Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 15 of about 540 results (0.022 seconds)Dalip Vs. State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 19, 2014 DECIDED ON : February 21, 2014 + CRL.A. 1343/2012 & Crl.M.B.No.406/2014 DALIP ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sandeep Thakur, Advocate. VERSUS STATE GNCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 2.11.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.40/11 arising out of FIR No.134/11 registered at Police Station Nabi Karim by which the appellant-Dalip was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 315/323 IPC and awarded rigorous imprisonment for five years under Section 315 and rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 323 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. The prosecution case, as projected in the charge-sheet, was that in a quarrel on 04.08.2011, Dalip hit a leg blow on the stomach of his sister-in-law Reena with an intention to prevent the ...
Tag this Judgment!Lt.Col.B.M.Khosla Vs. Col.S.K.Khosla (Retd.) and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 21, 2014 + RFA (OS) 53/2013 Lt.COL.B.M.KHOSLA Represented by: .....Appellant Appellant in person versus COL.S.K.KHOSLA (RETD.) & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajiv K.Garg, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Garg, Advocate for R-1 Mr.G.Kandpal, Advocate with Mr.G.Joshi, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The undernoted chart is indicative of the litigative attitude of the appellant. He has lost at every stage. But his appetite for litigation does not come to an end. The chart we have just referred to would be as under:- Case No.C.R.P.No.621/2001 C.R.P.No.622/201 C.R.P.No.623/2001 C.R.P.No.624/2001 C.R.P.No.625/2001 RFA (OS) 53/2013 Particulars Date disposal B.M.K.Khosla vs.Trustees 13.9.2001 Employees Provident Fund B.M.K.Khosla vs.Trustees 13.9.2001 Employees Provident Fund B.M.K.Khosla vs.Trustees 13.9.2001 Employees Provident Fund...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S. Xps Cargo Servic ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.472/2013 21st February, 2014 % UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR. .... Appellants Through: Mr. R. K. Ram, Advocate. Versus M/S. XPS CARGO SERVICES Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.1. /2014 Counsel for the appellants states that he has filed an application for condonation of delay in terms of the liberty given on 26.9.2013. Let the appellant place this application on record. Registry to number the same therafter. Delay in filing of the appeal is condoned for the reason that time spent earlier was for a wrong proceeding being a civil revision petition instead of filing of an appeal. C.M. stands disposed of. + FAO No.472/2013 2. This first appeal under Order 43(1) (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenges the judgment of the Court below dated 25.7.2012 which returned the plaint for presentation to the...
Tag this Judgment!Groz-beckert Asia Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :21. 02.2014 + W.P.(C) 1198/2014, C.M. APPL. 2499/2014 GROZ-BECKERT ASIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Virag Tiwari and Sh. K.J.Bhat, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Sh. B.V. Niren, Advocate, for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Government dated 23.09.2013, setting-aside the Commissioner (Appeal)s determination in its favour. The petitioner had imported 58,00,000 pieces of sewing needles for the purpose of re-export between May and August 2011. It cleared the goods against payment of duty to the tune of `30.96 lakhs after declaring that the goods were brought in for re-export. It asserted that after importation, the needles were removed from grey dispensers, each containing 10 needles and changed to orange dispensers manually. The import W.P.(C)1...
Tag this Judgment!Rajinder Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 02.2014 Crl Appeal no.459/2010 + TEJ SINGH @ TEJA .Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Crl Appeal no.700/2010 RAJINDER STATE .Appellant Through: Ms. Alpana Pandey, Adv. with appellant in person Versus .Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Crl Appeal no.701/2010 VIJAY KUMAR .Appellant Through: Ms. Alpana Pandey, Adv. with appellant in person Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) In the night intervening 13/14.04.2004, the dead body of a person aged about 25-26 years was found on the Service Road behind Ambedkar College Park in the jurisdiction of Police Station Shahdara. The information in this regard was recorded at Police Station Shahdara vide DD no.40A which was given to Inspector N.P. Singh, SHO of the aforesaid police station for investigation. He reached th...
Tag this Judgment!M/S North Delhi Power Limited Now Tata Power Delhi Vs. Tilak Raj
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 20, 2014 Judgment pronounced on: February 21, 2014 + W.P.(C) 4631/2013 M/S NORTH DELHI POWER LIMITED NOW TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Sujit Kr. Singh, Advocate versus TILAK RAJ Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Salim Inamdar, Advocate with Mr.Vibhor Kush, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge by the petitioner is to the award of the Labour Court dated May 23, 2013 in I.D No.529/2010 whereby the Tribunal has set aside the transfer of the respondent from Keshav Puram to Karala, District Bawana, Delhi vide order dated October 14, 2009 as mala fide, illegal and unjustified with a further direction to transfer the respondent back to his original place of posting.2. The respondent at the relevant time while working as Junior Engineer was transferred vide order dated October 14, 2009 from Kesh...
Tag this Judgment!AmruddIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t February, 2014 + CRL.A. 832/2011 AMRUDDIN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Appellant Amruddin has been charged under Section 302 IPC for murder of his wife Mst. Rehana by strangulating her with a towel/gamcha. He was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge u/s 302 IPC in Sessions Case No.24/2010 arising out of FIR No.357/2009 registered with PS Kotwali and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two years.2. The factual scenario emerging from the record of this case is that on 22nd December, 2009 at 10:57 p.m., DD No.39A was lodged at PS Kotwali regarding quarrel in building No.2077, Gali Paranthe Wali/ Gali Pagri Wali, Chand...
Tag this Judgment!Tej Singh @ Teja Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 02.2014 Crl Appeal no.459/2010 + TEJ SINGH @ TEJA .Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Crl Appeal no.700/2010 RAJINDER STATE .Appellant Through: Ms. Alpana Pandey, Adv. with appellant in person Versus .Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP Crl Appeal no.701/2010 VIJAY KUMAR .Appellant Through: Ms. Alpana Pandey, Adv. with appellant in person Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) In the night intervening 13/14.04.2004, the dead body of a person aged about 25-26 years was found on the Service Road behind Ambedkar College Park in the jurisdiction of Police Station Shahdara. The information in this regard was recorded at Police Station Shahdara vide DD no.40A which was given to Inspector N.P. Singh, SHO of the aforesaid police station for investigation. He reached th...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Meena and ors. Vs. Sh. Somvir and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. t February, 2014 MAC.APP. No.1238/2012 SMT. MEENA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate Versus SH. SOMVIR & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 14.08.2010 whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.11,48,176/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants/claimants are seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. Brief facts of the case are that on 14.05.2010 at about 1.30 PM when Sh. Gaffar Khan, @ Gabru @ Mullah along with one Rakesh Kumar was coming to Delhi in Tempo from Dabai (U.P.) and when they reached Sadak Pusta, Village Jatpura (U.P.), a bus bearing No....
Tag this Judgment!Sushila Vs. Rajesh Bhatia and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. t February, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 725/2006 SUSHILA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Mahavir Sharma, Ms.Vandana Anand and Mr.Ashish Dhingra, Advocates. Versus RAJESH BHATIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ramesh Kumar and Mr.Ajay Singh, Advocates for Respondent No.3/ Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. It is noted that the cause title of the appeal wrongly shows Sushila & Ors. Vs. Rajesh Bhatia & Ors., however, there is only one appellant/injured. Hence, the same be read as Sushila Vs. Rajesh Bhatia & Ors..2. dated The present appeal is filed against the impugned award 30.05.2006, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.2,58,355/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount. However, the appellant is entitled for an amount of Rs.1,29,178/- with interest as noted above...
Tag this Judgment!