Delhi Court November 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State Through Cbi Vs. Dr. Nagendra Pal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-1993
Reported in: 53(1994)DLT106; ILR1994Delhi127
ORDER1. The facts giving rise to this petition are that during the year 1979 Dr. N. P. Singh, the respondent herein, when he was a Professor & Head of the Department in Willingdon Hospital formed an association, namely, National Association of Critical Cure Medicine India (N.A.C.C.M.). Sub-sequently he moved the office of the Registrar of Firms and Societies, Directorate of Industries, Delhi Administration, Delhi on 7th December, 1979 for registration of the same. He submitted a Memorandum of Association containing the names of seven doctors as its Executive Members. Later on a fresh Memorandum of Association containing the names of eight doctors as members was submitted to the Registrar's Office as the earlier one was found to be incomplete and did not fulfill the requisite conditions. During investigation it was found that the Registrar of Society believed the documents as genuine and registered the same and a Registration Certificate No. 10874 dated 22-3-80 was issued under the Soci...
Rajinder Kakkar and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-1993
Reported in: 1994IAD(Delhi)432; 54(1994)DLT484; 1994(28)DRJ133
B.N. Kirpal,J.(1) Six persons claiming to be owners of different plots of land in Village Kishan Garh in the revenue estate of Mehrauli, New Delhi have filed the present writ petition challenging the action of the respondents, which has been taken and/or being proposed ; to be taken, for demolishing structures which have been erected by the petitioners on the said plots. The petitioners also challenge the validity of the entries in the revenue records viz., Khasra Girdawri in respect of the lands which they profess to own.(2) The first two petitioners claim to have purchased land measuring 570 Sq.Yards from one Smt. Kusum Lata. It is averred in the writ petition that this land was purchased on the basis of an agreement to .sell executed by her in the name of both the petitioners jointly. Copy of the agreement to sell has not been placed on the record but the claim of the said petitioners is that they have been in occupation of the property in question since 13th June, 1986.(3) Petition...
Jinal Strips Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: (1995)(80)ELT603TriDel
1. This stay application is filed by the applicants under Section 129E of the Customs Act for the waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting Rs. 16,67,936/-.2. Shri D.N. Mehta, ld. Advocate appearing for the applicants submitted that the matter relates to interpretation of Notification No. 77/90 dated 23-3-1990. He said that the applicants had imported refractory bricks of special quality for ADD furnace (Argon Oxygen Decarburizer).The applicants claimed that refractory bricks are classifiable under Chapter Heading 69.02 of the Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Notification No. 77/90 dated 23-3-1990. The exemption was denied by the Collector in the impugned order on the ground that the AOD converter for which bricks were imported was not industrial furnace and therefore, the bricks imported were not eligible for the benefit of concessional rate of exemption duty in terms of Exemption Notification No. 77/90. Shri D.N. Mehta said that refractory bricks imported are entitle...
Gora Mal Hari Ram Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: (1994)LC626Tri(Delhi)
1. This is an appeal filed by M/s. Gora Mal Hari Ram Ltd., New Delhi, against the Order-in-Appeal No. 134/CE/Appeal/DLH/92, dated 30-4-1992, passed by the Collector, Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi.2. The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of detergent cakes and detergent/washing powder. The goods were sold by them through their distributors. They were having distributors for Delhi region and distributors for outstation. They filed separate price lists for Delhi distributors and for outstation distributors. Higher prices were declared for Delhi distributors and lower prices were declared for outstation distributors. In both the cases the sales were effected at the factory gate, and in both the cases the price lists were filed in Part I of the price list proforma. Part I of the price list proforma related to the determination of value for goods sold to unrelated buyers in the course of wholesale trade, under the main definition case, in terms of the provisions of Section 4(...
M/S. Jhalani Tools (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. B.K. Soni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: 53(1994)DLT9; 1994(28)DRJ181
ORDER1. Under clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Act (hereinafter called the Act) a landlord can recover possession of the premises let out to a tenant provided; (1) he is the owner of the' premises; (2) the premises had been let out for residential purposes only; (3) he bona' fide requires the same for his own residence or for the residence of this family members dependent upon him and lastly; (4) he has no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation.2. In the year 1985 the landlord in this case namely Mr. B. K. Somi filed an eviction petition under the provisions noticed above against his tenant M/s. Jhalani Tools (India) Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Gedore Tools (India) Pvt. Ltd.) with regard to premises bearing municipal number D-66, Gulmohar Park, New Delhi. Claiming himself to be the owner-landlord of the premises, he alleged that the premises had been let out for residential purpose only and that he bona fide required the same for himself and h...
Simon Anthony Vs. Raj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: 53(1994)DLT371
J.K. Mehra, J.1. I have heard the parties at length on this application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC for setting aside the ex parte decree. The only ground raised in the application is that there was no proper service on the defendant. From the record, I find that summons were duly delivered at the address of the defendant and same were received by one Ms. Mukta Rani, who according to process server's report represented herself as wife of the defendant. But the name of the defendant's wife is stated to be Smt. Kaushalya and not Smt. Mukta Rani. 2. The award was published in the presence of the parties on 20.8.1988. The award was duly filed in this court and notices were issued. The claimant accepted notice in this court through his counsel. The respondent was served in the manner stated above. The case was adjourned on various dates for arguments on the question as to whether service upon Ms. Mukta Rani was sufficient. In the circumstances, and finally, after feeling...
A.R. Chadha and Co. (1) Pvt. Ltd Vs. Chief Fire Officer and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: 1994(28)DRJ167
A.B. Saharya, J. (1) The short question involved in this petition is whether the petitioner is entitled to renewal of the license granted to him for running a Video Cinema in the premises in question. The grant and renewal of such a license is regulated by the Delhi Cinematograph (Exhibition of Films by Video Cassette Recorder/Player) Rules, 1986, hereinafter referred to as 'Video Cinema Rules'. Rule 4 indicates various requirements for grant of license. Same conditions must be fulfillled for the purpose of renewal-of the alicense. The only controversy that has arisen is about grant of No Objection Certificate by the Chief Fire Officer, as required under Clause (vi) of Rule 4, which reads as. follows: 'No Objection Certificate from the Chief Fire Officer regarding suitability of the premises from the point of view of fire safety and means of ingress and egress'.(2) The No Objection Certificate is required, obviously, in respect of the premises that may be used for running the Video Cin...
Mohan Kumar Vs. Narendra Products
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)585; 1993(27)DRJ553
J.K. Mehra, J. (1) This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for alleged passing off by the defendant of its goods as those of the plaintiff by adopting the trade mark Shankar with a pre-fix 'Sarvpriya'. The prefix appears in very small letters. The plaintiff is alleged to have adopted the trade mark Shankar with a pre-fix 'Jai Shiv' appearing in very small letters. Thus predominant mark which is most prominent on the container of the product in both the cases, is 'SHANKAR' in both the cases. The product being marketed is Scented Supari (Betal nut power) and Pan Masala. (2) Notice of the suit was served on the defendant and the defendant filed the written statement and reply to the application for interim injunction taking up the plea that they in fact are the prior user of the alleged offending mark and the plaintiffs have copied the trade mark Shankar as well as colour scheme of their pouches for Pan Masala. The defendants have not given any sales figures for their ...
Rajiv Agarwal Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)826; 1994(28)DRJ159
Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) On a consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the reference made to the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour Courts constituted under the provision of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, should be dealt with the members of the Delhi Higher Judicial Services and not by the members of the Delhi Judicial Service as we are aware that in most of the States of the country, such like tribunals are being manned by the members of the Higher Judicial Service.(2) A similar matter relating to the constitution of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in Delhi came up before the court in C.W. 2887/91 Hi Lawyers Forum for civil liberties v. Union of India and by order dated 4.12.1991, this court issued a direction to the Govern- ment of India that the Motor accident claims in Delhi should be manned by the members of Delhi Higher Judicial Service. That order was carried out by Union of India.(3) In this case we have been waiting for the Union of India to make the order itself but...
Sudershan Kumar and anr. Vs. Hindu Undivided Family Inder SaIn JaIn an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)749; 1993(27)DRJ632
Sat Pal, J.(1) This application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Order 40 Rule I and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') and in this application it has been prayed that a receiver be appointed with directions to take possession of the drawing-cum-dining room of house No.C-4/4A, Model Town, Delhi.(2) Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the plaintiffs who are the sons of Shri Inder Sain Jain, defendant No.2, have filed the present suit for partition. Along with the plaint the plaintiffs had also filed an application bearing is No.3178-A/90 under Order 26 Rule9andsection 151 oftheCode. This application came up for hearing on 25th April, 1990and on that date a learned Single Judge of this Court appointed Shri Subash Chander Gupta, advocate also local Commissioner to inspect the premises bearing No.C-4/4A, Model Town, Delhi and to report about the actual possession of the parties to the suit in different portions of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »