Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 20 of about 438 results (0.023 seconds)Rajeev Kumar and anr Vs. Microsoft Corporation and anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:20. h May, 2014. + FAO(OS) 233/2014, CM No.8270/2014 (for stay) and CM No.8271/2014 (for condonation of 116 days delay in filing the appeal) RAJEEV KUMAR & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. N. Mahabir, Mr. Rajneesh Kumar Singh & Mr. Govind Chaturvedi, Advs. Versus MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajgopala & Ms. Safia Said, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the order dated 1st May, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court (exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction) of dismissal of I.A. No.6928/2014 filed by the appellants/defendants in CS(OS) No.2471/2013 filed by the respondents/plaintiffs.2. The respondents/plaintiffs filed the suit from which this appeal arises for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the appellants/defendants from reproducing...
Tag this Judgment!Holland Company Lp and anr Vs. S.P. Industries
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h May, 2014. % + CS(OS) 160/2013 HOLLAND COMPANY LP & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Varun Eknath, Advocate. Versus S.P. INDUSTRIES Through: ..... Defendant Mr. J.M. Kalia and Mr. D.V. Singh, Advocates. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.1375/2013 (of the plaintiffs u/O39R-1&2 CPC).1. The two plaintiffs have instituted the suit, (i) for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale Automatic Twist Locks and parts thereof by using the knowhow information, drawings, designs, specifications and product information of the plaintiff no.1, amounting to infringement of the copyright of the plaintiff no.1 therein; (ii) for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale Automatic Twist Locks and parts thereof by using the industrial drawings, designs, specifications and product information supplied by the plaintiffs to th...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan Kumar Kohli Vs. Suesh Kumar Kohli and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~R-41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :07.5.2014 Judgment delivered on :20.05.2014 CRL.A. 142/2006 PAWAN KUMAR KOHLI Through ..... Appellant Appellant in person. versus SUESH KUMAR KOHLI AND ANR. Through ..... Respondents Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 22.3.2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge which had set aside the order passed by the learned M.M. dated 31.7.2003. Learned M.M. on the complaint filed by the appellant (Pawan Kumar Kohli) under Section 499 of the IPC had convicted the respondent (Sudesh Kumar Kohli) and had held him guilty under Section 500 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo SI for a period of 6 months. The impugned judgment had reversed the order of the Magistrate and had acquitted the respondent. This judgment is the subject matter of the present appeal. 2 ...
Tag this Judgment!Saint Soldier Modern Senior Secondary School Vs. Regional Provident Fu ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on May 20, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2839/2014 SAINT SOLDIER MODERN SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S.K.Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advocate versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.R.C.Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated October 29, 2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal in short) in appeal No.A.T.A. 685 (11) 2010, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated April 20, 2007 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Amritsar under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (Act in short), was dismissed on the ground that the appeal was barred by limitation.2. Even though, I may state here that the Tribunal has made some observations on the merits of the case,...
Tag this Judgment!Dharmender Kumar Sharma Vs. the Chairman, Rajya Sabha Secretariat and ...
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 05.2014 + W.P.(C) 3153/2014 DHARMENDER KUMAR SHARMA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN, RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Zubeda Begum, Ms. Vaneesa Singh, Mr. Sumeet Batra and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J CM No.6568/2014 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3153/2014 1. This a writ petition filed to assail the orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority dated 28.12.2011, and the order passed by the appellate authority dated 15.10.2012, whereby petitioners appeal against the order of the Disciplinary Authority, stands dismissed.2. The petitioner, who was at the relevant time, a senior clerk in the Rajya Sabha Secretariat was served with a memorandum dated 19.10.2009, in which, it was alleg...
Tag this Judgment!Ctci Overseas Corporation Ltd Vs. Director of Income Tax-i, Internatio ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 05.2014 W.P.(C) 4302/2013 & CM99962013 CTCI OVERSEAS CORPORATION LTD ... Petitioner versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Deepak Chopra with Mr Harpreet Singh Ajmani : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Ruchir Bhatia CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the conclusion of the Authority for Advance Rulings in its ruling dated 01.02.2012, whereby it held that there existed an association of persons (AOP) between the petitioner (CTCI Overseas Corporation Limited, Hongkong) and CINDA Engineering and Construction Private Limited, India in terms of the consortium agreement dated 06.03.2009.2. Insofar as the alternative prayer questioning the jurisdiction...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Yadav and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
#24 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3210/2014 & CM APPL. 6681/2014 MANISH YADAV AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Puneet Yadav with Mr. Amit, Shana, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for R-1. Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate for R-3. Date of Decision :20. h May, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:a) Issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction in the nature of a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to report the vacant seats left out after conducting 2 nd round of counselling and also seats allotted but not joined by or resigned by the candidates after 1 st and 2nd round of counselling of Diplomat of National BoardJanuary, 2014 session: b) Issue an appropriate Writ/Order or Direction in the nature of a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to conduct an extended...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Singh Chawla Alias NaraIn Singh Chawla Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO1822006 20th May, 2014 NARENDER SINGH CHAWLA ALIAS NARAIN SINGH CHAWLA ......Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl and Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advocates. VERSUS STATE & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. H.N.Singh, Mr. Assem Malhotra and Mr. Dewan Singh Chauhan, Advocates for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 by the objector Narender Singh Chawla @ Narain Singh Chawla against the impugned judgment of the probate court dated 16.5.2006 which has allowed the probate petition filed by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 herein. By the impugned judgment dated 16.5.2006, respondent nos. 1 and 2/petitioners have been granted a probate with respect to the Will dated 30.10.1982 executed by the father of the respondent no.2 and the father-in-law of respondent no.3 namely one Sh. Sardar Singh. Sh. ...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Singh and Others Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Ministr ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Dalip Singh, Judicial Member: 1. The case in hand being O.A. No. 16/2014, was originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation/Writ Petition bearing No. 7988/2005 before the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench by the four Applicants with the prayer that the record pertaining to allotment and grant of mining leases to Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 in Khasra Nos. 155, 157 and 207/1 situated at village Hasampur, Tehsil Neem-Ka-Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan be re-examined on the ground that the land in the aforesaid Khasra Nos. comprises pasture land and is a part of the Aravali Range and therefore the mining leases granted to them be revoked. 2. The Hon'ble High Court vide its order dated 29th September, 2005 directed notices to be issued to the Respondent and after service the Respondents submitted their reply more particularly the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and the Respondent No. 6/SPCB filed separate replies. The Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 also submitted their replies to the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Khem Chand Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2958/2014 & CM No.6149/2014 Date of decision:20. h May, 2014 % KHEM CHAND Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Raman Duggal, Mr. Sudhir Kumar and Mr. Anish Shresta, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, ASC with Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. with R.P. Sharma, GI/STA and Mr. Ram Narain, GI STA. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 19th December, 2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting his application being O.A.No.2068/2012.2. The facts giving rise to the instant petition are largely undisputed and to the extent necessary are noticed hereafter. WP(C) No.2958/2014 page 1 of 19 3. We have called for the original record of the respondents and carefully perused the same.4. A requisition was made by the Government of NCT of Delhi respondent no.1 herein to the Delhi Subordinate ...
Tag this Judgment!