Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Brijinder Makkar Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 20.01.2014 Date of Decision:22. 01.2014 % + CRL. A. No.329 of 2010 SHALENDER KAUSHIK Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.330 of 2010 BRIJINDER MAKKAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.331 of 2010 S.P. KALIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.332 of 2010 MANOJ KAPUR ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. Through: versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/...
Dda Vs. Surjit Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 22, 2014 + LPA6162013 DDA Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate versus SURJIT SINGH & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) CM No.12958/2013 The application stands disposed of condoning the delay in filing the appeal. LPA No.616/2013 1. Learned counsel for the appellant states that DDA has taken a decision to allow respondents to continue to occupy Plot No.T-514, Jhandewalan Extension and that the occupation would be regularized. Thus, counsel urges that the appeal should be allowed and the impugned judgment and order dated March 07, 2013 allowing WP(C) No.5885/2012 filed by the respondents should be set aside.2. We need to go back to the year 1947. On the partition of India large scale migration took place from the te...
Raju and anr. Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:22. 01.2014 + Crl. Appeal No.49/2013 .Appellants RAJU AND ANR. Through : Mr Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Adv. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) Though this appeal purports to have been filed by two appellants namely Raju and Pardeep, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that in fact the appeal has been filed only by appellant Raju and the Vakalatnama filed along with the appeal has also been executed only by him. Accordingly, this has been considered as an appeal filed only by appellant Raju.1. On 26.02.2008, at about 11.38 PM, the Police Control Room was informed by a person that three persons had committed robbery of a mobile phone, purse, ring and cash amounting to Rs 450/- from the informant and the robbers had run towards Kushak Road. The aforesaid information when given to the Police Station Swaroop...
Mahavir Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.111 of 2008 MAHAVIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Sudeep Dey and Mr. Indrajeet Sircar, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2201.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15th January 2008 passed by the Special Judge, CBI in CC No.68 of 1999 and order on sentence dated 16th January 2008 convicting the Appellant for the offences under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for two years and a fine of Rs.2,500 under Section 7 of the PC Act and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for a period of two months and to further undergo RI for a period of two years and a fine of Rs.2,500 under Section 13(2) of the PC Act and in default of payment of a fine to underg...
S.P. Kalia Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 20.01.2014 Date of Decision:22. 01.2014 % + CRL. A. No.329 of 2010 SHALENDER KAUSHIK Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.330 of 2010 BRIJINDER MAKKAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.331 of 2010 S.P. KALIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/SEBI. + CRL. A. No.332 of 2010 MANOJ KAPUR ..... Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. Through: versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann & Mr. P.K. Pillai, Advs. for R-1/...
Ritnand Balved Education Foundation Vs. Paul Nanda and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 06, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : January 22, 2014 + RFA(OS) 3/2014 RITNAND BALVED EDUCATION FOUNDATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.R.Venkatramani, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Yadav, Mr.Vinay Garg, Mr.Rajan Chawla, Mr.Gautam Chauhan, Mr.Kameshwar Nath Tripathi and Mr.Shodhan Babu, Advocates versus PAUL NANDA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vedanta Varma, Advocate RFA(OS) 4/2014 RITNAND BALVED EDUCATION FOUNDATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.R.Venkatramani, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Yadav, Mr.Vinay Garg, Mr.Rajan Chawla, Mr.Gautam Chauhan, Mr.Kameshwar Nath Tripathi and Mr.Shodhan Babu, Advocates versus PAUL NANDA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vedanta Varma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We shall hereinafter be referring to Ritna...
Madan Lal Vs. the State (Govt. of National Capital Territory) of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :22. d JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 768/2000 MADAN LAL Through : ....Appellant Mr.Jitendra Sethi, Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Kaushik & Mr.Hemendra Jailia, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY) OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Madan Lal (the appellant) questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 17.11.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.499/96 arising out of FIR No.214/85 PS Subzi Mandi by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. By an order dated 23.11.2000, he was awarded RI for three years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 29.04.1985 at about 09.45 P.M. in front of house No.10621, Gali No.6, Andha Mugal, he inflicted injuries to Tara Chand in an attempt to murder him. During the course of investigatio...
Gurbachan Singh Sachdeva Vs. Gurbachan Singh Puri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: January 22, 2014 + RC.REV. 348/2012 & C.M. No.12815/2012 GURBACHAN SINGH SACHDEVA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Prag Chawla, Adv. with Mr.Sudeep Sudan, Adv. versus GURBACHAN SINGH PURI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gursharan Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has assailed the eviction order dated 31st May, 2012 passed by Additional Rent Controller, Central, Delhi.1. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioner in respect of shop no.1 bearing (private) No.20222023, Bank Street, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted shop) which was let out to the petitioner in the year 1973 for running a clinic at a monthly rent of `175. The respondent is retired from ...
Jagan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:16.01.2014 Judgment delivered on:22.01.2014. CRL.A. No.145/2000 Through: ..Appellant Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv. Through: ..Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP. JAGAN versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 13.11.1997 and 17.11.1997 respectively vide which he had been convicted under Sections 366 and 376 of the IPC and had been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 84 months and to pay a fine of Rs.8400/-; in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for a period of 12 months for the offence under; separately for both the offences. 2 The case of the prosecution emanates from the statement of the prosecutrix Kumari Kanchan examined as PW-4. Crl.A. No.145/2000 Incident is dated Page 1 of 15 07.9.1996. As per her version while she was going to school to appear for her examination in the morning at 7.00 a.m. when s...
Central Warehousing Corporation Vs. Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d January, 2014 % + + ITA3082013 ITA3092013 CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Husnal Syali Nagi and Mr. Harkunal Singh, Advocates. versus CIT Through: .....Respondent Mr. Rohit Madan with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT: (OPEN COURT) The assessee by way of this appeal impugns the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 09.09.2011. The impugned order dismissed the appeal preferred by the assessee.2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant, a statutory corporation, claimed the benefit of Section 10(29) contending that its income was exempted from taxation as it carried on warehousing and storage activity. The original assessment for AY199596 was made on 22.01.1998. The assessees contentions were accepted in respect of a portion of...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »