Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 26 of about 723 results (0.021 seconds)National Technical Research Organization Vs. P. Kulshrestha and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.385/2014 & CM Nos.765, 766 & 767/2014 Date of Decision:23. d January, 2014 NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION ...... Petitioner Through Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Adv. versus P. KULSHRESTHA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) No.407/2014 & CM Nos.801, 802 & 803 /2014 NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION ...... Petitioner Through Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Adv. versus MS MAHUA BANERJEE Through ..... Respondent Mr.M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) CM Nos.766-767/2014 in WP (C) Nos.385/2014 & CM Nos.802803/2014 in WP (C) No.407/2014 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.385/2014 & CM No.765/2014 WP (C) No.407/2014 & CM No.801/2014 2. The respondents in this case are scientists who are working with the National Technical Research Organization as Scientists and claiming that they were beneficiaries of the Flexible C...
Tag this Judgment!National Technical Research Organization Vs. Ms Mahua Banerjee
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.385/2014 & CM Nos.765, 766 & 767/2014 Date of Decision:23. d January, 2014 NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION ...... Petitioner Through Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Adv. versus P. KULSHRESTHA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) No.407/2014 & CM Nos.801, 802 & 803 /2014 NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION ...... Petitioner Through Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Adv. versus MS MAHUA BANERJEE Through ..... Respondent Mr.M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) CM Nos.766-767/2014 in WP (C) Nos.385/2014 & CM Nos.802803/2014 in WP (C) No.407/2014 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.385/2014 & CM No.765/2014 WP (C) No.407/2014 & CM No.801/2014 2. The respondents in this case are scientists who are working with the National Technical Research Organization as Scientists and claiming that they were beneficiaries of the Flexible C...
Tag this Judgment!Madhu Sharma and Others Vs. State Council of Educational Research and ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A): 1. Following relief has been sought in this O.A.:- (a) To fix the pay of the petitioners in the pay scale of Rs.6500-200-10500 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and pay all arrears accrued on such fixation along with interest @ 12% per annum computable from 01.01.1996 till the date of payment of arrears. (b) To fix the pay of the applicants in accordance with the recommendations of 6th Pay Commission with effect from 01.01.2006 taking into account the basic pay of the applicant on 01.01.2006 what so ever arrived on the basis of their re-fixation of their pay in the pay scale of Rs.6500-200-10500. (c) Quash and set aside the order dated 06.04.20111 (Annexure-A2) whereby the order dated 14.01.2009 (Annexure-A2a) is kept in abeyance. Award the cost for the present application. 2. The applicants of this O.A. are Librarians working under the State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) under the Government of NCT of Delhi. Their grievance is that they have not bee...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kapur Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 20.01.2014 Date of Decision:22. 01.2014 % + CRL. A. No.329 of 2010 SHALENDER KAUSHIK Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.330 of 2010 BRIJINDER MAKKAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.331 of 2010 S.P. KALIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.332 of 2010 MANOJ KAPUR ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. Through: versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/...
Tag this Judgment!Swapna Bhattacharya Vs. M/S M-tech Developers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 01.2014 CO.PET.54/2013 & CA No.141-142/2013 SWAPNA BHATTACHARYA ..... Petitioner versus M/S M-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B.K. Dash & Mr Pawan Kumar. For the Respondent : Mr Raman Duggal. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 433(e), (f), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, inter alia, praying for winding up of the respondent company. It is alleged that the respondent company has failed and neglected to pay the amounts due and payable to the petitioner and is, thus, unable to pay its debts. Consequently, it is contended that the respondent company is liable to be wound up.2. The respondent company is a company engaged in the business of developing real estate and housing projects. The respondent company is presently engaged in developing and construction...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Store One Retail India Ltd. (Formerly Known a Vs. M/S. Ttk Presti ...
Court: Delhi
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 22, 2014 + RFA(OS) 24/2014 M/S. STORE ONE RETAIL INDIA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA BULLS RETAIL SERVICES LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Arnav Kumar and Mr.Karan Luthra, Advocate versus M/S. TTK PRESTIGE LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.1322-23/2014 Allowed subject to just exceptions. RFA (OS) No.24/2014 & CM No.1321/2014 1. For the reasons stated in the application since appellant had sought review before the learned Single Judge of the impugned judgment and decree dated April 08, 2013 which was dismissed on January 10, 2014, we condone 243 days delay in filing the appeal.2. Vide impugned judgment and decree dated April 08, 2013 IA No.4674/2012 filed by the appellant under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been dismiss...
Tag this Judgment!Bhagirath Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:22. 01.2014 CRL. APPEAL NO.1408/2010 + BHAGIRATH Through: Appellant Mr. Aditya V. Singh and Mr. Arvinder Singh, Advs. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 11.4.2005, an information was received by the Police Control Room (PCR) with respect to some thieves having entered the house number A-14/110, Choti Masjid, Inderlok. The information was conveyed by PCR to Police Post Inderlok where it was recorded vide DD No.27 and the copy of the said DD was given to SI Sanjay Bhardwaj for investigation. The aforesaid police officer reached the house number A-14/106-B, Inderlok. The complainant Mrs. Rubina met him there and her statement was recorded by him. Ms. Rubina told him that on that day, she was present in her house with her family member, when three boys entered their house at about 8.45 pm. On entering the house,...
Tag this Judgment!Sheel Khanna and ors. Vs. Surinder Kaur Banga and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: January 22, 2014 + CM(M) No.1334/2012 & CM No.20442/2012 SHEEL KHANNA & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Verma & Mr.Ishaan Chhaya, Advs. versus SURINDER KAUR BANGA & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.R.P.Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Vaibhav Mehra, Adv. along with R-1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 20 th October, 2012 passed by the District Judge-cum-A.S.J.-Incharge (West)/ARCT, Delhi, whereby the appeal under Sections 14(1)(d) & (h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and upheld the order passed by the learned trial court directing the eviction of the petitioners from premises bearing No.AD-40, Tagore Garden, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as tenanted premises).2. Brief facts of the case are t...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Abhay Nath Jha Vs. Col. Satsangi Kiran Memorialpublic School and a ...
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. 01.2014 + W.P.(C) 479/2014 and CM No.943/2014 (stay) DR. ABHAY NATH JHA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS COL. SATSANGI'S KIRAN MEMORIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Aggarwal and Ms. Urmil Sharma, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. L.K. Garg, Advocate for R-2 with Mr. B.N. Mudgal, D.E.O., Zone-24 CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 Issue notice to the respondents.2. Mr. Garg, who accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.2, says he does not wish to file a reply.3. Since the issue raised, is only a question of law as facts necessary for disposal of the writ petition as presently positioned, are not in dispute, accordingly, I proceed to hear and dispose of the writ petition.4. This is a writ petition filed wherein, the following broad reliefs have been sought : (i) That respondent no.1 be directed to implement the order passed by the...
Tag this Judgment!S. Ravinder Singh and anr. Vs. S. Piara Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: January 22, 2014 + RC.REV. 241/2013 & CM No.10457/2013 S RAVINDER SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Amit Kumar, Adv. versus S PIARA SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr.S.S. Bhatia, Adv. with Mr.D.R. Bhatia and Mr.Naveen Arya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioners by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have assailed the eviction order dated 25th February, 2013 passed by Additional Rent Controller, South, Delhi.1. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioners in respect of a shop measuring 11 x 20.9ft in the front portion of property bearing No.1666-D, Govindpuri Extension, Main Road, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110016 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted shop), which was let out to the petitioners in the year 1985 for running furniture business an...
Tag this Judgment!