Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Anita Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.2496/2014 and CM No.5177/2014 ANITA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.WP(C) No.2496/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated November 28, 2013 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF illegally and erroneously re-fixing the pay of the petitioner to his detriment; as well as the action of the respondents in seeking to recover amounts from his salary pursuant to the pay refixed vide the aforesaid order.2. The relevant facts are that pursuant to the recruitment drive held in the year 2003, the petitioner joined the CRPF in the rank of Head Constable (Min.) on August 14, 2003 and upon joining the force, the petitioner was given a pay scale of Rs. 3200-85-4900 and accordingly the b...
Tag this Judgment!Syed Mohd. Jawed Alam Vs. the General Manager Northern Railways and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2014
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 736/2014 & CM No.1477/2014 Date of decision:20. h May, 2014 % SYED MOHD. JAWED ALAM ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. versus THE GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAYS & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. J.K. Singh and Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. By a separate order, we have dismissed the writ petition. We now pen down our reasons for doing so.2. The petitioner challenges the order dated 25th April, 2012 whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the O.A.No.3581/2011 filed by him. The petitioner was aggrieved by the order dated 22nd February, 2011 passed by the respondents accepting the petitioners request for voluntary retirement with WP(C) No.736/2014 page 1 of 13 immediate effect after deleting the allegations made by him in an application for voluntary retirement. Before the Tribunal, he sought quashing of...
Tag this Judgment!Lalit Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.2494/2014 and CM No.5171/2014 LALIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.WP(C) No.2494/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated January 09, 2014 passed by the Inspector General of Police, CRPF illegally and erroneously re-fixing the pay of the petitioner to his detriment; as well as the action of the respondents in seeking to recover amounts from his salary pursuant to the pay re-fixed vide the aforesaid order.2. The relevant facts are that pursuant to the recruitment drive held in the year 2003, the petitioner joined the CRPF in the rank of Head Constable (Min.) on July 18, 2003 and upon joining the force, the petitioner was given a pay scale of Rs. 3200-85-4900 and accordingl...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd Vs. Vikas Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2014
$~ 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 217/2011 % Judgment dated 20.05.2014 M/S HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate versus VIKAS GARG Through: ..... Defendant Mr.Jinendra Jain and Mr.B.N. Gaur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) IA. No.1704/2013 1. This is an application seeking condonation of 13 days delay in re-filing the application for summons for judgment.2. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay in re-filing the application for summons for judgment is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of. IA. No.1703/2013 4. This is an application for summons for judgment. Since the leave to defend application has already been filed, the present application stands disposed of. IA. No.5765/2013 5. This is an application for condonation of 22 days delay in filing the application for leave to defend.6. Heard. For the reasons stated in...
Tag this Judgment!Gulshan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.2615/2014 and CM No.5422/2014 GULSHAN SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.WP(C) No.2615/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated November 28, 2013 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF illegally and erroneously re-fixing the pay of the petitioner to his detriment; as well as the action of the respondents in seeking to recover amounts from his salary pursuant to the pay refixed vide the aforesaid order.2. The relevant facts are that pursuant to the recruitment drive held in the year 2003, the petitioner joined the CRPF in the rank of Head Constable (Min.) on August 08, 2003 and upon joining the force, the petitioner was given a pay scale of Rs. 3200-85-4900 and accordin...
Tag this Judgment!Sudesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.2614/2014 and CM No.5420/2014 SUDESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.WP(C) No.2614/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated November 28, 2013 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF illegally and erroneously re-fixing the pay of the petitioner to his detriment; as well as the action of the respondents in seeking to recover amounts from his salary pursuant to the pay refixed vide the aforesaid order.2. The relevant facts are that pursuant to the recruitment drive held in the year 2003, the petitioner joined the CRPF in the rank of Head Constable (Min.) on August 01, 2003 and upon joining the force, the petitioner was given a pay scale of Rs. 3200-85-4900 and accordingl...
Tag this Judgment!H.C./Ro S.S. Suhag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.2654/2014 and CM No.5521/2014 H.C./RO S.S. SUHAG & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.WP(C) No.2654/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the signal dated April 2, 2014 and the un-communicated signal dated 7th April, 2014 whereby the respondents have illegally and erroneously re-fixed the pay of the petitioners to their detriment as per fitment table pursuant to the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission; as well as the action of the respondents in seeking to recover amounts from their salary pursuant to the pay re-fixed vide the aforesaid signals.2. The relevant facts are that pursuant to the recruitment drive held in the year 2003, the petitioners were directly recruited in the CRPF to...
Tag this Judgment!Vijay Kumar Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2014
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : May 05, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : May 19, 2014 + W.P.(C) 16560/2004 & CM No.3789/2014 VIJAY KUMAR Represented by: UOI & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate versus .....Respondents Mr.Pulkit Sharma, Advocate with Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj and Mr.Prasouk Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The writ petition had reached for final hearing on March 13, 2014 and since none appeared for the petitioner Court notice was directed to be issued and served upon learned counsel for the petitioner informing him that the writ petition would be taken up for final hearing on May 05, 2014. Learned counsel for the petitioner was served. Before May 05, 2014, he filed CM No.3789/2014 praying that additional documents filed along with the application may be taken on record. On March 20, 2014 it was directed that said application would be take...
Tag this Judgment!Keshav Chander Thakur and anr. Vs. Krishan Chander and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : April 16,2014 Judgment Pronounced on : May 19, 2014 + RFA(OS) 86/2013 KESHAV CHANDER THAKUR & ANR. .... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Keshav Thakur, Ms.Noor Anand, Mr.Bhupesh Narula and Mr.Sarfaraz Ahmed, Advocates. versus KRISHAN CHANDER & ORS. .... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Samar Singh Kachwaha, Advocate with Mr.Raghvendra Mohan Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present appeal is filed challenging the order dated May 24,2013 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the application filed by defendant No.1/respondent No.1 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, being IA No.13394/2011, was allowed and the plaint was rejected.2. The appellants filed the suit seeking a decree for partition of properties B-11, Krishna Niwas, West End Colony, New Delhi and 245-A, Puran Nagar, Jammu (Tawi), Jammu and ...
Tag this Judgment!Gaurav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : April 23, 2014 DECIDED ON : May 19, 2014 + CRL.A. 151/2012 & CRL.M.B. 1626/2013 GAURAV Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Nilender Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Pawan Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A. 161/2012 AMARJEET @ VAID Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Sahil Ahuja, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. AND + CRL.A. 162/2012 HANS GAURAV @ TANNU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Nitin Joshi, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Gaurav (A-1), Amarjeet @ Vaid (A-2) and Hans Gaurav @ Tannu (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 07.12.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.03/10 arising out of FIR No.190/09 registered at Police Station Dwarka by which A-1 and A-3 under Section 395 IPC; and A-2 under Section 412 IPC were held guilty...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »