Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 43 of about 438 results (0.010 seconds)Shiv Narayan Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.2574/2014 Shiv Narayan Singh Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Girijesh Pandey, Advocate with Mr. B.S. Sharma, Advocate. versus Union of India & Ors. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Shalini Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr. Surender Pal, Assistant Commander for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to quash the order dated 27.11.2012 passed by the Inspector General, CISF (N/S), the Appellate Order dated 24.10.2013, and the order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the Senior Commandant, 05th RB, Ghaziabad, U.P. on the revision petition filed by the Petitioner.2. The Petitioner was charged vide Memo No.V-15014/5th RB/Disc/Rule-36/SN Sing/11/3228 dated 28.06.2011 for not informing to the department of his arrest and confinement in District Jail, Kanpur from...
Tag this Judgment!Microsoft Corporation and anr Vs. Prithviraj and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1623/2010 % Date of Decision :02. 05.2014 MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Aashish Somasi, Adv. VERSUS PRITHVIRAJ & ANR. Through: Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyrights, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profit, damages etc. Summons were issued in the suit on 13.08.2010 and on 24.052011. On an application for appointment of Local Commissioner filed by the plaintiffs, a Local Commissioner was appointed in the matter. None appeared on behalf of defendants despite service, hence defendants were proceeded ex parte on 24.10.2011.2. The plaintiffs have filed affidavit by way of evidence of Constituted Attorney of Plaintiff No.1 and Plaintiff No.2 Col. J.K. Sharma (Retd.) (PW1). Letter of Authority and Power of Attorney in favour of Col.J.K.Sharma (Retd.) has been exhibited a...
Tag this Judgment!Si (M) Arun Kumar Poddar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.2757/2014 and CM No.5720/2014 SI (M) Arun Kumar Poddar Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus Union of India & Ors. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.CM No.5720/2014 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. WP(C) No.2757/2014 1. By way of the present writ petition, the Petitioner, who is serving as a Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to give effect to his promotion to the post of Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) retrospectively from 27.09.1996 when his counterparts were promoted with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay, security etc. for the intervening period.2. The immediate reason why the Petitioner appears to have filed the present writ petition is that according to the Petitioner, the Peti...
Tag this Judgment!Alka JaIn Vs. M/S Scholar Publishing House(P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2960/2012 % Judgment dated 02.05.2014 ALKA JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. U.N. Sharma, Advocate versus M/S SCHOLAR PUBLISHING HOUSE(P) LTD ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery in the sum of Rs.40,13,554.58 together with pendene lite interest and future interest.2. Summons in the suit were issued vide order dated 26.9.2012. The defendant entered appearance on 8.3.2013. Since the written statement was not filed, the matter was put up for plaintiffs evidence on 17.9.2013. As none appeared on behalf of the defendant on 17.9.2013, 26.2.2014 and 15.3.2014, having regard to the fact that neither the written statement nor the affidavit of evidence was filed by the defendant, defendants evidence was closed by the learned Joint Registrar vide Order dated 2.5.2014. The plaintiff has filed affidavit by way of evidence of Mr.Arun Kuma...
Tag this Judgment!Vaishali Gaur and Another Vs. Sanjay Sharma and Another
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE W DELHI Order Reserved on:31. st March, 2014 Order Pronounced on:01. st May, 2014 IA6242014 in CS(OS) 1731/2013 V AISHALI G AUR & ANOTHER ...... P LAINTIFFS Through: Mr. M. K. Vashisht, Adv. versus S ANJAY S HARMA & A NOTHER ......D EFENDANTS Through: Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for Defendant No.1 Mr.S.N.Gupta and Mr.Sahil Dhawan, Advocates for Defendant No.2 CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. Plaintiff by the present application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC has sought amendment of the plaint.2. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking a declaration that the Plaintiffs be declared as the rightful owner of the suit property and for a declaration that the sale deed dated 27.12.2012 executed by Defendant ===================================================================== No.1 in favour of Defendant No.2 in respect of the suit property be declared as null and void with consequential relief of possession.3. The Plai...
Tag this Judgment!Om Prakash and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 01, 2014 + CRL.A. 673/1999 OM PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. B.S. Chowdhary, Advocate Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 By this appeal filed under section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the appellants seek to challenge the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 27.11.1999 and 4.12.1999 respectively whereby the Appellants were convicted for committing an offence punishable under Section 302/149, 308/149, 452/149, 148/149, 147/149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC). They were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under section 302/149 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years for the offence punishable under sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Housing Development Finance Vs. Amrit Mishra and Another
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE W DELHI Order Reserved on:19. th March 2014 Order Pronounced on:1. st May, 2014 CS(OS) 2508/2012 HOUSING DEVELOPM ENT FINANCE CORPORATION L IMITED Through: ....PLAINTIFF Mr Neeraj Advocate Kumar, VERSUS AM RIT MISHRA & ANOTHER Through: ...DEFENDANTS Nemo CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. This is suit for recovery filed under Order 37 CPC. The Defendant No.l has been served by affixation a t the gate of the society on 28.01.2013 and also by way of affixation on the notice board of the Delhi High Court on 22.01.2013 and the process server also submitted a report dated 28.01.2013 that he had visited the society and met the guard Mr. Dineshwar Prasad, who made the process server speak to someone of flat No.B-304 over telephone. The person on the other end first ===================================================================== identified himself as Mr. Amrit Mishra and on hearing about the notice stated that he is the br...
Tag this Judgment!The Indian Hotels Company Ltd Vs. Ashwajeet Garg and ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE W DELHI Order Reserved on:14. th February 2014 Order Pronounced on:1 st May, 2014 CS(OS) 394/2012 T HE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY L TD Through: ...... PLAINTIFF Ms. Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali Mittal and Ms. Nupur Kumar, Advocates versus ASHWAJEET GARG AND ORS Through: ..... DEFENDANTS Mr. Gaurav Advocate Miglani, CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.IA No.3052/2012 (under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC), IA No.5844/2012 (under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC) and IA No.7826/2012 Section (under 124 of Trademarks Act, 1999) 1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction thereby restraining the Defendants from infringing the registered trademark of the Plaintiff. ===================================================================== 2. The Plaintiff claims to be the owner of a chain of hotels referred to as Taj Group of Hotels. The Plaintiff in the year 2004 adopted the mark JIVA in relation to the business of SPA. The said mar...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 23, 2014 Decision on: May 01, 2014 CRL.A. No.272 of 2008 DINESH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Mr. M. Shamikh and Mr. Lokesh Chandra, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0105.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 13 th March 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge in CC No.1/03 holding the Appellant guilty for the offences under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 17th March 2008 sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for two years and fine of Rs. 2,000, and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for a period of one month for the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act. For the offence under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the PC Act, the Appellant was sentenced to un...
Tag this Judgment!inder Dev Yadav and ors Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :5. h FEBRUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :1. t MAY, 2014 + CRL.A. 545/2011 & CRL.M.B.No.209/2014 INDER DEV YADAV AND ORS. Through : ..... Appellants Ms.Rajni Singh, Advocate for A1. Mr.U.K.Giri, Advocate for A2. Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate for A3. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Inder Dev Yadav (A-1), Sushil Parsad (A-2) and Ram Dev Mandal (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 30.03.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.147/08 arising out of FIR No.438/08 PS Jahangir Puri by which they were convicted under Section 20 Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (in short NDPS Act). By an order dated 06.04.2011, they were awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 1,00,000/- each.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge- sheet was that on 26.08.2008 secret information was received by SI Bhasker Sharma at his office (C...
Tag this Judgment!