Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Jeet Ram Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 07, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1795/2014 JEET RAM GUPTA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.T.Singhdev, Mr.Mohd.Ali Chaudhary, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Mahesh Srivastava, Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav M.Srivastava and Mr.Ravi N.Rout, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. The impugned Office Order No.132/2013 dated December 23, 2013 has been issued by the Central Government and is addressed to The National Co-operative Consumers Federation of India Ltd., a multi-State co-operative society registered under The Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. It conveys the decision of the Competent Authority that hithertofore Shri S.K.Nag, Director (CWF) would hold additional charge to the p...
Tag this Judgment!Joginder Singh Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :7. h MAY, 2014 + CRL.A.574/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.1144/2013 JOGINDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Mallika Parmar, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR. Through : AND + ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A.575/2012 K.DEEP SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rajiv Sirohi, Advocate with Mr.Rambir Singh Kundu, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals stand disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.573/2012 titled Rakesh Kumar vs. The State & Anr.. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE MAY07 2014/ tr...
Tag this Judgment!Rajbir Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :01. 05.2014 Judgment delivered on :07. 05.2014 CRL. APPEAL NO.760/2002 & CRL. M.A. NO.2542/2002 RAJBIR ..... Appellant + Through Appellant with his counsel Mr. M.D. Farman, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 11.09.2002 & 12.09.2002 respectively wherein he has been convicted under Sections 452/324 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for 1 month for the offence under Section 452 of the IPC; for his conviction under Section 324 of the IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for 1 year. Both the sentences were to run concurrently. Benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.PC has been granted to the appellant. 2 Nominal roll of the appellant has been re...
Tag this Judgment!K.Deep Singh Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :7. h MAY, 2014 + CRL.A.574/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.1144/2013 JOGINDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Mallika Parmar, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR. Through : AND + ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A.575/2012 K.DEEP SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rajiv Sirohi, Advocate with Mr.Rambir Singh Kundu, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals stand disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.573/2012 titled Rakesh Kumar vs. The State & Anr.. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE MAY07 2014/ tr...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Surendra Prasad Verma and anr. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.167/2012 7th May, 2014 % SH. SURENDRA PRASAD VERMA & ANR. Through: None. ..... Appellants Versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sandip Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 impugning the judgment of the Tribunal dated 18.10.2011 which has dismissed the claim petition filed by the parents of the deceased Sh. Rajesh Kumar Nidhi who died in an untoward incident on 1.6.2009.2. The facts of the case are that the deceased Sh. Rajesh Kumar Nidhi, a student aged 19 years, resident of Village Ajwan, Police Station Naubatpur, District Patna (Bihar) had purchased a Super Fast Journey Ticket from Patna Jn. to New Delhi on 1.6.2009 and had boarded the train no.2391 UP Sharamjeevi Express. FAO1672012 The train, after commencement of Page 1 of 8 journey, halted at ...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :7. h MAY, 2014 + CRL.A.573/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.392/2014 RAKESH KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajiv Sirohi, Advocate with Mr.Rambir Singh Kundu, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR. Through : + ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A.574/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.1144/2013 JOGINDER SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Mallika Parmar, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR. Through : AND + ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A.575/2012 K.DEEP SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Crl.A.No.573/2012 to 575/2012 Mr.Rajiv Sirohi, Advocate with Mr.Rambir Singh Kundu, Advocate. Page 1 of 12 versus THE STATE & ANR. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellants, Rakesh Kumar (A-1), Joginder Singh (A-2) and K.Deep Singh (A-3) question the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 02.03.2012 of Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.07/11 ar...
Tag this Judgment!Lt Foods Limited Vs. Heritage Foods (India) Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:07. 05.2014 FAO(OS) 3/2014 LT FOODS LIMITED ..... Appellant versus HERITAGE FOODS (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr J.Sai Deepak, Ms Rachel Mamatha & Ms Julien George. For the Respondent : Ms Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr Sudeep Chatterjee, Mr Arjun Mukherjee and Ms Suhasini Raina. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 20.11.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A.No.10244/2011 whereby the learned Single Judge has directed return of the plaint. I.A. No.10244/2011 was a composite application by the respondent/defendant under Order 7 Rule 10 and Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Insofar as the plea under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is concerned, that was targeted against the infringement action which the appellant/plaintiff had broug...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Sharma Vs. P.O. Industrial Tribunal No. 1 and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on May 07, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2412/1999 RAJ KUMAR SHARMA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms. Aarushi Aggarwal, Advocates versus P.O. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No.1 AND ORS. Represented by: Nemo ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated January 16, 1999 passed by the Industrial Tribunal whereby the Industrial Tribunal has held that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with the reference as cause of action arose at Agra, and therefore, appropriate Government to make reference was the State of U.P.2. Some of the brief facts are, the Industrial Dispute was referred by the erstwhile Delhi Administration vide order dated July 27, 1994, on the following terms:Whether the penalty of stoppage of five increments imposed on Shri Raj Kumar by the management is illegal and/or unjustified and if so, to what relief is he e...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Kamla Kumar Vs. Smt. Kamlesh Kumar and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA212014 & CM No.1381/2014 (stay) 7th May, 2014 % SMT. KAMLA KUMAR Through: ......Appellant Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Adv. VERSUS SMT. KAMLESH KUMAR & OTHERS ...... Respondents Through: Mr. P.Kalra and Ms. Janay Yadav, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This second appeal is filed under Section 100 CPC against the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 11.7.2013 and the first appellate court dated 22.11.2013; by which the suit for specific performance and possession filed by the appellant-plaintiff with respect to the agreement to sell dated 28.9.2000 pertaining to the property bearing plot nos.36 and 37 admeasuring 300 sq. yds forming part of K.No.54/29, village Mitraon, Delhi, now known as Gopal Nagar, C-Block, Najafgarh, New Delhi-43, has been dismissed.2. Right at the outset I must state that the impugned judgments of both the co...
Tag this Judgment!Rajwati Devi Vs. the Manager Max New York Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and ...
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2014
S.A. Saddiqui, Member (Judicial): 1) This appeal has been filed under Section 15 of C.P.Act, 1986 against order dated 3.9.2010 passed by Ld. DCDRF (East), Saini Enclave, Delhi “ 92 in complaint case No.475/2009. Facts leading to the filing of the appeal are noted below : 2)Appellants son namely Amrit Lal has taken a whole life insurance cover policy bearing No.327164968 for a sum of Rs.2,34,511/- for the period 29.8.2007 to 28.8.2008 and paid premium of Rs.5000/- (appellant is the mother and nominee of Sh. Amrit Lal). Unfortunately, during the subsistence of the policy Amrit Lal died on 2.5.2008. Information of the death of the insured was given to the respondent Insurance Company through Smt. Poonam Sharma, Respondent No.2 on 3.5.2008. Insurance claim was duly filed by appellant/nominee. Respondent No.1 through its letter dated 8.5.2008 demanded original policy documents, original death certificate, claimants statement “ form A, Photo I-D, attending Physicians statement &l...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »