Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suman Kumar Singh Raghav & Anr. vs Bar Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 561/2026 SUMAN KUMAR SINGH RAGHAV & ANR. .....Petitioners Through:versusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Preetpal Singh, Ms. Medha Sharma, Ms. Pooja, Ms. Simran Kumari and Mr. Gaurav, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent / Bar Council ofIndia that order in B.C.I. Tr. Case No.596/2024 has been pronounced.2. In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in thepresent petition.3. The same is accordingly, disposed of.4. Needless to say, the rights and remedies of the petitioner in respect ofthe aforesaid order are reserved.SACHIN DATTA, JMAY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning th...
Mithlesh vs Khursheed Alam
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 579/2026 MITHLESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dixit, Adv. (through v/c)versusKHURSHEED ALAM .....Respondent Through: Ms. Tanvi Madan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the presentpetition.2. The same is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.SACHIN DATTA, JMAY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 13:01:15...
Alcon Company Pvt Ltd vs Khim Ram
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3604/2025, CM APPL.16861/2025, 16862/2025 ALCON COMPANY PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Ms. Rinku Narula, Ms. Poonam Nagpal, Mr. Anugrah Ekka and Mr. Kanishk Taneja, Advocates.versusKHIM RAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Parashar, Advocate (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026CM APPL. 37834/2026 (seeking disposal of WPC in terms of settlement agreement dated 14-05-2026)1. By way of this application, it is brought out that a settlementagreement has been executed between the parties. The said agreement dated 14.05.2026 has been placed on record. It is submitted that all outstanding disputes between the parties have been resolved in terms thereof.2. Accordingly, W.P.(C) 3604/2025, as also the pending applications,are disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement. The parties shall remain bound in terms thereof.3. As contemplated in the settlement agr...
Hema Kumari vs Sh Prashant Goyal & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 771/2026 HEMA KUMARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. (DHCLSC), Ms. Ridhima Gaur and Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advs.versusSH PRASHANT GOYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh, Advocate along with Mr. Harjeet Singh Panwar, Food Supply Officer for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid).1. Mr. Harjeet Singh Panwar, Food Supply Officer (FSO), is present inCourt on behalf of the respondent. He makes a categorical statement that upon the petitioner submitting the requisite Income Certificate, the Ration- Card shall be issued to the petitioner immediately thereafter.2. The said statement is taken on record.3. Binding the respondent to the aforesaid statement, the present petition is disposed of.4. List for reporting compliance on 07.09.2026.5. It is made clear that in case of non-comp...
Alcob Transmissions Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorize Representative Sh. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 689/2026 ALCOB TRANSMISSIONS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE SH. LALIT KUMAR HARJAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravikant Chandhok, Mr. Vasdev Lalwani and Mr. Tushar Sahni, Advocates Mob: 98112213677 Email: [email protected] FERROUS PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), for appointment of a sole Arbitrator, for adjudication of disputes between the parties, arising out of the Purchase Order dated 15th June, 2024 (PO).2. None appears for the respondents, despite service.3. This Court notes that vide order dated 07th May, 2026, this Court hadclarified that, in case, respondents do not put in appearance, or file their replies, the Court shall proceed with the matter.4. Accordingly, this...
Virender vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1761/2026 VIRENDER .....Applicant Through: Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Adv. (through VC)versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi and Ms. Niketa Manish, Advocates with SI Sameer, PS: Swaroop Nagar Mr. Sarthak Karol, DHCLSC, Ms. Neelakshi Bhaduaria and Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. The present matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday.2. Learned counsel for applicant seeks to withdraw the present application.3. As such, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 29, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:06:16...
M/S Shri Uday Gold Palace vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5285/2026 M/S SHRI UDAY GOLD PALACE ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohtisham Ali, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Dubey, SPC for R1 Mr. Shivang Singh , Mr. Pulin Kumar, Advs. for R2 Mr. Abhishek Baid, Mr. Mohit Kumar Bafna, Mr. Praneet Das and Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocates for R4/RBICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.05.20261. Since there was a holiday on 28.05.2026, the matter was taken up forhearing today.2. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction, thereby directing Respondent No. 2 (HDFCBank Ltd.) to forthwith defreeze the Petitioners aforesaid bank account and restore full operational access thereto; b) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction calling for the records and quashin...
Abhishek Singh vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1567/2026 ABHISHEK SINGH .....Applicant Through: Mr. Ranbir Singh Kundu, Mr. Shitanshu Saklani, Mr. Shubham Mavi and Mr. Naved Ali, AdvocatesversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Ms. Apoorva Khosla, Advocates alongwith Insp. Sandeep Kumar, PS Patparganj Industrial AreaCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the applicant seeks grant of interim bail for a period of one month in proceedings arising out of FIR No.337/2024 dated 15.08.2024 registered at PS: Patparganj Industrial Area under Sections 406/408/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).2. Learned counsel for applicant submits that the applicant is thesole bread earner of his family consisting of his wife and two minor daughters aged a...
Abhishek Malik @ Mota vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1570/2026 ABHISHEK MALIK @ MOTA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Jayant Tewari, Mr. Kaushal Aggarwal, Mr. Sagar Singh, Mr. Vikram Singh, Ms. Pooja Rani and Mr. Satish Kumar, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Niketa Manish, Advs. with SI Parag Khatana, PS: KrishangarhCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.05.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the applicant seeks grant of interim bail for a period of thirty days in the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 360/2021 dated 18.10.2021 registered at PS.: Krishangarh, Delhi under Sections 307/201/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) and under Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Arms Act)and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. At the outset, learned APP for the State has handed ov...
Suresh Chand vs Rohtash and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 246/2023 SURESH CHAND .....Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Teotia and Mr. Jai Prakash, Advs. with appellant in person.versusROHTASH AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Vandana Kahlon & Mr. Rudra Kahlon, Advs. for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 29.05.2026CM APPL. 37853/2026 (Early hearing)1. This application has been filed seeking early hearing of the appeal.2. In view of the reasons disclosed in the application, the applicationstands allowed and disposed of. MAC.APP. 246/20233. Counsel for parties, state that the matter has been settled for Rs.2,78,460/-.4. Mr. Rudra, counsel for respondent no.3/Insurance Company, statesthat the amount shall be paid to appellant/claimant within a period of four weeks.5. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of the settlementarrived at between parties.6. Date already fixed i.e. 10th September, 2026 stands cancelled.7. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »