Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Satish @ Sonu Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
$-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :15. h JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 878/2012 SATISH @ SONU ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOT. OF NCT) DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Satish @ Sonu (the appellant) impugns the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 10.10.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.43/2011 arising out of FIR No.202/2008 PS Subzi Mandi by which he was convicted for committing offence under Section 394 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for four years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 31.07.2008 at about 03.00 04.00 P.M. after dropping a passenger complainant Nurain Baitha, an auto driver, came out from Mahindra Park with TSR No.DL-1RE-0511 and the appellant boarded the TSR to go to Hindu Rao Hospital. On the way, the appellant got stopped the TSR and when the complainant ...
Tag this Judgment!Royal Airways Ltd. and ors. Vs. Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 18, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: January 15, 2014 (i) + CRL.M.C. 1089/2012 SATISH KUMAR MODI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nisha Rohtagi, Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Rishi Aggarwala, Ms. Nisha Rohtagi , Mr. Vinod Gupta & Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocates versus STATE Through: (ii) + .....Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State CRL.M.C. 1090/2012 SATISH KUMAR MODI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Chaitali Jain, Ms Gousia Shah & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocates versus STATE Through: (iii) + .....Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State with SI Rajneesh CRL.M.C. 1132/2012 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 3978 & 80/2012 ROYAL AIRWAYS LTD & ORS. Crl. M.C. No.1089/2012 Crl. M.C. No.1090/2012 Crl. M.C. No.1132/2012 Crl. M.C. No.1760/2012 Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Sethi, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr....
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Asian Institute of Transport Development Vs. South Delhi Municipa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 186/2014 & CM No.333/2014 M/S. ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT ..... Petitioner Through Mr. B. B. Jain, Advocate. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Respondent Through Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved of an Assessment Order dated 23rd December, 2013, whereby vacant land tax to the tune of Rs.31,45,440/- has been raised against the petitioner, who has been directed to deposit the same within 15 days, failing which the petitioner will be obliged to pay interest @ 1% per month till the same is realized, besides the likelihood of coercive action being taken against the petitioner for realisation of the said demand.2. Issue notice to the respondent to show cause as to why Rule nisi be not issued.3. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate, accepts notice and submits that it is also open to the petitioner to approach the...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Rajinder Kaur and ors. Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. 11.2013 Pronounced on:15. 01.2014 + LPA No.403/2010 & C.M. No.10850/2010 (Stay) DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .Appellant Versus Respondents SMT. ANUVERSHA & Ors. + W.P. (C) No.614/2010 SMT. RAJINDER KAUR & ORS. .. Petitioner Versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .. Respondent Through: Mr. DSouza Philip, Standing Counsel with Mr. Sunil Satyarth, Advocates for the appellant. Ms. Anu Bagai, Advocate for respondents and petitioners in WP(C) No.614/2010. Mr. R.N. Singh with Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocates, for applicant in CM No.15841/2013. Mr. Nitendra Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent in LPA No.403/10 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI LPA No.403/2010 & WP(C) No.614/2010 Page 1 MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The Letters Patent Appeal No.403/2010 and the W.P.(C) 614/2010 are disposed off in terms of the separate judgment passed today in LPA No.434/2009. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) NAJMI WAZIRI (JUDGE) January 15, 201...
Tag this Judgment!Satish Kumar Modi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 18, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: January 15, 2014 (i) + CRL.M.C. 1089/2012 SATISH KUMAR MODI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nisha Rohtagi, Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Rishi Aggarwala, Ms. Nisha Rohtagi , Mr. Vinod Gupta & Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocates versus STATE Through: (ii) + .....Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State CRL.M.C. 1090/2012 SATISH KUMAR MODI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Chaitali Jain, Ms Gousia Shah & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocates versus STATE Through: (iii) + .....Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State with SI Rajneesh CRL.M.C. 1132/2012 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 3978 & 80/2012 ROYAL AIRWAYS LTD & ORS. Crl. M.C. No.1089/2012 Crl. M.C. No.1090/2012 Crl. M.C. No.1132/2012 Crl. M.C. No.1760/2012 Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Sethi, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Kavita Dogra Vs. Director of Enforcement, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-11 + CRL.A. 44 of 2008 KAVITA DOGRA Through: .....Appellant Mr. Kaanan Kapur, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vineet Malhotra with Ms. Manmeet Sethi, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER1501.2014 1. This appeal by the Appellant, Ms. Kavita Dogra, is directed against the impugned order dated 9th October 2007 of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (AT) dismissing Order-in-Appeal No.54 of 2004 against the adjudication order (Original) dated 28th October 2003 passed by the Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi alleging contravention, during the period 1994-95, of Section 18 (2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) for non-realization of export proceeds by M/s. Kwality Jewellers (India) Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to the company) of which the Appellant was a Director till 31st May 1995.2. The Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) initia...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Smt. Anuversha and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. 11.2013 Pronounced on:15. 01.2014 + LPA No.403/2010 & C.M. No.10850/2010 (Stay) DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .Appellant Versus Respondents SMT. ANUVERSHA & Ors. + W.P. (C) No.614/2010 SMT. RAJINDER KAUR & ORS. .. Petitioner Versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .. Respondent Through: Mr. DSouza Philip, Standing Counsel with Mr. Sunil Satyarth, Advocates for the appellant. Ms. Anu Bagai, Advocate for respondents and petitioners in WP(C) No.614/2010. Mr. R.N. Singh with Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocates, for applicant in CM No.15841/2013. Mr. Nitendra Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent in LPA No.403/10 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI LPA No.403/2010 & WP(C) No.614/2010 Page 1 MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The Letters Patent Appeal No.403/2010 and the W.P.(C) 614/2010 are disposed off in terms of the separate judgment passed today in LPA No.434/2009. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) NAJMI WAZIRI (JUDGE) January 15, 201...
Tag this Judgment!Gangadhar Padhy Vs. Prem Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h January, 2014. + RFA2692013 GANGADHAR PADHY Through: ..... Appellant Counsel for the appellant (appearance not given) Versus PREM SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Counsel for the respondent (appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 28 th January, 2013 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-I, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi of dismissal of Suit No.675/2010 (ID No.2403C031222010) filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.5 lakhs from the respondent/defendant towards damages suffered by the appellant/plaintiff due to malicious prosecution and defamation of the appellant/plaintiff at the instance of the respondent/defendant.2. Notice of the appeal and the application for condonation of 18 days delay in re-filing the same was issued. The counsel for the respondent/defendant appeared before this Court on 2...
Tag this Judgment!P.C. Mishra Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:08. 01.2014 Date of Decision:15. 01.2014 + P.C. MISHRA Crl.M(B) No.2126/2013 in Crl. Appeal No.692/2010 ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person versus CBI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, SPP with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advs. for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Crl.M(B) No.2126/2013 The appellant/ applicant before this Court was convicted under Section 7 & 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and was sentenced to undergo RI for two (2) years each on each count and was also sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each or to undergo SI for two (2) months each in default. The sentence awarded to the appellant has been suspended vide order dated 23.9.2010. Now this application has been filed by him seeking suspension of the conviction, primarily on the ground that the after retiring from service on 30.6.2010, he has no...
Tag this Judgment!Cap. Vijay Kumar Trehan Vs. Dr. Sushil Kumar Trehan and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 12.2013 Pronounced on:15. 01.2014 + RFA (OS) 14/2013 CAP. VIJAY KUMAR TREHAN .Appellant Through: Sh. Anil Amrit with Mr. Anurag Abhishek, Advocates Versus DR.SUSHIL KUMAR TREHAN AND ANR. Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi with Mr. Hemant Malhotra and Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advocates Ms. Eshita Baruah, for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This is an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge in CS(OS) No.901/2010, concerning the parties shares and related rights to a property bearing number B-2, Defence Colony, New Delhi (hereafter the suit property).2. The facts leading to this dispute are as follows: the appellant was the plaintiff in the suit.The first two defendants were his brothers, and the third and fourth defendants, his sisters. It is undisputed that the suit property was owned by Dr. Cap...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »