Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt.Ltd Vs. Additional Commissioner ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h February, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1235/2014, C.M. APPL. 2576/2014 SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Deepak Chopra, Sh. Harpreet Singh and Sh. Amit Shrivastava, Advocates. versus ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Rohit Madan, Sh. Akash Vajpai and Sh. P. Roy Choudhry, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 1178/2014, C.M. APPL. 2465/2014 SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) PVT.LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Deepak Chopra, Sh. Harpreet Singh and Sh. Amit Shrivastava, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar and Sh. Raghvendra Singh, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.WP(C) 1178/2014 This writ petition has been filed by Sony Mobile communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Sony Mobile hereafter) a company which has now merged with Sony...
Amit Johri Vs. Deepak Johri and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 24, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: February 24, 2014 + RFA (OS) 23/2013 AMIT JOHRI Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Rajiv K.Garg, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Garg, Advocate versus DEEPAK JOHRI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.S.Shantanu, Advocate for R-1, R-7, R-8 and R-9 Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Shalini Kapoor, Ms.Promil Seth and Ms.Kriti Arora, Advocates for R-11 and R-12 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The appellant Amit Johri son of respondent No.1 K.K.Johri is the plaintiff of CS(OS) No.818/2011. He sought declaration, partition, and possession of 1/6th share in property No.1112, Chhata Madan, Gopal Maliwara, Delhi-110006. Alternatively he prayed for a decree in sum of `50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lacs only).2. To understand his claim we reproduce averments made by him in para 2 to 9 of the plaint. They read as...
AzharuddIn Badar Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 CRL.A. 181/2013 IKRAM ANSARI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 330/2013 USMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Imran Ali, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 398/2013 MEHFOOZ ISLAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Malhotra, Mr. K.K. Bhalla and Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Crl.Appeal nos.181/2013&connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for + CRL.A. 642/2013 FARID ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 709/2013 NADIM @ MATIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Resp...
Usman Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 CRL.A. 181/2013 IKRAM ANSARI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 330/2013 USMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Imran Ali, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 398/2013 MEHFOOZ ISLAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Malhotra, Mr. K.K. Bhalla and Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Crl.Appeal nos.181/2013&connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for + CRL.A. 642/2013 FARID ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 709/2013 NADIM @ MATIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Resp...
Mehfooz Islam Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 CRL.A. 181/2013 IKRAM ANSARI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 330/2013 USMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Imran Ali, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 398/2013 MEHFOOZ ISLAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Malhotra, Mr. K.K. Bhalla and Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Crl.Appeal nos.181/2013&connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for + CRL.A. 642/2013 FARID ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 709/2013 NADIM @ MATIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Resp...
Nadim @ MatIn Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 CRL.A. 181/2013 IKRAM ANSARI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 330/2013 USMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Imran Ali, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 398/2013 MEHFOOZ ISLAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Malhotra, Mr. K.K. Bhalla and Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Crl.Appeal nos.181/2013&connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for + CRL.A. 642/2013 FARID ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 709/2013 NADIM @ MATIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Resp...
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Urmilla Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. h February, 2014 MAC.APP. 415/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Represented by: Adv. ..... Appellant Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Versus URMILLA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 01.03.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.15,89,278/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till notice under Order XXI Rule 1 CPC was given by the appellant / Insurance Company.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that age of the deceased on the date of accident was 27 years and the Ld. Tribunal has added 50% in his actual income towards future prospects contrary to the dictum of Sarla Verma Vs. DTC and Ors. 2009 (6) SCC121 which has been further confirmed by the Full Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Res...
ikram Ansari Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 CRL.A. 181/2013 IKRAM ANSARI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.S. Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 330/2013 USMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Imran Ali, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 398/2013 MEHFOOZ ISLAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Malhotra, Mr. K.K. Bhalla and Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Crl.Appeal nos.181/2013&connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for + CRL.A. 642/2013 FARID ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, APP for State CRL.A. 709/2013 NADIM @ MATIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Resp...
Yashwant JaIn Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 02.2014 Date of Decision:24. 02.2014 Crl. A. No.563 of 2010 % + SACHIN GUPTA Through: .Appellant Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. Versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1. + Crl. A. No.567 of 2010 GLITTER GOLD PLANTATION LTD. & ORS. .Appellants Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-2. + Crl. A. No.573 of 2010 YASHWANT JAIN Through: .Appellant Mr. Prag Chawla, Adv. Versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. .Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The appellant No.1 in Crl. A. No.567/2010, Glitter Gold Plantation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company), came to be incorporated on 31.1.1997 and appellants 2 & 3, Pankaj Jain & Deepak Jain are its Directors. The app...
M/S. Gati Ltd. Vs. Gati Dance Forum/Gati Forum Trust and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: February 24, 2014 + I.A. No.13679/2010 in CS(OS) 2087/2010 M/S GATI LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sandeep Khurana, Adv. versus GATI DANCE FORUM/GATI FORUM TRUST & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Vaibhav Vutts, Adv. with Mr.Shantanu Sood & Ms.Aamna Hasan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants from infringing upon the registered Trade Mark and copyright, mandatory injunction directing the defendants to stop using the plaintiffs registered trade name (Gati), to promote or/and carry out business and for recovery of damages.2. The plaintiff, a company having its registered office at Andhra Pradesh, commenced operations of cargo management services in the year 1989 as Gati Desk to Desk Cargo. It has been stated that now the plaintiff is a full-fledged logistics solutions provider employing more th...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »