Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

idea Cellular Ltd. Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

idea Cellular Ltd. vs Star India Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 30, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1022981

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

idea Cellular Ltd.

Advocate Mr. Dushyant A. Dave, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Rohan Thawani, Ms. Kriti Singh Gehlout, Ms. Noor Anand, Ms. Ruchi Jain, Mr. Parag Tripathi, Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Ms. Sneha Jain

Respondent

Star India Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on:07. 05.2013 pronounced on:30. 08.2013 % + fao(os) 160/2013, cav 265/2013, cav 266/2013, cm appl. 4880/2013, cm appl. 4881/2013, cm appl. 4882/2013 onmobile global limited ..... appellant through: mr. dushyant a. dave, senior advocate, mr. sanjay jain, senior advocate with mr. hardeep singh anand, ms. vandana sehgal, mr. rohan thawani, ms. kriti singh gehlout, ms. noor anand and ms. ruchi jain, advocates. versus star india private limited & anr. ..... respondents through: mr. parag tripathi, senior advocate with mr. saikrishna rajagopal, mr. sidharth chopra, ms. sneha jain, mr. nidhiram and mr. krishna mohan, advocates. mr. abhinav vashisht, senior advocate with ms. radha rangaswamy, mr. prateek chadha and mr. anirban sen, advocates for bcci. fao(os) 161/2013, cav 267/2013, cav 268/2013, cm appl. 4883/2013, cm appl. 4884/2013 idea cellular ltd. through: fao(os) nos.153, 160 & 161/2013 ..... appellant mr. navin chawla, ms. sonali jaitley and mr. eshan manchanda, advocates. page 1 versus star india pvt. ltd. & anr. ..... respondents through: mr. parag tripathi, senior advocate with mr. saikrishna rajagopal, mr. sidharth chopra, ms. sneha jain, mr. nidhiram and mr. krishna mohan, advocates. mr. abhinav vashisht, senior advocate with ms. radha rangaswamy, mr. prateek chadha and mr. anirban sen, advocates for bcci. coram: hon'ble mr. justice s. ravindra bhat hon'ble mr. justice najmi waziri mr. justice s.ravindra bhat % 1. the present appeals are allowed in terms of the separate judgment passed today in fao(os) 153/2013 titled akuate internet services pvt. ltd. & anr. versus star india pvt. ltd. & anr. s. ravindra bhat (judge) najmi waziri (judge) august 30 2013 fao(os) nos.153, 160 & 161/2013 page 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:

07. 05.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:

30. 08.2013 % + FAO(OS) 160/2013, CAV 265/2013, CAV 266/2013, CM APPL. 4880/2013, CM APPL. 4881/2013, CM APPL. 4882/2013 ONMOBILE GLOBAL LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dushyant A. Dave, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Rohan Thawani, Ms. Kriti Singh Gehlout, Ms. Noor Anand and Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocates. versus STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Nidhiram and Mr. Krishna Mohan, Advocates. Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mr. Prateek Chadha and Mr. Anirban Sen, Advocates for BCCI. FAO(OS) 161/2013, CAV 267/2013, CAV 268/2013, CM APPL. 4883/2013, CM APPL. 4884/2013 IDEA CELLULAR LTD. Through: FAO(OS) Nos.153, 160 & 161/2013 ..... Appellant Mr. Navin Chawla, Ms. Sonali Jaitley and Mr. Eshan Manchanda, Advocates. Page 1 versus STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Nidhiram and Mr. Krishna Mohan, Advocates. Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mr. Prateek Chadha and Mr. Anirban Sen, Advocates for BCCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeals are allowed in terms of the separate judgment passed today in FAO(OS) 153/2013 titled Akuate Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Versus Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) NAJMI WAZIRI (JUDGE) AUGUST 30 2013 FAO(OS) Nos.153, 160 & 161/2013 Page 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial