Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sarfraj Vs. the State

Sarfraj vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 21, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1097911

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sarfraj

Respondent

The State

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on :27. h september, 2013 decided on :21. t november, 2013 + crl.a. 352/2003 sher singh ..... appellant through : mr.mukul sharma, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state (delhi administration) ..... respondent through : mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. + crl.a. 258/2003 sudesh ..... appellant through : mr.mukul sharma, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state (govt. of nct of delhi) ..... respondent through : mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. + crl.a.299/2003 raj kumar ..... appellant through : mr.madhu mukul tripathi, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state through : crl.a.no.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... respondent mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. page 1 of 2 and + crl.a. 422/2003 sarfraj ..... appellant through : mr.mukul sharma, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state through : ..... respondent mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. coram: hon’ble mr. justice s.p.garg s.p.garg, j.the present appeals are allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of crl.a.no.232/2003 titled ‘kamlesh kumar @ k.k. vs. the state (government of n.c.t. of delhi)’. (s.p.garg) judge november21 2013/tr

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :

27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :

21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 352/2003 SHER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 258/2003 SUDESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A.299/2003 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : Crl.A.No.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. Page 1 of 2 AND + CRL.A. 422/2003 SARFRAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.

The present appeals are allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.232/2003 titled ‘Kamlesh Kumar @ K.K. vs. The State (Government of N.C.T. of Delhi)’. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE NOVEMBER21 2013/tr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial