Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax, (C) - Iii Vs. Vineeta Gupta and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 05.2014 W.P.(C) 829/2013 & CM15962013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (C) - III ..... Petitioner versus VINEETA GUPTA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.P.Sahni. For the Respondents : Mr Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr Vivek Kohli, Ms Shivambika Sinha and Mr Kunal Bahri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax impugning the order dated 21.05.2012 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission under Section 245D(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent No.1 had approached the Settlement Commission by way of a settlement application in respect of Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2009-10.2. The only point raised by Mr Sahni appearing on behalf of the Revenue/petitioner was that the respondent No.1 had not made a full and...
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-ii Vs. Smt. Kusum Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2014
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:06. 05.2014 + ITA2062014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-II ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Judy James, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus SMT. KUSUM GUPTA .... Respondent Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The Revenue claims to be aggrieved by an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 25.10.2013 and urges that the treatment of `70,77,375/- by it and the CIT (A) as long term capital gain in the facts of the case is erroneous.2. The assessee filed the return of income declaring `6,16,070/- in respect of AY200708. In this, she had claimed `70,77,375/- as long term capital gain and, therefore, exempt under Section 10 (38) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer by his order holds that the assessee carried on the business of shares and securiti...
Jai Prakash Panwar Vs. Director of Education and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2014
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:06. 05.2014 + W.P.(C) 8046/2013 JAI PRAKASH PANWAR ..... PETITIONER VERSUS DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ..... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advocates For the Respondents: Ms. Bandana Shukla, proxy counsel for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. B.B.Gupta, Advocate for R-3 CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 By this writ petition, the petitioner, in substance, seeks re- employment in terms of notifications dated 29.01.2007, 15.02.2008 and 24.09.2013 issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi.2. To be noted, this is a second round of litigation. In the earlier round, the petitioner had approached this court, by way of a writ petition, being: WP(C) No.1243/2012. This court, by an order dated 25.09.2013, had directed the concerned school i.e., respondent no.3 herein, to treat the writ petition as a representation an...
Govind @ Govinda and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 05.2014 + CRL.A. 738 of 2013 RAMKARAN THR. PAROKAR SUSHILA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Sharma, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. CRL.A. 750 of 2013 HUNNY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.C. Budhiraja, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. CRL.A. 848 of 2013 GOVIND @ GOVINDA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. P.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: Crl. A. Nos.738, 750 & 848 of 2013 ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 25.04.2005 at about 9.45 pm, PCR was informed that a quarrel had taken place at Pandav Nagar, Main Road. The information, when conveyed to Police Station Pandav Nagar, was recorded vid...
Vinod Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 05.2014 + CRL.A. 1567 of 2013 SONI SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1568 of 2013 LAKHPAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1571 of 2013 VINOD KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1575 of 2013 DHAN BAI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 24.9.2004, on receipt of copy of DD No.62B, Head Constable Bhagirath of Police Station Sultanpuri reached House No.D-2/21, Sector-20, Sultanpuri, where ASI Karambir of Excise Department was found present. He was informed that the injured, S.I. Virender of Excise Department, had alre...
Dhan Bai Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 05.2014 + CRL.A. 1567 of 2013 SONI SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1568 of 2013 LAKHPAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1571 of 2013 VINOD KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1575 of 2013 DHAN BAI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mir Akhtar, Adv. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 24.9.2004, on receipt of copy of DD No.62B, Head Constable Bhagirath of Police Station Sultanpuri reached House No.D-2/21, Sector-20, Sultanpuri, where ASI Karambir of Excise Department was found present. He was informed that the injured, S.I. Virender of Excise Department, had alre...
M/S Leo Ispat Ltd. Vs. M/S Radlay Metal Products Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 05.2014 CO.PET.373/2012 & CA No.1485/2012 M/S NAKSHATRA STEEL SALES & SERVICES LTD. ..... Petitioner versus M/S RADLAY METAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent AND + CO. PET. 375/2012 & CA No.1492/2012 M/S LEO ISPAT LTD. ..... Petitioner versus M/S RADLAY METAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Vivek Singh. For the Respondents : Mr Tanmaya Mehta. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petitions have been filed by the petitioner companies under sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), inter alia, praying for winding up of the respondent company on the ground that the respondent company has failed and neglected to pay a sum of `1,03,18,917/- along with late payment charges (in Co. Pet. No.373/2012) and a sum of `1,18,11,927/- along with late payment charges (in Co. Pet. No.37...
M/S. Jagdamba Impex Vs. M/S. Tristar Products Private Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.128/2014 and FAO1292014 5th May, 2014 % FAO No.128/2014 & CM Nos. 7778-79/2014 M/S. JAGDAMBA IMPEX Through: ......Appellant Mr. C.M. Lal, Mr. Subhash Dhutoria, Mr. Nancy Roy, Advocates VERSUS M/S. TRISTAR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LTD. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocates FAO No.129/2014 & CM Nos. 7782-83/2014 M/S. JAGDAMBA IMPEX Through: ......Appellant Mr. C.M. Lal, Mr. Subhash Dhutoria, Mr. Nancy Roy, Advocates VERSUS M/S. TRISTAR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LTD. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat Nos.395/2014 & 396/2014 Counsel appears for the caveators and thus the caveats stand discharged. FAO No.128/2014 & CM Nos. 7778-79/2014 1. This first appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule ...
Ramkaran Thr. Parokar Sushila Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 05.2014 + CRL.A. 738 of 2013 RAMKARAN THR. PAROKAR SUSHILA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Sharma, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. CRL.A. 750 of 2013 HUNNY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.C. Budhiraja, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. CRL.A. 848 of 2013 GOVIND @ GOVINDA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. P.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: Crl. A. Nos.738, 750 & 848 of 2013 ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 25.04.2005 at about 9.45 pm, PCR was informed that a quarrel had taken place at Pandav Nagar, Main Road. The information, when conveyed to Police Station Pandav Nagar, was recorded vid...
Hunny Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 05.2014 + CRL.A. 738 of 2013 RAMKARAN THR. PAROKAR SUSHILA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Sharma, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. CRL.A. 750 of 2013 HUNNY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.C. Budhiraja, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. CRL.A. 848 of 2013 GOVIND @ GOVINDA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. P.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. with Appellant in person. Versus STATE Through: Crl. A. Nos.738, 750 & 848 of 2013 ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP with Complainant in person. Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 25.04.2005 at about 9.45 pm, PCR was informed that a quarrel had taken place at Pandav Nagar, Main Road. The information, when conveyed to Police Station Pandav Nagar, was recorded vid...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »