Delhi Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hari Krishan Agarwal vs.indraprastha Power Generation Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos. 2506/2017 & 2514/2017 W.P.(C) No.2506/2017 1. HARI KRISHAN AGARWAL20h March, 2017 ........ Petitioner Mr. A.K. Vashishtha, Advocate. Through: versus INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD. .... Respondent Through: W.P.(C) No.2514/2017 2. VINOD KUMAR AGARWAL Mr. A.K. Vashishtha, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: versus INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD. .... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.2506/2017 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for the relief of being granted the second W.P.(C) Nos.2506 /2017 & 2514/2017 Page 1 of 9 Time Bound Promotion Scale (TBPS). The second TBPS as per the petitioner is the pay-scale of an Executive Engineer/Manager (Technical).2. The writ petition is hopelessly misconceived and is an abuse of process of law. The reasons wh...
Santosh Kumar vs.state, Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :20. h MARCH, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2722/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.116SANTOSH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Jatin Rajput, Advocate with Mr.Amit Raghav, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. Victim with her children in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR (Crime) No.94/2011 registered under Sections 143/147/366A/109/457/380/149 IPC at PS Gulbarga Rural, Karnataka. Status report is on record.2. The present case was transferred from 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, Karnataka to the District Judge, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi vide order dated 21.07.2014 of the Honble Supreme Court in Transfer Petition (Crl) No.399/2012 titled as Santosh & Anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Crl.M.C. 2722/2016 Page 1 of 3 3. I have heard t...
Anuj Bansal vs.enforcement Directorate and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
$~7. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 967/2017 1. ANUJ BANSAL Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arpan Wadhawan and Mr. Vivek Ojha, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Advocate with Mr. Kunal Dutt, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Dharam Dev, Advocate for R-3/Axis Bank. Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate for R-4/RBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Appearance is entered by learned counsel for the respondent ORDER2003.2017 No.3/Axis Bank, who states that he has received a complete set of the paper book. He also informs the Court that he has been nominated by Axis Bank to henceforth receive advance copies of petitions filed in the High Court and he shall take steps to communicate the same to the Registry.2. Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 states on instructions that the investigation in respect of the petitioner has concluded and an intimation to this effect shall be com...
Saroj Bala vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
$~02 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SAROJ BALA W.P.(C) 2462/2017 Date of decision:20. h March, 2017 Through Mr. Jose P. Verghese and Mr. Dhruv Jose, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Dr. Saroj Bala, in this writ petition, impugns the order dated 15th November, 2016, passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short), dismissing OA No.1556/2014 filed by her. The petitioner had made the following prayers before the Tribunal:-"In view of the submissions made hereinabove, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to:-"(a) direct the... RESPONDENTS No.1 & 2 to confirm the job of the applicants on the post where they are working as Paediatrics & Pathologist in the office of Respondent No.3 & 4 hospital and regul...
Uday Vir vs.secretary, Delhi Jal Board and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % UDAY VIR W.P.(C) No.5658/2003 20th March, 2017 Through: None. ........ Petitioner versus SECRETARY, DELHI JAL BOARD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner by this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks the relief of being appointed to the post of Sever Cleaning Machine Driver and also thereafter for regularization of his services from a backdate.2.... Petitioner in the present case was employed by the respondent/employer/Delhi Jal Board as a Sever Cleaning Machine Driver on Muster Roll basis with effect from August, 1999. After three years of service of the petitioner as a Sever Cleaning Machine Driver petitioner was again appointed on casual basis to a lower post of Beldar.... Petitioner, therefore, seeks appointment to the earlier post of W.P.(C) No.5658/2003 Page 1 of 3 Sever Clea...
National Highways Authority of India vs.cec-hcc Joint Venture
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 * + NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA O.M.P. (COMM.) 260/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapoor & Mr. Srikant Sharma, Advocates. versus CEC-HCC JOINT VENTURE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Lal & Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER2003.2017 1. The challenge in this petition, filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), is to an Award dated 31st March, 2014 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) by a majority of 2:1 in the disputes between the NHAI and the Respondent CEC-HCC Joint Venture, arising out of a contract agreement for the work of Rehabilitation and Upgrading of KM25300 to KM31600 of NH-76 to 4 lane configuration in the State of Rajasthan, (EW- II), Construction Package EW-II RJ-7. Background facts 2. The contract was a unit rate contract. The bidding documents ...
Shabnam vs.usman Ali and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
$~5. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA1432017 and CM APPL. 5216/2017, 5218/2017 SHABNAM Through: Mr. P. Suresh, Advocate ..... Appellant versus USMAN ALI AND ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved by the order dated 24.09.2016 ORDER2003.2017 passed by the learned trial court rejecting her suit for partition and permanent injunction instituted against her siblings, on an application filed by the respondents/defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant had sought an adjournment on the ground that he was not prepared with the brief. Today, he states on instructions that the appellant does not wish to press the present appeal on merits and requests that only a limited notice may be issued to the respondents to enable the parties, who are siblings, to sit across the table and negotiate a settlement, if possible.3. While disposing of the pr...
Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board & Anr vs.richa Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
$~07 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1504/2015 Date of decision:20. h March, 2017 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD & ANR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Manish Jain, DS (CC-I), DSSSB. CORAM: RICHA GUPTA versus Through Mr. Prag Chawla, Advocate. ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) and the Government of NCT of Delhi in this writ petition have impugned order dated 21st July, 2014, passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, in short) in OA No.926/2013.2. The impugned order allows the aforesaid OA filed by Richa Gupta, the respondent before us, with a direction that the petitioner shall finalise the selection process for the Post Code 1(Advertisement No.07/2007) and if Richa Gupta is selected on the basis of her position in the merit list, her dossiers shall ...
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. And Anr. Vs.vijay Kumar ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.4217/2003 20th March, 2017 Through: None. CENTRAL MINE PLANNING & DESIGN INSTITUTE LTD. AND ANR. ........ Petitioners VIJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed impugning the order dated 28.1.2003 passed by the Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes whereby there are directions with respect to promotion, handing over of file to CBI and withdrawing of a memo issued to Dr. B.C. Ruhidas.2. I may note that petitioners in para 10 of the Grounds of the writ petition have stated that signature on behalf of the petitioner No.1/company was obtained by coercion and force. I accept this stand of the petitioners. W.P.(C) No.4217/2003 Page 1 of 2 3. The issue in the present case is not res integra and decided by the...
D N Upadhyay vs.c B I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h December, 2016 Decided on:20. h March, 2017 CRL.M.C. 3408/2016 D N UPADHYAY ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Adv. C B I versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Sh. Narender Mann, Special PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 An important issue which arises of consideration in the present petition is whether documents seized by the police during investigation and not relied upon with the charge sheet can be retained by the investigating agency and not returned to the accused or the person authorized to retain those documents.2. A brief exposition of facts. RC Nos.0049(A)2003 DLI and 0050(A)2003-DLI (in short 49A/2003 and 50A/2003 respectively) were registered by the CBI against Vijay Kumar Manchanda, D.N. Upadhyay and others. On 11th September, 2003 documents were seized from the residence of D.N. Upadhyay vide seizure memo dated 11th September, 2003 and retained ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »