Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laxmi Narayan @ Lambu Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 851 of 2010 LAXMI NARAYAN @ LAMBU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate along with Appellant in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. And CRL.A. 853 of 2010 DEVENDER @ RAMU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate along with Appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2411.2014 1. These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 19th May 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 (ASJ) (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.38/09 convicting the Appellants, Laxmi Narain @ Lambu and Devender @ Ramu, for the offences under Sections 452 read with 34 IPC and Sections 308/34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 21 st May 2010 whereby each of them was sentenced to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment (RI) for the offence under Section 452/34 IPC and thre...
Sunil Gupta Vs. Vijay Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:24. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 118/ 2011 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Adv. with Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: + Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. EX. P. 240/ 2013 HARJINDER PAL SINGH Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Rashmi Verma, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL IA No.5652/ 2014 (O. XXI Rules 59, 91 & 92 CPC) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011 IA No.6423/ 2014 (Objections) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011, and EA (OS) No.288/ 2014 (Objections) in Ex. P. 240/ 2013 1. The three applications in the above stated suit and Execution Petition are taken up for disposal together as a common question of law and fact is involved in all the three applications moved by the applicant/ objector.2. CS (OS) No.171/2010 titled Harjinder Pal Si...
Justice for All Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.4607 /2013 JUSTICE FOR ALL Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Khagesh K. Jha, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. D. Ray Chaudhary & Ms. Arpita, Advs. for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This appeal under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), flags the issue of allottees of land for the purpose of establishing a nursery school / play school / crches thereon, on the condition of admitting students belonging to weaker sections of the society to the extent of 25% and grant of freeship to them, after being put into possession of the said land not abiding by the said condition and the respondents Director of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) and Delhi Development Authority (DDA) not only not taking any action wit...
Rajan Nanda Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
Citigroup Inc. and anr. Vs. Citicorp Business and Finance Pvt. Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.1789/2013 CITIGROUP INC. AND ANR. Plaintiffs Through Mr. CM Lall, Adv. with Anuj Nair, Adv. versus CITICORP BUSINESS & FINANCE PVT. LTD. AND ANR .Defendants Through Mr. Zahid Ali, Adv. with Mr.A.K.De, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. By this order, this Court proposes to decide the following applications: (i) I.A. 14886/2013 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. (ii) I.A. 6545/2014 under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC. (iii) I.A. 19385/2014 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. (iv) I.A. No.14888/2013 under Section 149 CPC.2. The present suit for injunction and damages for infringement of registered trade mark, passing off and unfair trade competition has been filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants in respect trademarks CITI and CITICORP. Along with the suit, plaintiffs also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CP...
Harjinder Pal Singh Vs. Vijay Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:24. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 118/ 2011 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Adv. with Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: + Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. EX. P. 240/ 2013 HARJINDER PAL SINGH Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Rashmi Verma, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL IA No.5652/ 2014 (O. XXI Rules 59, 91 & 92 CPC) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011 IA No.6423/ 2014 (Objections) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011, and EA (OS) No.288/ 2014 (Objections) in Ex. P. 240/ 2013 1. The three applications in the above stated suit and Execution Petition are taken up for disposal together as a common question of law and fact is involved in all the three applications moved by the applicant/ objector.2. CS (OS) No.171/2010 titled Harjinder Pal Si...
Manish Dahiya and ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4533/2014 MANISH DAHIYA & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. J.K. Bhola, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Ms. Abha Singh, Advocate with complainant. Sub Inspector Brij Pal Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.15525/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.4533/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.216/2011, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC on 22.12.2011 at police station Prasad Nagar, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Ms. Abha Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.2/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The second respondent, Smt. Madhu, who is pr...
Arvinder Kapoor Vs. Ruchi Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 24, 2014 + CM(M) 972/2014 ARVINDER KAPOOR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate versus RUCHI KAPOOR ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL % C.M.No.17953/2014 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 972/2014 Divorce petition filed by petitioner is stated to be pending before the concerned family court since the year 2012. The prayer made in this petition is for expeditious disposal of the said petition, which is now listed for evidence on 15th July, 2015. At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioner had drawn attention of this Court to impugned order of 12 th September, 2014 (Annexure P-16) to point out that an adjournment of one year has been granted by the C.M.(M) No.972/2014 Page 1 concerned family court and if such long adjournments are granted, then it will take about five years more to get the said petition decided. Upon hearing and on perusa...
Dsj Communication Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.757/2014 & CMs No.19262/2014 (for stay), 19261/2014 (for condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal) & 19351/2014 (for condonation of 11 days delay in re-filing the appeal) DSJ COMMUNICATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao & Mr. Vikas Pathak, Advs. versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. Mr. Arun, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2411.2014 CM No.19263/2014 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. LPA No.757/2014 3. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 30th July, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.934/2010 preferred by the appellant. Though the appeal is accompanied with applications for condonation of 102 days delay in filing and 11 days delay in re-filing thereof and though we do not find any sufficient cause for con...
Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »