Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shree Adya Katyayani Shaktipeeth(Mandir) Trust and O Vs. Shri P.P.Shri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 07.2013 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2014 CS(OS) 1798/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10428-29/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH (MANDIR) TRUST & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates along with Mr. J.N.Pruthi, Trustee for the plaintiff. versus SHRI P.P. SHRIVASTAV Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1799/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10431-32/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH (MANDIR) TRUST & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates along with Mr. J.N. Pruthi, Trustee for the plaintiff. versus SHRI SHASHI BHUSHAN SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1800/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10434-35/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mr...
Medical Council of India Vs. Prashant Kumar Gupta and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2014 % + LPA702014, CM No.1451/2014 (for stay), CM No.1452/2014 (for exemption), CM No.1453/2014 (permission to file lengthy synopsis), CM No.1454/2014 (for condonation of 24 days delay in filing the appeal) and CM No.1455/2014 (for condonation of 18 days delay in refiling). MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. T. Singhdev, Adv. versus PRASHANT KUMAR GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar &Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advs. for R-2/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 30th September, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.6452/2012 preferred by the respondent no.1 (respondent no.2 is the Union of India) directing the appellant to grant provisional registration under Section 25(1) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 to the respondent no.1 i...
Jagbir @ Jaggi Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h December, 2013 DECIDED ON :24. h January, 2014 + CRL.A. 355/2003 JAGBIR @ JAGGI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mir Akhtar Hussain, Advocate with appellant present in person. VERSUS STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Jagbir Singh @ Jaggi (the appellant) impugns the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 12.05.2003 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.17/2002 arising out of FIR No.609/1999 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar by which he was convicted for committing offence under Section 392 and 186 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 16.05.2003, he was awarded rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine `5,000/- under Section 392 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for two months under Section 186 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 03.07.1999 at about 03.20 P.M...
Ashok Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.335/1998 Reserved on:3. d January, 2014 Date of Decision:24. h January, 2014 % ASHOK KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: Appellant-Ashok Kumar by the impugned Judgment dated 31st July, 1998 stands convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his wife Anita Jain.2. The undisputed and accepted position is that the appellant got married to Anita Jain on 27th April, 1990 and within 26 days of marriage i.e., on the morning of 23rd May, 1990, she was found dead in the bedroom of her matrimonial house.3. The aforesaid facts have been established from the testimonies of Kaushalya (PW-1), Mahinder Prasad (PW-8) and Sunil Kumar (PW13), mother, father and brother of the deceased, respectively. We shall be referrin...
Shri Rakesh Kumar JaIn Vs. Shri VipIn Kumar JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
$~07. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 170/2007 % Judgment dated 24.01.2014 SHRI RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.S.C. Singhal, Adv. along with plaintiff. versus SHRI VIPIN KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Mahesh K. Chaudhary, Adv. for defendants no.1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for partition. A preliminary decree has been passed by this Court as far back as on 25.8.2008 holding that plaintiff and defendants no.1 to 3 shall have 1/4 th share, each, in the suit property bearing no.A-55, Arihant Nagar, Main Rohtak Road, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi. On 25.8.2008, a Local Commissioner was also appointed to suggest the modes of partition. It was agreed between the parties that the suit property cannot be divided by metes and bounds. Thereafter the matter has been adjourned from time to time to enable the parties to sell the suit property. Meanwhile, as agreed, an applica...
Omkar Singh (Since Deceased) Thru Lrs Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: January 21, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: January 24, 2014 W.P.(C) 6418/2001 OMKAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THRU LRS .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Vaneessa Singh, Advocate with Ms.Sadhvi Shashi, Advocate W.P.(C) 6419/2001 BRAHAM PRAKASH SINGH .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vineet Tayal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Since common questions of law and fact arise for consideration in the two above captioned writ petitions, they were heard together and hence are being decided by a singular order. Albeit pursuant to two separate charge sheets issued to them and inquiry proceedings being separate, the indictment against the petitioners and ...
Vicky @ Vikas Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:24. 01.2014 + Crl. Appeal No.182/2013 VICKY @ VIKAS .Appellant Through: Mr R.S. Mishra, Adv. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 07.7.2008, at about 12.30 AM, the injured Monu was brought to Babu Jagjivan Ram Memorial Ram Hospital with history of physical assault. The information in this regard was given by the duty Constable to Police Station Jahangir Puri and ASI Mangat Ram was deputed to investigate the case. The Investigating Officer reached the aforesaid hospital and recorded the statement of the injured who was fit for statement. In his statement, the injured Monu stated that on that day at about 12.00 midnight when he was returning home and reached near the park of Jahangir Puri, Vicky @ Vikas @ Kalia, son of Munilal, resident of J-1061 Jahangir Puri, who as previously known to him was standing near the park with two ...
Rama Kant Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 2 of 2008 Reserved on: January 17, 2014 Decision on: January 24, 2014 RAMA KANT SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aeshna Dahiya and Mr. Kshatrasahl Raj, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGEMENT2401.2014 1. Mr. Rama Kant Sharma has, in this appeal, challenged the judgment dated 23rd November 2007 and the order of sentence dated 26th November 2007 passed by the learned Special Judge in Complaint 77 of 2002 arising out of the First Information Report (FIR) No.33 of 2001, holding the Appellant/accused guilty of the offence under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and a fine of Rs. 20,000, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months.2. The accused remained on bail throughout the period of trial. Durin...
National Insurance Company Vs. Heera Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. h January, 2014 MAC.APP. 1069/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. versus HEERA LAL ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hari Narayan Takkar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 04.07.2012, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.1,42,000/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of institution of the petition, i.e., 22.01.2009 till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Tribunal has further directed to pay Rs.25,000/- towards lawyers fee and Rs.5,000/- towards out of pocket expenses.3. The appellant is aggrieved with the interest @ 12% per annum and an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards lawyers fee and Rs.5,000/- towards out of pocket expenses.4. On the issue of interest amount, ld. Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties have no objection if the intere...
M/S. Shree Hari Vansh Collection Vs. M/S. Venus Garments
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.243/2013 24th January, 2014 % M/S. SHREE HARI VANSH COLLECTION ......Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh, Advocate. VERSUS M/S. VENUS GARMENTS Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Paramjeet Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgments of the Courts below; of the trial Court dated 18.12.2012 and the appellate Court dated 7.9.2013; by which the suit of the respondent/plaintiff under Order 37 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been decreed for a sum of Rs.2,22,748/alongwith interest @ 12% per annum.2. As per the suit plaint filed by the respondent/plaintiff the appellant/defendant had received garments and for which two bill Nos.119 and 120 were raised. Since these bills were not paid, a demand notice dated 17.10.2010 was served upon the appellant/defendan...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »