Sher Singh Vs. Union of India

Sher Singh vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 05, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/837

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/837
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Sunil Gaur
Decided On: Dec 05, 2014
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sher Singh

Advocate Mr. I.S. Dahiya

Respondent

Union of India

Advocate Ms. Jyoti Jain, Mr. Yeeshu Jain

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision: december 05, 2014 + cm(m) 1069/2014 sher singh through: ..... petitioner mr. i.s. dahiya, advocate versus union of india through: ..... respondent ms. jyoti jain, advocate for mr. yeeshu jain, advocate coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur judgment (oral) % c.m.no.19945/2014 (u/s151cpc) exemption allowed as prayed for. application is disposed of. c.m.(m) no.1069/2014 petitioner’s application for release of decretal amount is said to have been pending since january, 2014 and petitioner’s application for pre-ponement of date of hearing also stands rejected vide order of 8th july, 2014 while observing that due to heavy pendency, early hearing is not possible. now the next date of hearing before the trial court is 27th january, 2015. cmm no.1069/2014 page 1 notice. ms. jyoti jain, advocate, accepts notice of petition on behalf of respondent-union of india. upon hearing and in the facts and circumstances of this case, it is directed that petitioner’s application be positively taken up for hearing on the date fixed and if it is not possible to dispose of the said application on the date fixed, then the said application must be disposed of by the trial court within six weeks from the next date fixed. with aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. (sunil gaur) judge december05 2014 r cmm no.1069/2014 page 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 05, 2014 + CM(M) 1069/2014 SHER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jyoti Jain, Advocate for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT

(ORAL) % C.M.No.19945/2014 (u/S151CPC) Exemption allowed as prayed for. Application is disposed of. C.M.(M) No.1069/2014 Petitioner’s application for release of decretal amount is said to have been pending since January, 2014 and petitioner’s application for pre-ponement of date of hearing also stands rejected vide order of 8th July, 2014 while observing that due to heavy pendency, early hearing is not possible. Now the next date of hearing before the trial court is 27th January, 2015. CMM No.1069/2014 Page 1 Notice. Ms. Jyoti Jain, Advocate, accepts notice of petition on behalf of respondent-Union of India. Upon hearing and in the facts and circumstances of this case, it is directed that petitioner’s application be positively taken up for hearing on the date fixed and if it is not possible to dispose of the said application on the date fixed, then the said application must be disposed of by the trial court within six weeks from the next date fixed. With aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE DECEMBER05 2014 r CMM No.1069/2014 Page 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2014 Same Parties Sher Singh vs Union of India Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge Sunil Gaur