dated 17.01.2017 being pointed out to the learned proxy counsel, wherein it was made clear that no further accommodation shall be given to the counsel to address arguments on the next date, a pass over was sought. On the second call, none is present on behalf of the appellants.

2. On 17.01.2017, having regard to the frequent adjournments sought on behalf of the appellants, while renotifying the matter for today, it was made clear that a final opportunity is being granted to the appellants to address arguments in the appeal today. Further, it was clarified that if the counsels on record are unavailable for any reason, appropriate alternate arrangements RFA7592016 Page 1 of 2 shall be made by the appellants to engage another counsel. Despite the same, none is present on behalf of the appellants on the second call.

3. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present appeal, which is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J MARCH06 2017 rkb RFA7592016 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Dinesh Chand & Anr vs Begraj Same Subject Narcotics