Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Gayatri Gupta Vs. Smt. Ruby Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.C.P.(O) 09 of 2008 in CS(OS) 1696 of 2007 + Date of Decision:30. h August, 2013 # ! SMT. GAYATRI GUPTA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Anand, Adv. Versus Respondent Through: Mr. A.Maitri,advocate for respondent-contemnor Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Adv. for defendant nos.2 & 3 in suit Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. for defendant no.5 in suit $ SMT. RUBY SHARMA * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: In the suit for specific performance of contract dated 4th June,2007 for sale of one DDA flat in Dwarka entered into between the plaintiff-vendee and the respondent-vendor, who was the sole defendant at the time of the institution of the suit, this Court had by an ex parte order dated 14th September, 2007 restrained the sole defendant Ruby Sharma, who is now the sole respondent in this contempt petition, from creating any third party interest in the suit property till the next date of hearing which was fixed for 13th November,2007. The re...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rakesh Ahuja and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h July, 2013 Pronounced on:30. h August, 2013 + MAC.APP. 185/2009 TARA SHARMA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. with Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Adv. versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. & ORS...... Respondent Through: Mr. D.D. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Arati Mahajan, Adv. for R-4/DTC. + MAC.APP. 236/2009 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. versus RAKESH AHUJA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. with Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-3. MAC.APP. 238/2009 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. versus RAKESH AHUJA & ORS Through: MAC. APP. 185/2009, 236/2009 & 238/20092 ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. with Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-3 to R-6. Page 1 of 11 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J...
Jai Pal Aggarwal Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 5576/2012 JAI PAL AGGARWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sumit Bansal, Mr. Ateev Mathur and Mr. Anil Sharma, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Dr. Prashant, CGSC, North Zone and Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner, on superannuation from this Court, was issued a CGHS card valid till November, 2014. In November, 2010, the petitioner visited Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute, Paschim Vihar for treatment of some urinal problem developed by him and was advised prostatic biopsy suspecting that he may be suffering from prostatic cancer. The biopsy report revealed that the petitioner was having adenocarcinoma, prostate gleason score 8(3+5). He was advised MRI of the pelvis region which was carried on 24.6.2011. On 21.7.2011, the petitioner went to Gurgaon to attend a family function. Durin...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-iv Vs. Dcm Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 98/2013 Reserved on:13. h August, 2013 Date of decision:30. h August, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-IV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus DCM LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV (hereinafter referred to as the appellant/Revenue) is directed against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 13th April, 2012 in the case of DCM Limited, and relates to Assessment Year 2002-03.2. The contention of the Revenue is that penalty for concealment under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act was rightly imposed as during the course of the assessment proceedings the assessee had made a wrong claim in respect of loss suffered on writi...
Onmobile Global Limited Vs. Star India Private Limited and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:07. 05.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2013 % + FAO(OS) 160/2013, CAV 265/2013, CAV 266/2013, CM APPL. 4880/2013, CM APPL. 4881/2013, CM APPL. 4882/2013 ONMOBILE GLOBAL LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dushyant A. Dave, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Rohan Thawani, Ms. Kriti Singh Gehlout, Ms. Noor Anand and Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocates. versus STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Nidhiram and Mr. Krishna Mohan, Advocates. Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mr. Prateek Chadha and Mr. Anirban Sen, Advocates for BCCI. FAO(OS) 161/2013, CAV 267/2013, CAV 268/2013, CM APPL. 4883/2013, CM APPL. 4884/2013 IDEA CELLULAR LTD. Through: FAO(OS) Nos.153, 160 & 161/2013 ..... Appellant Mr. Navin Chawla, Ms. Sonali Jait...
iqbal Ahmad Khan Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
$~R-5A (Part-IB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h August, 2013. + W.P.(C) 1395/1995 IQBAL AHMAD KHAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vivek Sood and Ms. Janhavi Mahana, Advocates. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ORS. ....Respondent Through Ms. Meera Bhatia, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. Iqbal Ahmad Khan, resident of Meerut City, U.P. and a citizen of India, invokes writ jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer that the respondent No.1 i.e. Collector of Customs, New Delhi should restore and restitute the revolver imported by him.2. In December, 1984, the petitioner visited Singapore and had purchased a revolver (make: Smith and Wesson) and a double barrel gun. He obtained a letter dated 24th December, 1984 from the High Commission of India at Singapore that arms could be imported into India under the Baggage Rules, if they were covered by a valid arm possession licenc...
Gurnam Singh Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 3611/2011 GURNAM SINGH Through: Mr Jasmeet Singh, Adv ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms Kailash Golani, Adv for Union of India. Mr Charanjeet Singh, Adv for respondents 2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner before this Court claims to be a victim of the riots which took place in Delhi in October/November, 1984. According to the petitioner at the time the said riots took place, he was residing with his family members, including his parents in DDA Flat No. 1646, Janta Flats, Nand Nagri, Shahdara. On 09.11.1984, the petitioner submitted a complaint to SHO, Police Station Seema Puri, alleging therein that in the communal riots on 02.11.1984 his Taxi bearing No DLT 216.had been burnt down and the household articles detailed in the complaint were also looted away.2. The following were the household articles mentioned in the sai...
idea Cellular Ltd. Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:07. 05.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2013 % + FAO(OS) 160/2013, CAV 265/2013, CAV 266/2013, CM APPL. 4880/2013, CM APPL. 4881/2013, CM APPL. 4882/2013 ONMOBILE GLOBAL LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dushyant A. Dave, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Rohan Thawani, Ms. Kriti Singh Gehlout, Ms. Noor Anand and Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocates. versus STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Nidhiram and Mr. Krishna Mohan, Advocates. Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mr. Prateek Chadha and Mr. Anirban Sen, Advocates for BCCI. FAO(OS) 161/2013, CAV 267/2013, CAV 268/2013, CM APPL. 4883/2013, CM APPL. 4884/2013 IDEA CELLULAR LTD. Through: FAO(OS) Nos.153, 160 & 161/2013 ..... Appellant Mr. Navin Chawla, Ms. Sonali Jait...
Rakesh @ Commando Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:26. 8.2013 Judgment delivered on:30.8.2013 + CRL.A. 724/2009 RAKESH @ COMMANDO Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Siddhartha Das, Mr.Nitin Saluja, Mr.Shiv Pande, Mr.Shiv Chopra and Mr.Amit Singh Rathor, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Sunil Sharma, APP for the State. Inspector Kuldeep Singh, SHO, Defence Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 18.7.2009 and 31.7.2009 vide which he had been convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC and had been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.3000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for three months. 2 Briefly stated the case of the prosecution is that on 25.7.2007 Kamal Kishore (PW-9) was celebrating his birthday at his residence A-25, Sadiq Nagar. He had invited h...
State Vs. Mohan Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30.08.2013 CRL.L.P. 378/2012 STATE Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) along with Inspector J.P. Meena, P.S. Jahangirpur. versus MOHAN KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No. 13219/2012 (delay of 60 days) 1 In view of the averments contained in the instant application, delay of 60 days in filing the leave to appeal is condoned. 2 Application disposed of. CRL.L.P. 378/2012 3 State has filed the present leave to appeal seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 28.02.2012 whereby the charge-sheet filed by the State against the three respondents under Sections 302/394/397/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) had been dismissed; the impugned judgment had noted that there are several dents in the case of...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »