Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sushila Devi Vs. Ravinder Prasad

Sushila Devi vs Ravinder Prasad

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 20, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/957103

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushila Devi

Advocate Mr. Ajit Nair

Respondent

Ravinder Prasad

Excerpt

* high court of delhi at new delhi + cm.(m). no.332/13 & cm no.4858/13 decided on :20. h march, 2013 sushila devi through: appellant mr. ajit nair, adv. versus ravinder prasad respondent coram: honble mr. justice v.k. shali v.k. shali, j.(oral) 1. this is a petition under article 227 of the constitution of india against the impugned order dated 12.02.2013.2. the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show any irregularity, impropriety or any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. accordingly, the petition is dismissed. v.k. shali, j.march 20 2013

Full Judgment

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM.(M). NO.332/13 & CM No.4858/13 Decided on :

20. h March, 2013 SUSHILA DEVI Through: Appellant Mr. Ajit Nair, Adv. Versus RAVINDER PRASAD Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.

(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 12.02.2013.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show any irregularity, impropriety or any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. V.K. SHALI, J.

MARCH 20 2013

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial