Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 41 of about 723 results (0.024 seconds)New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kusum Lata and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. h January, 2014 + MAC. APP. No.1243/2012 & CM No.20446/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Abhishek Kumar and Mr.Vijay Singh, Advocates. Versus KUSUM LATA & ORS. Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ..... Respondents SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC. APP. No.1243/2012 1. Despite service, none appeared on behalf of the respondents, therefore, this Court has no option but to proceed with the matter.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/Insurance Company has assailed the impugned award dated 19.10.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.6,34,584/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum in favour of the respondents/claimants from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization.3. The present appeal has been filed solely on the ground that while granting compensation noted above, the learned Tribunal has gra...
Tag this Judgment!icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kanta Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. h January, 2014 + MAC.APP. 268/2013 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. versus KANTA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv. for R1 and R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant appeal, the appellant has assailed the award dated 17.12.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.6,01,600/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till its realization.2. Present appal has been filed mainly on the ground that there were two dependents, i.e., parents, however, ld. Tribunal has deducted 1/3rd instead of towards personal expenses.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that sister cannot be considered as dependents, therefore, there were only two dependents and ld. Tribunal ought to have deducted of the income of the d...
Tag this Judgment!Arvind Kejriwal and ors Vs. Amit Sibal and anr
Court: Delhi
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5245/2013 and Crl.M.A.Nos.18920-21/2013 Date of Decision :16. h January, 2014 % ARVIND KEJRIWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Mr. Rohit Singh, Mr. Kartik Seth,Mr. Rishikesh Verma and Ms. Neha Rastogi, Advs. versus AMIT SIBAL & ANR Through : ..... Respondents Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Madhav Tripathi and Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advs. for R-1. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Respondent no.1 instituted a complaint of defamation against the petitioners under Sections 500 and 501 read with Sections 34 and 120B of IPC in which, vide summoning order dated 24th July, 2013, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate issued summons to the petitioners.2. The petitioners have challenged the summoning order dated 24th July, 2013 on the ground that respondent no.1 is not the aggrieved person within the meaning of Section 199(1) Cr.P.C. The petitioners are also seeking...
Tag this Judgment!Gulshan Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :9. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 397/2003 GULSHAN SHARMA & ORS. ....Appellants Through : Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Mr.B.Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Gulshan Sharma (A-1), Harish Sharma (A-2) and Kamni Sharma (A-3) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 03.03.2003 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.41/00 arising out of FIR No.543/00 PS Rajouri Garden whereby they were convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 05.03.2003, they were awarded RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/-, each. The prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet is as follows :2. On 01.06.2000, Rajeev Taneja had gone at the residence of the accused persons to demand payment which A-1 had failed to pay being member of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Maharaja Kumar Kharagh Singh of Nabha (Deceased) T Vs. His Highness Ma ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h January, 2014 % + RFA No.44/2009 MAHARAJA KUMAR KHARAGH SINGH OF NABHA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vivek Chaudhary & Mr. Pankaj Bhatia, Advs. Versus HIS HIGHNESS MAHARAJA PRATAP SINGH OF NABHA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manoj Sharma, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Akhil Sachhar & Ms. Deepali Sharma, Advs. for R-4 & R-6. Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Adv. for R-5. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the decree dated 19.08.2008 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Fast Track Court, Delhi of dismissal of suit No.293/2006 [old suit No.75/1975]. filed by the appellant consequent to the rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record requisitioned. The appellant demonstrated a highly lackadais...
Tag this Judgment!Swatanter Kumar Vs. the Indian Express Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order Pronounced on: January 16, 2014 I.A. No.723/2014 in CS(OS) No.102/2014 SWATANTER KUMAR Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Adv., Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Adv., Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv., Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr.Adv., Mr.Vinay Bhasin, Sr.Adv., Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv., Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv., Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv., Mr.Aman Lekhi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sudhir Walia, Mr.Ralan Karanjawala, Ms.Fareha Ahmad Khan, Mr.Abhijat, Mr.Mohit Mathur, Mr.P.Banerjee, Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Meghna Mishra, Mr.Akshay Makhija, Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Mr.Abhimanya Mahajan, Ms.Mansi Sharma, Ms.Nidhi Parashar, Ms.Niyati Kohli & Mr.Varun Kumar Tikmani, Advs. versus THE INDIAN EXPRESS LTD. & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Ashwani Mata, Sr.Adv. & Mr.Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Sondhi, Mr.Kunal Tandon, Mr.Kapil Arora & Ms.Nidhi, Advs. for D-3. Dr.Saif Mahmood, Adv. for D-4. Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Sachin Datta, CGSC & Mr.Vineet Tayal, Adv. for ...
Tag this Judgment!Kanan Mandal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:16.01.2014. CRL.A. 1283/2013 & Crl.M (Bail) No.2041/2013 KANAN MANDAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Hussain, APP along with SI Giriraj. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The appellant Kannan Mandal aged 56 years has been convicted under Section 366 of the IPC as also sections 4, 5 & 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (in short ITP Act) vide judgment dated 27.08.2013 and vide order of sentence of the same day i.e. 27.08.2013 the appellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 4 years and 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 30 days for the offence under Section 366 of the IPC; for the offence under Section 4 of ITP Act, she has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine,...
Tag this Judgment!icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lokender Signh and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. h January, 2014 + MAC.APP. 270/2013 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. versus LOKENDER SIGNH & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant appeal, the appellant has assailed the award dated 17.12.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.76,025/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till its realization.2. Present appal has been filed mainly on the ground that the vehicle was plying without a valid permit and in that eventuality, appellant is not liable to pay any compensation amount as directed by the ld. Tribunal.3. Admittedly, recovery rights have not been granted.4. As the issue of valid permit is concerned, the appellant / insurance company has not taken any steps to serve respondent nos. 2 & 3, i.e., driver and ...
Tag this Judgment!Shipra Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Jai Pal Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. h January, 2014 + MAC.APP. 397/2010 SHIPRA CHATTERJEE & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr. Rajeev Khosla, Advocate. Versus JAI PAL SINGH AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal has been filed by the claimants for enhancing the impugned award dated 19.12.2009, whereby ld. Tribunal granted compensation for an amount of Rs.4,66,630/- with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till its realization.2. It is noted that while computing the compensation amount noted above, inadvertently, the learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.4,66,630/instead of Rs.4,66,300/-.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that undisputedly the deceased met with an accident on 01.03.1997 and remained in COMA till his death, i.e., 18.12.1997. He died at the age of 37 years; left beh...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Jagwanti Vs. Bhoop Singh
Court: Delhi
$~R4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16. h January, 2014 + MAC.APP. 888-89/2005 SMT. JAGWANTI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. Versus BHOOP SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Gaur, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 01.09.2005, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.3,90,000/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount noted above.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that on the date of accident, the deceased was 22 years of age. He was a bachelor and left behind parents. He was working with Net Based Solutions, Rohtak Road, Delhi and was earning Rs.4,000/- per month from his employer, which is proved by the salary certificate Ex....
Tag this Judgment!