Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karamjit Kaur Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.354/2014 & I.A. Nos.2332/2014, 9547/2014 & 11477/2014 KARAMJIT KAUR Through .....Plaintiff Ms.Amita Gupta Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..Defendants Through Mr.Gautam Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction in respect of property bearing No.C-599 measuring 150 sq. yards forming part of Khasra No.23/1-2, situated within the revenue estate of Village Devli (now forming part of unauthorized colony C-Block, Sangam Vihar, Delhi) (hereinafter referred to as the suit property) against the defendants.2. When the suit was listed on the first date, the objection was raised by the defendant with regard to maintainability of the suit. In order to ensure that the suit is not infructuous, an assurance was given by the learned counsel for the defendants not to take precipitative action ...
Vinod Kumar Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~9 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5076/2014 VINOD KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashraf Hasnain, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Vijay Yadav, Sub Inspector Charan Singh and Sub Inspector Paramjit Singh, Spl. Staff. Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate with complainant in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 5067/2014 ABHISHEK AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Vijay Yadav, Sub Inspector Charan Singh and Sub Inspector Paramjit Singh, Spl. Staff. Mr. Ashraf Hasnain, Advocate with Sh. Sudhir Dhingra, Father / Attorney of the complainant Ms. Shivani Dhingra. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) These two matters have been filed under Section 482 ...
Rohit @ Ranjan and ors. Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5343/2014 ROHIT @ RANJAN & ORS. Through .... Petitioners Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocate with Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. R. K. Hooda, Advocate with complainant. Sub Inspector Sandeep Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.18200/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5343/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.10/2010, registered under Section 498-A, 406 IPC at police station Shalimar Bagh, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. R. K. Hooda, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. T...
Rajiv Gupta and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4499/2014 & 8959/2014 RAJIV GUPTA & ANR .... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Nitin Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Y.D. Nagar, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Ms Mrinalini Sen Gupta and Ms Mrinmoi Chatterjee, Advocates for R-3 Mr Siddharth Panda, Advocate for R-4 & R-5 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit filed by respondent No.5 was returned with the objection that the translation of the possession proceedings which were in Hindi had not been furnished. We waive that objection and take the counter affidavit on record.2. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred t...
Ashok Kumar Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4536/2014 & CM90352014 ASHOK KUMAR MEHTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda for Mr Yeeshu Jain for L&B. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under t...
Sparsh Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4622/2014 & CM91952014 SPARSH PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisitio...
Vineet Mehra Vs. Payal Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 24, 2014 + CM(M) 1042/2014 VINEET MEHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jaspreet S. Rai, Advocate versus PAYAL MEHRA ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL % C.M.No.19308/2014 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 1042/2014 A decree of divorce by mutual consent is sought by the parties before trial court. The grievance of petitioner is that even on the next date of hearing i.e. on 24th December, 2014, the hearing before trial court may be got deferred for one reason or the other and the marriage proposal of the petitioner would be adversely affected by it. In view of aforesaid, this petition is disposed of while making it C.M.(M) No.1042/2014 Page 1 clear that petitioners petition for divorce by mutual consent be promptly dealt with by trial court on the date already fixed. Dasti. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE NOVEMBER24 2014 r C.M.(M) No.1042/2014 Page 2...
Roshan Lal and ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5321/2014 ROSHAN LAL & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rohit, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State with WSI Saroj PS R.K. Puram. Mr. Faizal Naseem, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. ORDER2411.2014 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2010 registered under Sections 498A/406/494 IPC at Police Station R.K. Puram on 24th May, 2010 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Rekha are present in person and are identified by the Investigating Officer/ WSI Saroj, Police Station R.K. Puram.4. The aforesaid FIR is s...
Royal Sunderam Alliance Insurance Vs. Bhawna Aggarwal and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~R-23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 828/2006 ROYAL SUNDERAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus BHAWNA AGGARWAL & ORS ..... Respondents Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. In this matter none is appearing for the respondent/claimant. None has appeared on several hearings in the past. On 30.01.2009, 20.4.2009, 24.9.2013, 8.1.2014 and 29.1.2014 when the matter was listed none had appeared for respondents. Today also none has appeared.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition is that on 12.4.2004 the deceased was driving a car. When he reached Garh Mukteshwar, a tractor trolley coming from the opposite direction hit the car. The deceased succumbed to his injuries sustained. The claimants, namely, respondents No.1 to 5 filed a claim petition under section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act , 1988 seeking compensation from the owner of the car b...
Vir Bala Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4533/2014 & CM90302014 VIR BALA MEHTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda Mr Arjun Pant for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (h...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »