Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vineet Mehra Vs. Payal Mehra

Vineet Mehra vs Payal Mehra

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 24, 2014
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1172017

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vineet Mehra

Advocate Mr. Jaspreet S. Rai

Respondent

Payal Mehra

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision: november 24, 2014 + cm(m) 1042/2014 vineet mehra through: ..... petitioner mr. jaspreet s. rai, advocate versus payal mehra ..... respondent through: nemo. coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur judgment oral % c.m.no.19308/2014 allowed subject to all just exceptions. cm(m) 1042/2014 a decree of divorce by mutual consent is sought by the parties before trial court. the grievance of petitioner is that even on the next date of hearing i.e. on 24th december, 2014, the hearing before trial court may be got deferred for one reason or the other and the marriage proposal of the petitioner would be adversely affected by it. in view of aforesaid, this petition is disposed of while making it c.m.(m) no.1042/2014 page 1 clear that petitioner’s petition for divorce by mutual consent be promptly dealt with by trial court on the date already fixed. dasti. (sunil gaur) judge november24 2014 r c.m.(m) no.1042/2014 page 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 24, 2014 + CM(M) 1042/2014 VINEET MEHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jaspreet S. Rai, Advocate versus PAYAL MEHRA ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT

ORAL % C.M.No.19308/2014 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 1042/2014 A decree of divorce by mutual consent is sought by the parties before trial court. The grievance of petitioner is that even on the next date of hearing i.e. on 24th December, 2014, the hearing before trial court may be got deferred for one reason or the other and the marriage proposal of the petitioner would be adversely affected by it. In view of aforesaid, this petition is disposed of while making it C.M.(M) No.1042/2014 Page 1 clear that petitioner’s petition for divorce by mutual consent be promptly dealt with by trial court on the date already fixed. Dasti. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE NOVEMBER24 2014 r C.M.(M) No.1042/2014 Page 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial