Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Urmila Devi Vs. Department of Women and Child Development
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2014
$~15 to 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA3862014 Date of decision:23. d May, 2014 % URMILA DEVI Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. versus DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Raavi Birbal, Adv. + LPA3872014 RAJ BALA Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Varun Prasad, Adv. versus DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Raavi Birbal, Adv. + LPA3882014 BANARAS GODARA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. versus DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Raavi Birbal, Adv. + LPA3892014 RAM CHANDRI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. versus DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Raavi Birbal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(ORAL) C.M.No.9042/2014 in L.P.A.No.386/2014, C.M.No.9044/2014 in LPA No.387/2014 C.M.No.9046/2014 in LPA no.388/2014 C.M.No.9048/2014 in LPA no.389/...
Pranesh Gupta and anr Vs. Jagdish Bansilal Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2014
$~ 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1979/2011 % Judgment dated 23.05.2014 PRANESH GUPTA & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Vaishali Kakra and Mr.Ifran Ahmed, Advocates versus JAGDISH BANSILAL KHURANA Through: ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.9,93,27,786.68/against the defendant.2. In the order dated 10.10.2013 Joint Registrar has noticed that affidavit of service has been filed, postal cover sent to the defendants have been received back undelivered either with the refusal report or unclaimed. The defendant was served through publication in the daily Newspaper Lok Satta, Mumbai Edition dated 2.5.2013. The defendant was proceeded ex parte on 18.11.2013. Plaintiff was directed to file ex parte evidence. Plaintiff has filed the evidence of Sh.Pranesh Gupta (plaintiff No.1 / PW1).3. PW-1 has deposed that he is one of the partners of plaintiff No.2. The true copies of ...
Amrendra Kumar Vs. Registrar General, Delhi High Court and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITON (C)No.1819/2014 % Reserved on :20. h May, 2014 Date of Decision:23. d May, 2014 AMRENDRA KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Lalit Kumar Jha, Advocate. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT & ORS ..Respondents Through Mr. Rajshekhar Rao and Ms. Zehra Khan, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3, UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: On 18th February, 2014, an advertisement/recruitment notification was issued for conducting Delhi Judicial Service Examination, 2014 in respect of 80 vacancies [General-55, SC-08 (1 backlog) and ST-17 (15 backlog)].. A note to the said recruitment notification reads:- Note: Out of the aforesaid 80 vacancies, 02 vacancies (backlog) are reserved for Physically Handicapped (Blind/Low Vision) (mobility not to be restricted) candidates. 2. On or about 18th March, 2014, the petitioner-Amrendra Kumar filed the ...
Anees Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h May, 2014 Pronounced on:23. d May, 2014 + CRL. A. 320/1998 ANEES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shahid Azad, Advocate with Mohd. Aslam, Advocate and Mr. Shabana Ahmed, Advocate. Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellant Anees impugns the judgment and the order on sentence dated 28.07.1998 passed in Sessions Case No.176/ 1996 arising out of FIR No.728/ 1995 whereby he was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) for committing murder of his wife Saira and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant was directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. Facts leading to the registration of FIR No.728/ 1995, Police Stat...
Kiran Arora Vs. Sandeep Poshwal and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2014
$~ 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 968/2011 % Judgment dated 23.05.2014 KIRAN ARORA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.A.K. Sen, Advocate versus SANDEEP POSHWAL & ORS ..... Defendant Through: Dr.Surat Singh and Ms.Aishwarya Jain, Advocates for applicant in I.A. 512/2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the main relief is against the defendants no.1 and 2, who are interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff. Plaintiff prays that the present suit be decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC as despite being granted repeated opportunities, the defendants failed to file their written statement. After service, the defendants had entered appearance on 28.7.2011 and sought time to file the written statement. As written statement was not filed, further time was granted to the defendants on 28.7.2011 to file the written statement. Final oppor...
Sunil Arora Vs. V.K. Vadhera
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2014
$~ 62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1506/2014 % Judgment dated 23.05.2014 SUNIL ARORA Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms.Shivali Bansal, Advocate versus V.K. VADHERA Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 27.11.1991 in respect to property bearing No.4, Block B-1, Phase-II, Ashok Vihar, Delhi. A decree of permanent injunction is also sought. Counsel for the plaintiff was requested to address arguments on the question of limitation, as on a bare reading of the plaint the Court was of the view that the present suit was hopelessly barred by limitation.2. The facts of the case as stated by the plaintiff in the plaint are that the plaintiff is one of the legal representatives of deceased, Sh.Des Raj Arora. The said Sh.Des Raj Arora had been authorized by a special power of attorney by other legal representatives to institute the present suit....
Firoz and Another Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h MAY, 2014 DECIDED ON :22. d MAY, 2014 + CRL.A. 512/2011 FIROZ AND ANOTHER Through : ..... Appellants Mr.Sunil Tiwari, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to a conviction recorded by a judgment dated 19.02.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.63/2008 arising out of FIR No.93/2008 PS New Usmanpur under Sections 392/394/397/34 IPC. By an order dated 17.03.2011, the appellants were awarded various prison terms with fine.2. Allegations against the appellants as projected in the charge- sheet were that on the night intervening 18/19.04.2008 at about 12.30 A.M. at 2nd pushta, Khajuri, they with their associate Robin (facing trial before Juvenile Board) robbed complainant Narender Singh Rawat of `380/- at knife point and inflicted injuries to him. Police machinery was set in motion when incident wa...
Smt. Radhesh Singh Vs. Vineet Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d May, 2014. % + CS(OS) 1938/2008 SMT. RADHESH SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Adv. Versus VINEET SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath & Ms. Avsi Malik, Advs. for D-1 to 3. Mr. Naaren Nath Survaria, Adv. for D-3. Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee and Ms. Shreya Som, Advs. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.13523/2008 (of D-1 to 3 u/O7R-11 CPC) 1. The plaintiff, on 15th September, 2008 has filed this suit, (i) for declaration that the Compromise Decree dated 31 st May, 1984 in Suit No.335/1982 of this Court has become unexecutable and unenforceable in law and is of no consequence; (ii) for partition of property No.17, Rajdoot Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, claiming a 50% share therein; and, (iii) for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the said property or disturbing the possession of the plaintiff thereof, pleading: (a) that the father of ...
Shri Sapan Chopra and anr. Vs. M/S Ultimate Builders and Developer (P) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : May 12, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : May 22, 2014 + RFA (OS) 146/2013 SHRI SAPAN CHOPRA & ANR. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Yadav, Advocate with Ms.Ruchira, Advocate versus M/S ULTIMATE BUILDERS AND DEVELOPER (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.R.L.Kohli, Advocate with Mr.Varun Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Sapan Chopra son of Late Sh.V.K.Chopra and his mother Madhu Chopra are the owners of plot bearing Municipal No.72, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi on which a 2 storeyed building exists. Desirous of refurbishing by carrying out extensive repairs, additions and alterations in the existing building, and having no finances to do so, Sapan and his mother Madhu entered into an agreement, Ex.P-1 on August 11, 2004, with M/s.Ultimate Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Sh.Subhash Gupta. As per the agr...
Kartar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2014
17 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1765/2014 & CM APPLs. 3681/2014 AND52362014 KARTAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash Gupta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Hashmat Nabi, Advocate with Mr. Chanchal Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Pradeep Dewan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anupam Dhingra, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Vinod Tomar, Assistant Secretary, WFI. Date of Decision :22. d May, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. In a writ petition filed by Punjab Wrestling Association being W.P.(C) 2932/2013, this Court with consent of parties, had directed fresh election of the Executive Council of Punjab Wrestling Association on 25 th May, 2014 under the supervision of retired Mr. Justice S.N. Dhingra.2. Today, with consent of parties, the Expulsion Resolution dated 23 rd April, 2013 passed by the General Council of Wrestling Federation of India whereby the petitioner wa...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »