Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 34 of about 723 results (0.023 seconds)Rakesh Kumar and anr Vs. Saroj Marwah and anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :25.10.2013 Decided on :24. 01.2014 IA No.1275/2013 in CS(OS) 1727/2012 ... Plaintiffs RAKESH KUMAR & ANR Through Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bharat Gupta, Advocate versus SAROJ MARWAH & ANR Through ... Defendants Mr. Mr. S. Suri with Ms. Gunjan Kumar and Mr. Ankit Khurana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.1275/2013(u/O7 11 CPC) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of declaration and mandatory injunction. The plaintiff is stated to have purchased the suit property from defendant No.1 vide sale deed dated 19.05.2009. The property in question is half undivided share in property bearing No.51/4-B, Desh Bandhu Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, Delhi-110005 admeasuring 576.53. square yards. It is urged that symbolic possession was handed over to the plaintiff at the time of sale inasmuch as defendant No.2 Bank was a tenant in the suit property running its currency chest ...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ram Prakash and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.449/2013 and CM Nos. 18555-18556/2013 20th January, 2014 % NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ......Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. VERSUS RAM PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is filed by the Insurance Company against the impugned judgment of the Commissioner, Employees Compensation dated 22.8.2013 by which compensation has been awarded to the respondent No.1 herein, and who was the applicant before the Commissioner.2. The facts as found as per the judgment of the Commissioner in the present case shows that the vehicle in question bearing No.UP32-K- 9310 was insured with the appellant in the relevant period when the accident took place on 24.1.2011. The period of insurance admittedly is from 27.9.2010 to 26.9.2011. The vehicle was insured in ...
Tag this Judgment!Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private School Vs. Lt. Governor an ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h January, 2014. + LPA302014 ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.D. Gupta, Mr. Kamal Gupta, Ms. Diya Kapur, Ms. Shyel Trehan, Ms. Manjira Dasgupta, Vedanta Varma & Mr. Vibhor Kush and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocates. Versus LT. GOVERNOR & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Zubeda Begum, Vivek Kumar Tandon, Ms. Sana Ansari & Ms. Vanessa Singh, Advs. for R-1&2. Mr. Himanshu Bajaj and Ms. Saakshi Agrawal, Advocates for R-3/UOI. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Mr. Khagesh B. Jha and Ms. Arushi Agarwal, Advocates for R-4. AND + LPA312014 FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vedanta Varma, Adv. Versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Zubeda Begum, Vivek Kumar Tandon, Ms. Sana Ansari & Ms. Vanessa Sin...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Kumar Vs. the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Judgment reserved on:10. 01.2014 Date of Decision:20. 01.2014 CRL.A. 540/2013 RAMESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 571/2013 SUNIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 572/2013 SAHIB ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 574/2013 RAJ RANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus + + THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 576/2013 RAVINDER @ KUKU ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs....
Tag this Judgment!Manju Vs. the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Judgment reserved on:10. 01.2014 Date of Decision:20. 01.2014 CRL.A. 540/2013 RAMESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 571/2013 SUNIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 572/2013 SAHIB ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 574/2013 RAJ RANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus + + THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 576/2013 RAVINDER @ KUKU ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs....
Tag this Judgment!Sahib Vs. the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Judgment reserved on:10. 01.2014 Date of Decision:20. 01.2014 CRL.A. 540/2013 RAMESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 571/2013 SUNIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 572/2013 SAHIB ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 574/2013 RAJ RANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus + + THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 576/2013 RAVINDER @ KUKU ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs....
Tag this Judgment!Escorts Ltd. Vs. Singh Motors and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:20. 01.2014 + CRL.A. 1009/2013 ESCORTS LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.M. Bagai and Ms Damini Khaira, Advs. versus SINGH MOTORS & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Pramod Sharma, Adv for R-1 and 2, Mr Sanjay Gupta, Adv for R-3 JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) This appeal is directed against the order dated 01.03.211, whereby the complaint was dismissed for non-prosecution. A perusal of the record would show that on 27.05.2009, the learned counsel for the complainant was present, but no one was present for the respondent/accused. In fact, the respondents/accused persons never appeared before the Trial Court at any point of time. The counsel appearing for the respondents submits that they had no occasion to appear since the Court summon was not served upon the accused persons/respondents. When the matter was received in the Transferee Court, notice was issued to the complainant. For two dates, the notice could not be served. The ...
Tag this Judgment!Ravinder @ Kuku Vs. the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + Judgment reserved on:10. 01.2014 Date of Decision:20. 01.2014 CRL.A. 540/2013 RAMESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 571/2013 SUNIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 572/2013 SAHIB ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 574/2013 RAJ RANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs. versus + + THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. CRL.A. 576/2013 RAVINDER @ KUKU ..... Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Malik and Mr Sahil Malik, Advs....
Tag this Judgment!Chandra Vir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 13, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: January 20,2014 + W.P.(C) 3008/2001 CHANDRA VIR SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present petition challenges the order dated May 10, 1999 passed by the disciplinary authority, Group Commandant, CISF Navi Mumbai, dismissing petitioner from service as also the appellate order dated October 27, 1999 passed by the appellate authority, DIG Western Zone, Mumbai, rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner. We note that the petitioner has preferred a revision petition which was dismissed vide order dated November 14, 2000, by the revisional authority, which order has not been challenged.2. The factual matrix leading to the filing of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Nawab Singh Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on 16.01.2014 Date of Decision:20. 01.2014 + Crl. Appeal No.655/2010 NAWAB SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.B. Andley, senior advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) A complaint to the Director (Vigilance) of Delhi Government was made by Sangeeta Uttam, daughter of Suresh Uttam, alleging therein that her father applied to the SDM, Kalkaji, in the year 2002, for issue of a caste certificate, vide diary No.768/2002. She further alleged that the Enquiry Officer Nawab Singh verified her application and the documents annexed thereto with the original documents and found the same to be in order. He also made them bring the ration cards of two neighbours, noted their names on a paper and then demanded a sum of Rs 500/- as bribe for writing a report. They did not have Rs 500/- with them, but Nawab Singh t...
Tag this Judgment!