Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 38 of about 723 results (0.019 seconds)Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Smt Mithilesh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. h January, 2014 + MAC. APP. No.985 /2013 & CM Nos.17248/2012 & 854/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus SMT MITHILESH AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Kamal Deep, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 985/2013 1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/Insurance Company impugns the award dated 06.08.2013, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.21,58,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of DAR till realization of the amount.2. The only ground taken in the instant appeal is that the appellant/Insurance Company made a legal offer for an amount of Rs.9,94,104/-, but the same was not accepted by the LRs of the deceased.3. Vide order dated 27.09.2012, the learned Tribunal has framed the following issues:I. What amoun...
Tag this Judgment!Mk Mahajan and anr. Vs. Indo Rollhard Indust. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h November, 2013 Date of Decision:17th January, 2014 % + CO.PET. 136/2005 WITH CO. APPL. Nos.898/2013 & 21592160/2013. MK MAHAJAN & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate. versus INDO ROLLHARD INDUST. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sarat Chandra with Mr. Manoj Kumar Garg and Mr. Sachin Chandra, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: CO. APPL. Nos.2159-2160/2013 1. One M K Mahajan and another person filed CP No.136 of 2005 seeking winding up of the respondent-company. On 16.2.2009 the learned Company Judge passed an elaborate order. Paragraphs 45 and 46 of the said order are as follows :45. In view of the law discussed above and by carefully analysing the facts and records relied upon by both counsels, I am of the considered view that it is just and equitable to wind up the Company and allow this petition, under Sections 433(e), Section 433(f) & 433(c) read with Sec...
Tag this Judgment!Dtc and anr. Vs. Tara Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:17. h January, 2014 + MAC.A.487/2006 & CM No.7800/2006 DTC AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr. J.N. Aggarwal, Advocate. Versus JAI CHAND ..... Respondent Represented by: None. AND MAC.A.205/2009 & CM No.5833/2009 DTC AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr. J.N. Aggarwal, Advocate. Versus TARA CHAND ..... Respondent Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the aforenoted appeal bearing MAC. APP. No.487/2006, the appellant/Corporation has MACA Nos.487/2006 & 205/2009 assailed the impugned award 05.04.2006, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.15,27,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide appeal appellant/Corporation bearing has MAC. assailed the APP. No.205/2009, impugned award the dated 27.07.2008, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted comp...
Tag this Judgment!Gkc Projects Ltd Vs. Unitech Machines Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19. 12.2013 Decided on :17. 01.2014 + IA No.12367/2013 (u/O39R1& 2 CPC) in CS(OS) 1535/2013 ..... Plaintiff GKC PROJECTS LTD Through Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate versus UNITECH MACHINES LTD Through ..... Defendant Ms. Geeta Rani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.12367/2013 (u/O39R1&2) 1. The present application is filed by the plaintiff seeking ex parte injunction to restrain the defendant from pursuing in any manner or taking steps to pursue the arbitration initiated by the defendant before Justice J.D Kapoor (Retd.), Sole Arbitrator.2. The accompanying suit is filed seeking a declaration that the Arbitration Agreement under the Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant has ceased to exist and is inoperative and that the appointment of the sole arbitrator under the Contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is non-est, null and void. Other connected reliefs are also sought.3. The defen...
Tag this Judgment!Janak Datwani Vs. C.N.a Exports Pvt Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 20.09.2013 Judgment Pronounced on:17.01.2014 + IA No.3265/2013 (u/O6R17CPC) in CS(OS) 244/2013 JANAK DATWANI Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Amit Sibal and Mr.Ayush Agrawal, Advocate versus C.N.A EXPORTS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi and Mr.Suresh Singh, Advocate for D-1 and 2. Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Advocate for D-4. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for ROC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.3265/2013 (u/O6R17CPC) 1. This is an application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the Plaint. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying plaint seeking relief of declaration for declaring all the acts and deeds done by or on behalf of defendants No.1 and 2 to transfer or to facilitate the transfer of the shares of Mrs.Sushma Ravi Das to defendant No.2 including Gift Deed dated 12.1.1998, Transfer Deed dated 23.3.1998 and other acts done by defendants No.1 and 2 as illegal, n...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Lalkuan Stone Crushers Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.1972/2006 Judgment Reserved on : December 10, 2013 % Judgment Pronounced on : January 17, 2014 M/S. LALKUAN STONE CRUSHERS LTD. ...APPELLANT Through : Mr. J.C. Seth, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Through : RESPONDENTS Mr. S.K. Dubey, Advocate for R1/UOI. None for R2/ State of Uttaranchal. Mr. Vinay Garg, Advocate for R3/SIDCUL. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT N.V. RAMANA, CHIEF JUSTICE:1. The appellant, who was unsuccessful before the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (Civil) No.9460/2006, has filed the present appeal thereby assailing the impugned judgment dated 24.08.2006 on the ground that respondent No.3 herein / State Industrial Development Corporation of Uttaranchal Ltd. (for short, SIDCUL) had no jurisdiction to scrutinize the claims of the appellant for Rs.2,24,57,589/- towards transport subsidy for the period October, 1993 to June, 1996 in respect of its unit at Haldwani...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Nagender Shah
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. No.230 of 2013 STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Charu Dalal for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State with IO/ASI Charan Dass from PS: Mandir Marg. versus NAGENDER SHAH ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1701.2014 CRL.M.A.No.5530 of 2013 (for condonation of delay in filing the petition) 1. There is a delay of around 37 days in filing the present application for leave to appeal.2. The Court finds that the explanation offered in this application is satisfactory. Accordingly, the delay in filing the leave petition is condoned.3. The application is allowed. CRL.L.P. No.230 of 2013 4. This is a petition under Section 378 (1) CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 18th December 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) acquitting the Respondent of the offences under Sections 377/365/506 IPC in the case arising out of FIR No.135 of 2011.5. The case of the prosecution is that on 12th July 2011, info...
Tag this Judgment!Crayons Advertising Ltd Vs. Crayon Advertising
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IA No.11898/2013 in CS(OS) 1489/2013 Judgment Reserved on :10.09.2013 Judgment Pronounced on:17. 01.2014 CRAYONS ADVERTISING LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms.Roopa Dayal, Mr. Saeed Hussain and Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocate versus CRAYON ADVERTISING Through ..... Defendant Mrs. Anuradha Salhotra, Ms.Aakanksha Sekhon and Mr. Diwakar S. Pundir, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.11898/2013 (u/O39R1& 2 CPC) 1. This is an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking ex parte interim injunction to restrain the defendant from using the domain name www.crayonadv.com or any other name which is similar to the plaintiffs domain name www.crayonad.com.2. Plaintiff has filed the accompanying Suit seeking a decree of permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendant from using the name Crayon Advertising or the domain name www.crayonadv.com and other reliefs. The plaintiff has in the accompanyin...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
$~R-11, R-12 & R-13 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:09.10.2014 Judgment Delivered on:17.01.2014 CRL.A.31/2006 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Puneet Singhal, Adv. along with accused in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Fizani Hussain, APP along with SI Amarjeet. CRL.A.575/2006 SUNIL KUMAR @ PEHALWAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Puneet Singhal, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Fizani Hussain, APP along with SI Amarjeet. CRL.A.905/2006 SUNIL @ SOMI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Puneet Singhal, Adv. along with accused in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Fizani Hussain, APP along with SI Amarjeet. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 On 19.11.2001 at about 11.00 a.m. in house No.C-174, Sector-1, Avantika, of the complainant Kamla Devi (PW-1), the appellants/accused had while committing robbery had also caused injuries upon her person. 2 There were four persons involved in t...
Tag this Judgment!Abbot India Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h January, 2014. % + RFA2072013, CM No.6908/2013 (for condonation of 285 days delay in filing the appeal) & CM No.6907/2013 (for stay). ABBOT INDIA LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Mr. Nakul Sachedev & Ms. Saloni Chowdhry, Advs. Versus RAJINDER MOHINDRA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shankar Vaidialingum, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 21 st April, 2012 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ) (Central)-12, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS No.39/2004 (Unique Case ID No.02401C60492004) filed by the two respondents/plaintiffs against the appellant/defendant) on admissions of ejectment of the appellant/defendant, after determination of tenancy, from property No.E-44/10, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi-110020.2. The appeal is accompanied with an applica...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »