Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 10 of about 540 results (0.021 seconds)Cit Vs. Uniword Telecom Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:25. 02.2014 + ITA2692011, CM APPL.14021/2012 (XOBJ) CIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.Akash Vajpai, Advocate. versus UNIWORD TELECOM LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor with Mr. Vikas Jain, Mr. Sanat Kapoor and Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. In this appeal of the Revenue, an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29th January, 2010, in Appeal No.641/DL/2009 has been challenged. The Revenue urges the following questions of law, i.e. a) Whether ITAT was justified in restricting the number of parties from whom bogus purchases were said to have been resorted to by the assessee?. ; ITA2692011 Page 1 2. b) Did the Tribunal fall into error in directing disallowance to the extent of only 10% of purchases made from such vendors by the assessee?. The as...
Tag this Judgment!Disney Enterprises,inc and anr Vs. Dhiraj and anr
Court: Delhi
$~ 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: February 25, 2014 + CS(OS) 1025/2012 DISNEY ENTERPRISES,INC & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Aditya Kutty, Advocate versus DHIRAJ & ANR Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademarks and copyrights, passing off, dilution, damages, rendition of accounts of profits and delivery up.2. Summons were issued in the suit and in the application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 the following interim order was passed on 18.4.2012:I have heard counsel for the plaintiffs and also perused the plaint, application and the documents filed along with the present plaint. I am satisfied that it is a fit case for grant of for ex parte ad interim injunction. Accordingly, till the next date of hearing, defendants, their principal officers, Directors, agents, franchisees, servant...
Tag this Judgment!SachIn Gupta Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 Crl. A. No.563 of 2010 % + SACHIN GUPTA Through: .Appellant Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. Versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1. + Crl. A. No.567 of 2010 GLITTER GOLD PLANTATION LTD. & ORS. .Appellants Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-2. + Crl. A. No.573 of 2010 YASHWANT JAIN Through: .Appellant Mr. Prag Chawla, Adv. Versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The appellant No.1 in Crl. A. No.567/2010, Glitter Gold Plantation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company), came to be incorporated on 31.1.1997 and appellants 2 & 3, Pankaj Jain & Deepak Jain are its Directors. The app...
Tag this Judgment!Glitter Gold Plantation Ltd. and ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 Crl. A. No.563 of 2010 % + SACHIN GUPTA Through: .Appellant Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. Versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1. + Crl. A. No.567 of 2010 GLITTER GOLD PLANTATION LTD. & ORS. .Appellants Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-2. + Crl. A. No.573 of 2010 YASHWANT JAIN Through: .Appellant Mr. Prag Chawla, Adv. Versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The appellant No.1 in Crl. A. No.567/2010, Glitter Gold Plantation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company), came to be incorporated on 31.1.1997 and appellants 2 & 3, Pankaj Jain & Deepak Jain are its Directors. The app...
Tag this Judgment!Vikram Singh and anr. Vs. Ajit Inder Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On: January 16, 2014 Judgment Delivered On: February 24, 2014 + RFA(OS) 87/2012 VIKRAM SINGH & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Appellant No.1 in person versus AJIT INDER SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajiv Sawhney, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Arjun Singh Bawa, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Late Col.Inderjeet Singh, the husband of the respondent Ms.Ajit Inder Singh, filed a suit for partition against his sister Ms.Anant Verinder Singh (mother of the appellants) pleading that property bearing Municipal No.D57, Defence Colony, New Delhi was owned by their late father Gurcharan Singh who died in June, 1968 leaving behind his wife Ms.K.Gurcharan Singh, his son Col.Inderjeet Singh and his daughter Ms.Anant Verinder Singh as the legal heirs. The three inherited the property, the mother having 2/3rd share and the two siblings 1/3rd ...
Tag this Judgment!Farid Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 CRL.A. 181/2013 IKRAM ANSARI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 330/2013 USMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Imran Ali, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 398/2013 MEHFOOZ ISLAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Malhotra, Mr. K.K. Bhalla and Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Crl.Appeal nos.181/2013&connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for + CRL.A. 642/2013 FARID ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 709/2013 NADIM @ MATIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Resp...
Tag this Judgment!Steelbird Hi-tech India Ltd. Vs. S.P.S. Gambhir and ors.
Court: Delhi
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on: February 24, 2014 I.A. Nos.19671/2013 & 596/2014 in CS(OS) No.2407/2013 STEELBIRD HI-TECH INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Diva Arora and Mr.Rajat Katiyar, Advs. versus S.P.S. GAMBHIR & ORS Through ..... Defendants Ms.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bitika Singh and Mr.Kapil Midha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of design under Registration No.241153, passing off, rendition of accounts, damages etc. The said suit was listed along with IA No.19671/2013 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC wherein this Court passed the interim order. Upon service, the defendants have filed reply to the interim application and also filed an application being I.A. No.596/2014 under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for vacation of the ex parte ad-interim order passed on 6th December, 2013. Case of...
Tag this Judgment!New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Fateh Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on February 20, 2014 Judgment Delivered on February 24, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2162/2011 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate versus FATEH SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Nirmal Mishra, Mr. Chaman Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition by the New Delhi Municipal Council is to the award dated August 01, 2009 passed in I.D. No.332/09 by the Labour Court whereby the Labour Court has held that the termination of the respondent is in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act, in short) and directed his reinstatement without any back wages.2. The brief facts are, it was the case of the respondent that he was in the employment of the petitioner w.e.f. April 01, 1982 as Maali on daily wage basis. According to him, the petitioner employed persons as Maali on permanent basis and pa...
Tag this Judgment!M.Narsimhan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : February 24, 2014 + CRL.A.851/2012 M.NARSIMHAN ..... Appellant Through : Mr.J.S.Kushwaha, Advocate with the appellant produced in judicial custody. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. SI Pramod Kumar, PS Subhash Place. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal today itself.2. M.Narsimhan (the appellant) is aggrieved by the judgment dated 22.11.2010 in Sessions Case No.1178/2009 arising out of FIR No.467/2009 by which he was convicted for committing offence under Section 392/34 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 27.11.2010, he was awarded RI for five years with fine `10,000/-. Allegations against the appellant were that on 31.08.2009 at about 03.40 p.m. at Inner Ring Road near F-Block Bus Stand, Shakur Pur, Delhi, he and his associate robbed Ramu Gupta (complainant) and deprived him of his purse containing `9,500/...
Tag this Judgment!Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h February, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1235/2014, C.M. APPL. 2576/2014 SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Deepak Chopra, Sh. Harpreet Singh and Sh. Amit Shrivastava, Advocates. versus ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Rohit Madan, Sh. Akash Vajpai and Sh. P. Roy Choudhry, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 1178/2014, C.M. APPL. 2465/2014 SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) PVT.LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Deepak Chopra, Sh. Harpreet Singh and Sh. Amit Shrivastava, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar and Sh. Raghvendra Singh, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.WP(C) 1178/2014 This writ petition has been filed by Sony Mobile communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Sony Mobile hereafter) a company which has now merged with Sony...
Tag this Judgment!