Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 1 of about 257 results (0.021 seconds)Manushi Sangathan Vs. Govt. of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h May 2014 Orders on:30. h September 2014 CONT. CAS (C) 564/2010, C.M. APPL. 14826/2010, 793/2012 MANUSHI SANGATHAN ..... Petitioner versus P.K. PANDA AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8580/2009, C.M. APPL.5656/2009 & 8503/2012 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 4572/2007, C.M. APPL.8544/2007, 6986/2010, 17940/2011, 626/2012, 2724/2012, 2801/2012, 3663/2012, 16320/2012, 16453/2012, 16454/2012, 6497/2013, 13874/2013 & 370/2014 MANUSHI SANGATHAN ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Indira Unninayar with Ms. Kirat Randhawa and Mr. Narayan Krishan, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Advocate for Chandni Chowk Vyapar Sangh, in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Ritesh Kumar, Ms. Mallika Ahluwalia and Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Advocates. Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, ...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash and ors Vs. Land Acquisition Collector (South) and ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 2482/2014 SUBHASH & ORS .... Petitioners versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (SOUTH) & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Deepak Khosla, Advocate with Mr Inder Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain, Advocate with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.50A/Suppl./1969-70 dated 04.11.1981 was made, inter alia, in respect...
Tag this Judgment!Manjit Singh Mehta Vs. Balwant Kaur
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2726/2012 % Judgment dated 30.09.2014 MANJIT SINGH MEHTA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.Gaurav Khanna & Mr Saurabh Tewari, Adv. versus BALWANT KAUR Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for Specific Performance of Contract u/s 5 of Specific Relief Act, Permanent Injunction and Compensation.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application were issued on 07.09.2012. Counsel for the defendant entered appearance on 03.04.2013 when time was granted to the defendant to file the written statement. No written statement was filed and none appeared for the defendant on subsequent dates to contest the matter, consequently vide order dated 22.04.2014, defendant was proceeded ex parte.3. Plaintiff, Mr.Manjit Singh Mehta has filed his affidavit by way of evidence and the same has been exhibited as PW-1/A. PW1 has deposed that the plaintiff and the defendant...
Tag this Judgment!Giriraj Singh and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 2298/2014 & CM48202014 GIRIRAJ SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S. Vashisth, Mr Vishal Singh, Ms Jyoti Kataria and Mr Madhur Bhargava, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Siddharth Pande, Advocate with Ms Priyabrat Sahu, Advocate for R-5/L&B CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the benefit of Section 24 (2) of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the `2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The prayers made in this present petition are as under:(i) WP(C) 2298/2014 Issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction of the similar nature declaring...
Tag this Judgment!Oruj Ahmed Vs. RashiduddIn and ors
Court: Delhi
$~10. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 30, 2014 + CS(OS) 2310/2011 ORUJ AHMED Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Y.D. Nagar, Adv. versus RASHIDUDDIN & ORS Through : ..... Defendants Mr.Anwarali Khan, Adv. for D-1. Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Tamin Dadri, Adv. for defendants no.2 and 3. Mr.Siddharth Panda, Adv. for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for LAC. Ms.Manpreet Kaur, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.,(Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff with the following prayers: (a) (b) (c) 2. pass a decree for declaration that the plaintiff is the owner of the plot measuring 400 sq. yards, comprising Khasra No.378/172, (measuring 2 bighas 3 biswas), Khewat Jamabandi No.93 (Min) Khatauni No.243, as per Jamabandi for the year 1960-61 of Revenue Estate of Village Okhla Distt. Delhi, and as per site plan attached herewith; pass a decree for possession against the defendants and in favour of the plaintiff in respect of th...
Tag this Judgment!initiative for Transportation and Development Prog Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h May 2014 Orders on:30. h September 2014 CONT. CAS (C) 564/2010, C.M. APPL. 14826/2010, 793/2012 MANUSHI SANGATHAN ..... Petitioner versus P.K. PANDA AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8580/2009, C.M. APPL.5656/2009 & 8503/2012 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 4572/2007, C.M. APPL.8544/2007, 6986/2010, 17940/2011, 626/2012, 2724/2012, 2801/2012, 3663/2012, 16320/2012, 16453/2012, 16454/2012, 6497/2013, 13874/2013 & 370/2014 MANUSHI SANGATHAN ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Indira Unninayar with Ms. Kirat Randhawa and Mr. Narayan Krishan, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Advocate for Chandni Chowk Vyapar Sangh, in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Ritesh Kumar, Ms. Mallika Ahluwalia and Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Advocates. Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, ...
Tag this Judgment!Avinash Mishra Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 09.2014 + W.P.(C) 821/2014 & C.M. NO.1655/2014 AVINASH MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Sh. A.K. Behera and Sh. Ajesh Luthra, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC along with Sh. G. Rajeev, Under Secretary, Planning Commission. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 15.01.2014 dismissing O.A. No.3658/2013. In that application, the petitioner had challenged the proceedings which led to an inquiry into complaint of misconduct amounting to sexual harassment at the work place.2. The brief facts are that the Petitioner was working as Joint Advisor (Water Resources) in the Planning Commission and was in direct line for consideration to the promotional post of Advisor (Water Resources), which was due to fall vacant on 11.08.2013. He w...
Tag this Judgment!Amanjeet Singh Vs. Yashpal Singh Chauhan and anr
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1287/2012 % Judgment dated 30.09.2014 AMANJEET SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sunil Dalal, Adv. versus YASHPAL SINGH CHAUHAN & ANR Through ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs 1,00,000,00 (One Crore Only) along with pendente lite and future interest.2. Summons in the suit were issued on 07.05.2012. Counsel for the defendants entered appearance on 08.11.2012. In the order dated 05.03.2013, it was noticed that despite time being granted no written statement was filed by defendants No.1 and 2 and the matter was put up for evidence of the plaintiff.3. Since none appeared on behalf of the defendants in the matter, vide order dated 02.09.2014, right of the defendants to cross examine PW1 was closed and the defendants were proceeded ex parte.4. Plaintiff, Mr Amanjeet Singh, has filed his affidavit by way of evidence and the same has bee...
Tag this Judgment!Manushi Sangathan Vs. P.K. Panda and ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h May 2014 Orders on:30. h September 2014 CONT. CAS (C) 564/2010, C.M. APPL. 14826/2010, 793/2012 MANUSHI SANGATHAN ..... Petitioner versus P.K. PANDA AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8580/2009, C.M. APPL.5656/2009 & 8503/2012 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 4572/2007, C.M. APPL.8544/2007, 6986/2010, 17940/2011, 626/2012, 2724/2012, 2801/2012, 3663/2012, 16320/2012, 16453/2012, 16454/2012, 6497/2013, 13874/2013 & 370/2014 MANUSHI SANGATHAN ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Indira Unninayar with Ms. Kirat Randhawa and Mr. Narayan Krishan, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Advocate for Chandni Chowk Vyapar Sangh, in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Ritesh Kumar, Ms. Mallika Ahluwalia and Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Advocates. Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, ...
Tag this Judgment!Merck Serono S.A. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 09.2014 W.P.(C) 4157/2012 & CM No.8637/2012 MERCK SERONO S.A. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Pravin Anand, Mr Dhruv Anand & Ms Udita Patro, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr B.S. Shukla, CGSC with Mr Brajesh Kumar, : Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is stated to be the biopharmaceutical division of Merck KgaA, a chemical and life sciences company. The petitioner impugns an order dated 13.08.2008 passed by the Controller of Patents & Design whereby its National Phase Application bearing No.01363/DELNP/2003 (hereinafter referred to as the application) for invention titled A process of preparing a pharmaceutical composition for the treatment and/or prevention of heart disease and the compositions thereof was declared as abandoned. The petitioner also assails the o...
Tag this Judgment!