Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and anr. Vs. Balbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
$~R-30, 126 & 127 (Part-C) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h October, 2014 + (i) LA.APP. 152/2007 RAM KUMAR & ANR. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Inder Singh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms.K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Advocates for respondent-UOI + (ii) LA.APP. 201/2010 BALBIR SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. N.S. Chechi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: .....Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Advocates for respondent-UOI Ms. Sriti Bisoi, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3-DDA + (iii) LA.APP. 943/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms.K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Advocates for appellant-UOI versus LA.APPS. 152/07, 201/10 & 943/10 Page 1 BALBIR SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. N.S. Chechi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL With the consent of learned counse...
Smt. Rajbala Vs. Sh. Giri Lal @ Girwar Singh (Deceased) Through His
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.469/2014 & C.M.Nos.8181/2014 (Stay) & 8182/2014 (Exemption) 30th October, 2014 % SMT. RAJBALA Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Nitin Sheel, Advocate. VERSUS SH. GIRI LAL @ GIRWAR SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIR, SH. SANTPAL SINGH ...... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanyam Saxena, Advocate for R1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Challenge by means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order of the executing court dated 14.3.2014 by which the executing court allowed the application filed by the decree holder/respondent for setting aside the order dated 09.9.2011 by which the execution petition was dismissed in default.2. Before me counsel for the petitioner argues that delay in filing of an application under order XXI Rule 106 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) cannot be condoned in view of Section 5 of the Limitation ...
M/S. Khem Chand Ramesh Kumar Vs. Smt. Vijay Mehra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.Nos.347/2014, 342/2014 & 344/2014 30th October, 2014 % 1. RC. REV. No.347/2014 and C.M. Nos.17682/2014, 17684-86/2014 M/S. KHEM CHAND RAMESH KUMAR ......Petitioner Through: Dr. N.K. Khetarpal, Advocate. VERSUS SMT. VIJAY MEHRA AND ORS. Through:2. ...... Respondents Sh. S.N. Choudhri, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5. RC. REV. No.342/2014 and C.M. Nos.17403-06/2014 RADHEY SHYAM GOEL Through: ......Petitioner Dr. N.K. Khetarpal, Advocate. VERSUS SMT. VIJAY MEHRA AND ORS. Through:3. ...... Respondents Sh. S.N. Choudhri, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5. RC. REV. No.344/2014 and C.M. Nos.17468-71/2014 PRADEEP TRANSPORT COMPANY ......Petitioner Through: Dr. N.K. Khetarpal, Advocate. VERSUS SMT. VIJAY MEHRA AND ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Sh. S.N. Choudhri, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RC. REV. No.347/2014 and C.M. ...
Reserve Bank of India Vs. B.S. Rawat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30th October, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1286/2011 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H.S. Parihar and Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocates. Versus B.S. RAWAT ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the award dated 28.09.2010 passed by the learned tribunal in I.D. No.21/2004.2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent B.S. Rawat who was employed as a typist with the petitioner bank had failed to discharge his loan liabilities. The Societies wrote to the petitioner bank. Accordingly, recoveries as instalments towards loans were effected from his salary.3. However, on 14.06.2001 and 01.08.2001, letters were issued by which the respondent was called upon to submit a statement in respect of his debt liability. Accordingly, he submitted rep...
Ram Murat Vs. M/S. Dynatech Controls (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 8404/2010 RAM MURAT ..... Petitioner versus M/S. DYNATECH CONTROLS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sanjoy Ghose. For the Respondent : Mr Satender Verma. AND + W.P.(C) 3496/2011 M/S. DYNATECH CONTROLS (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner versus RAM MURAT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Satender Verma. For the Respondent : Mr Sanjoy Ghose. ..... Respondent CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions have been filed impugning an award dated 05.12.2009 passed by the Labour Court in DID No.407/06/05 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned award). By the impugned award, the Labour Court has awarded a compensation of `33,705/- to the workman (petitioner in W.P.(C) 8404/2010).2. While the workman is aggrieved by the impugned order inasmuch as, although the Labour Court has held that termination of the wor...
Tobir Ahmed Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 17, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: October 30, 2014 % + CRL.A. 777/2011 TOBIR AHMED Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Manoj Komal and SI Amrit Lal, PS Nabi Karim. CRL.A. 699/2011 MOHD.AZAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Manoj Komal and SI Amrit Lal, PS Nabi Karim. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Tobir Ahmed and Mohd. Azam are convicted for the offence punishable under Section 364A/34 IPC by the impugned judgment dated March 03, 2011 for kidnapping for ransom one Mohd. Bakhtawar Ali son of Mohd. Shabir PW-2 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `2000/...
Amitava Acharjee Vs. Kulwant Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
$~A-21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: October 30, 2014 MAC.APP. 715/2013 AMITAVA ACHARJEE Through versus KULWANT SINGH & ORS Through + ..... Appellant Mr.A.K.Mishra, Mr.Hemant , Mr.N.K.Beniwal and Mr.Ashok Mahipal, Advocates with appellant in person ..... Respondent Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for the Insurance Company MAC.APP. 781/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus MS ANURADHA ACHARJEE AND ORS..... Respondent Through Mr.A.K.Mishra, Mr.Hemant , Mr.N.K.Beniwal and Mr.Ashok Mahipal, Advocates alongwith Mr.Amitava Chatterjee in person + MAC.APP. 774/2013 AMITAVA ACHARJEE Through versus KULWANT SINGH & ORS Through + ..... Appellant Mr.A.K.Mishra, Mr.Hemant , Mr.N.K.Beniwal and Mr.Ashok Mahipal, Advocates alongwith appellant in person ..... Respondent Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for the Insurance Company MAC.APP. 778/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through + + + Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate ver...
Ritu Gupta and anr Vs. Usha Dhand and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 188/2011 % Judgment dated 30.10.2014 RITU GUPTA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vijayender Kumar and Ms. Rhea Mitra, Advs. versus USHA DHAND & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Hashmat Nabi, Adv. for D-4 Mr.Suresh Arora, Adv. for D-5 Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Adv. for D-7 Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. for D-8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A.10405/2011 (under Section 151 CPC), I.A.12761/2011 (under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC filed by plaintiffs against defendant No.8), I.A.12763/2011 (under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC filed by plaintiffs against defendants No.4 &5) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. Plaintiffs claim themselves to be the owners and are in absolute possession of property bearing No.J-2/9, Krishna Nagar, New Delhi-110059, measuring 114 sq. yds., comprising of ground floor, first floor and terrace. The plaintiffs a...
Tr Kuriakose Vs. Biji Kuriakose
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h October, 2014 + CM(M) 1511/2010 TR KURIAKOSE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocate versus BIJI KURIAKOSE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Abini Mathew, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR SUNIL GAUR, J.(ORAL) C.M.APPL.13334/2014 (for restoration) CM(M) No.1511/2010 was dismissed in default on 24th July, 2014. By way of this application, restoration of main petition is sought. A bare perusal of the aforesaid order reveals that none was present on behalf of the parties on that day. Learned counsel for petitioner/applicant has placed on record copy of cause-list of 24th July, 2014 in support of the averments made in paragraph No.2 of the instant application. The averments made in paragraph No.2 of the instant application are duly supported by the copy of the cause-list placed on record today. CM(M) 1511/2010 Page 1 The application is allowed and main petition ...
Mr L K Kaul Thr Lrs Vs. Shri Pradeep Kumar Khanna (Huf) and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 212/2014 MR L K KAUL THR LRS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rattan K. Singh, Mr. Rajneesh Kumar, Mr. Akshay Malhotra, Mr. Shashi Bhushan, Mr. Suraj Prakash, Ms. Anjali, Advocates. versus SHRI PRADEEP KUMAR KHANNA (HUF) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr. Yakesh Anand, Ms. Sonam Anand, Mrs. Kajal Chandra, Mr.Subham Tripathi, Advocates for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER3010.2014 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. The challenge in this first appeal is to the order dated 5th September 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby I.A. No.8587/2011, seeking condonation of delay of 548 days in filing the application for restoration of the suit has been dismissed.2. Addressing arguments on behalf of the appellant, Mr.Rattan K. Singh, Advocate, vehemently contends that the learned Single Judge did not appreciate that Mr. L.K. Kaul, who was the plaintiff in the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »