Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravinder Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8562/2014 Decided on 05.12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : RAVINDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Advocate for UOI. Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate for R-4/FCI. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 and the order dated 27.01.2014 issued by the respondent No.3/Regional Director (NR) of the Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AGII) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.4/FCI was cancelled and he was debarred for a period of three years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent of the...
Sher Singh Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 05, 2014 + CM(M) 1069/2014 SHER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jyoti Jain, Advocate for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M.No.19945/2014 (u/S151CPC) Exemption allowed as prayed for. Application is disposed of. C.M.(M) No.1069/2014 Petitioners application for release of decretal amount is said to have been pending since January, 2014 and petitioners application for pre-ponement of date of hearing also stands rejected vide order of 8th July, 2014 while observing that due to heavy pendency, early hearing is not possible. Now the next date of hearing before the trial court is 27th January, 2015. CMM No.1069/2014 Page 1 Notice. Ms. Jyoti Jain, Advocate, accepts notice of petition on behalf of respondent-Union of India. Upon hearing and in the facts and circumstances of this case, it is directed ...
N.M. Goel Vs. Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 605/2012 Decided on :5. h December, 2014 N.M. GOEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Arora, Mr.Akshat and Mr.Dhiraj Manchanda, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the order passed by the Division Bench of this court vide order dated 23.02.2012.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and I have also gone through the reply affidavit filed by the respondents including the surrejoinder. The direction passed by the Division Bench are contained in para Nos.5 & 6 of the order dated 23.02.2012. These were as under:5. In so far as the other plea with regard to the computation of the Cost of Living Allowance is concerned, we feel that the Tribunal has cursorily decided this issue against the petitioner, without going...
Union of India & Anr. Vs. Nathu Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
I-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 05, 2014 + LA.APP. 384/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate versus NATHU SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Mrinlani S. Gutam & Ms. Ruchi Chopra, Advocates for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M. No.19970/2014 (under Section 149 CPC r/w Sec. 151 CPC) Learned counsel for appellant undertakes that the deficient court fee would be placed on record within a period of four weeks. While taking the aforesaid undertaking on record, this application is disposed of. C.M. No.19969/2014 (u/S151CPC) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. LA.APP. 384/2014 & C.M. No.19996/2014 (u/O41R5r/w Sec. 151 CPC) LA.APP.384/2014 Page 1 Impugned judgment of 30th August, 2014 grants compensation in respect of acquisition of land in village Burari, Delhi vide Notification of 18th July, 2003, under Section 4 of the La...
Shri Kranti Kumar JaIn Vs. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 3086/2013 & CM No.5850/2013 SHRI KRANTI KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Pankaj Gupta. For the Respondents : Ms Renuka Arora. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns a notice dated 17.09.2012 issued by the DSIIDC (hereafter impugned notice) calling upon the petitioner to pay unearned increase charges amounting to ` 9,72,500/- as well as penalty charges at the rate of 18% per annum amounting to ` 87,285 (hereafter the impugned demand).2. The impugned demand was raised by the DSIIDC pursuant to a request made by the petitioner to record a change in the constitution of the firm, which was allotted the property in question.3. It is stated that the firm M/s Rosy Rubber Industries was constituted...
Kartik Sharma & Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5549/2014 KARTIK SHARMA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with IO/SI Raj Kumar, CAW Cell. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 18940/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5549/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.715/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Shakar Pur on 3rd August, 2013 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well...
Satish Chand Gupta Vs. Mcd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :05. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 157/2011 SATISH CHAND GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. N. Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MCD AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 19.08.2009 in T.A. No.97/2009. They were aggrieved by the action of the respondent (MCD) in withdrawing their regularization orders.2. The petitioners case before the CAT was that they were originally working as daily wage employees at various places for the MCD when, on different dates between 2002 and 2003, orders of regularization were issued in respect of their employment. While so, alleging that there were large scale irregularities and scams - involving forgery and collusion with the officials of MCD, the petitioners service...
Muthurisapillai Ranganathan Vs. Indian National Science Academy & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7062/2014 and CM APPL. 16566 & 16567/2014 Decided on :05. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF MUTHURISAPILLAI RANGANATHAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Nanda Devi Deka & Ms.Deepika Kalia, Advocates versus INDIAN NATIONAL SCIENCE ACADEMY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.K.N.Kataria, Sr.Advocate with Mr.K.P.Mavi, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Dev P.Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj and Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER0512.2014 % 1. Pursuant to the order dated 14.11.2014, the relevant documents have been filed by the petitioner.2. In the course of addressing arguments, Mr.Vikas Singh, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner fairly states that certain reliefs have to be added to the prayer clause for which the petition would have to be amended to lay the foundation of the relief and as the matter is still at the stage of admission, the petitioner may be permit...
R.K. JaIn Vs. Chairman, Income Tax Settlement Commission & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 2939/2014 R.K. JAIN ..... Petitioner versus CHAIRMAN, INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajveer Singh. For the Respondents : Mr P. Roychaudhuri. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner, inter alia, impugns an order dated 14.02.2014 passed by respondent No.3 Central Public Information Officer & Administrative Officer, Income Tax Settlement Commission, denying the information, which was earlier directed to be supplied to the petitioner under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the RTI Act).2. The impugned order indicates that the order dated 26.09.2013 passed by respondent No.2 pursuant to an application filed by the petitioner under the RTI Act; and the order dated 21.10.2013 passed by respondent No.4 in an appeal preferred by the petitioner against the or...
Mohd.Ahmad HussaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02,2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A.438/2014 MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. CRL.A.1580/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. versus MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned decision dated December 14, 2013 Mohd.Ahmad Hussain has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 304 IPC (Part-I or Part-II not stated in the impugned decision); for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC; for the offence punishable under Se...
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »