Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhavya Gupta & Anr. vs Deutsche Bank Ag & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
$~173 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1241/2026 BHAVYA GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari Advocate and Mr. Sushant Bali AdvocateversusDEUTSCHE BANK AG & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Adv Mr Dhaval Mehrotra and Adv Ms Aditi Desai for R3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 26.05.2026CM APPL. 37052/2026 1. This is an application seeking early hearing of the present writ petition on the ground that the petitioners and the respondent No.1 have arrived at a settlement. 2. As per the petitioners, the understanding reads as under:- 3. That pursuant thereto, the Respondent Bank has agreed to the following terms and conditions in favour of the Petitioners: a) Waiver of foreclosure charges considering that the loan facility is an individual facility and the Petitioners shall be entitled to close the loan account at any point of time without levy of foreclosure charges; b) Waiver of the requirement of mai...
Amit Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 299/2026 AMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner with his counsel Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Adv.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State along with SI Rajender. R-2 with her counselCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 26.05.2026 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR bearing no. 168/2018, registered at Police Station Nangloi, Outer Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and the proceedings emanating therefore, on the basis of a settlement. 2. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court in person and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Nangloi, Outer Delhi. 3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the marriage be...
Shalabh Jasoria vs Municipal Corporation Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1570/2026 with CM APPL. 7633/2026, CM APPL.SHALABH JASORIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Amogh Kumar Singh and Mr. Pratik Malik, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. Attrey Gupta, Mr. Aman Bidhuri and Ms. Urvashi Jain, Advocates for R-1/MCD. Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, SPC for R-2/UoI. Mr. Parveen Sonthey, Advocate forR-3.Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate forSHO.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 26.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondents no.1 and 2 to demolish the unauthorised construction being carried out by the private respondents no.3 and 4 on the Terrace Floor of Property No. 10/62, Park Area, Gangeshwar Dham Marg, New Delhi (hereinafter subject property).2. It is stated that the petitioner resides on the First Floor of the subjectW.P.(C) 1570/2026 Page 1 of 3property, whereas the respondents no...
Dr Ramesh Chander Munjal & Ors. vs Dr Suraj Munjal & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 22/2021 DR RAMESH CHANDER MUNJAL & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Ms. Aakanksha Nehra, Mr. Abul Hasan R. And Ms. Himangi Arora, Advocates.versusDR SURAJ MUNJAL & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Anshuman Upadhyay, Advocate for D-1 to D-6. Mr. Shreyas Mehrotra and Mr. Manish Kr. Mishra, Advocates for D-7.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 26.05.2026 I.A. 14807/2026 (U/o XXIII Rule 1)1. This is an application filed by the plaintiffs under Order XXIII Rule 1read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which is also supported by the affidavits of all the defendants.2. Learned counsel for the parties state that the inter se disputes have beensettled amicably. The terms of settlement have been reduced into writing vide the Family Settlement Deed dated 19.02.2026. The terms of settlement are specifically mentioned in sub para (a) to para (z). The said terms o...
Vikas vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 590/2026VIKAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate (throughVC)versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.05.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant throughvideo-conferencing seeks permission to withdraw the present application.2. In view of the above, the present application stands dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty to file afresh before the learned Trial Court concerned.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JMAY 26, 2026/vcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:03:07...
Mr Manishpuri vs Ombudsman Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1839/2026MR MANISHPURI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Manjani, Mr. Uday Mathur, Advs.versusOMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Ms. Aditi Desai, Advs. for R-1/RBI Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Mr. Aditya Prasad, Advs. for R-2/HDFC BankCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 26.05.2026CM APPL. 37009/20261. This is an application filed under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 seekingearly hearing of the main petition on the ground that the account of the petitioner has been frozen and due to this reason the petitioner is undergoing acute financial hardship.2. For the reasons stated in the application, issue notice to therespondents.3. Mr. Mehrotra, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of therespondent No.1 and Mr. Sinha, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.2.4. The present application is allowed and the next date of hearing...
Vivek Kumar Constable vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1968/2025VIVEK KUMAR CONSTABLE.....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Saket (SPCG), Mr. Manish Madhukar, Mr. Abhigyan, Ms. Reya Paul, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 26.05.20261. There is no representation on behalf of Petitioner.2. Through this Writ Petition, the Petitioner prays for thefollowing relief :(i) Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing of letter datedSeptember 2024 whereby Respondents rejected the Petitioner's pension proposal on grounds of disability; and(ii) Issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents tothereby grant him with disability pension and all consequential benefits as per rules; and iii) Pass any such orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the light of above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case.3. Today, learned counsel representing the...
Yogeshver Dayal Sharma vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
$~29* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1139/2026YOGESHVER DAYAL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bahar U Barqi, Mr Vikram Kumar, Mr Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Maroof Ahmad, Advs.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP SI Pankaj Kumar, PS BhajanpuraCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 17091/2026 (early hearing) This is an application seeking early hearing of the petition, which is scheduled to be listed on 10.08.2026. For the reasons stated therein and with the consent of Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the application is allowed, and CRL.M.C. 1139/2026 is taken up for hearing. The application is disposed of.CRL.M.C. 1139/20261. By way of this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya NagarikSuraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of the criminal proceedings, arising from FIR No. 912/2015 dated 27.08.2015, registered at Police Station B...
Sushee Infra and Mining-Jsc Purpetruboprovodstroy (Jv) vs National Hig ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 73/2026 SUSHEE INFRA AND MINING-JSC PURPETRUBOPROVODSTROY (JV) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinam Gupta, Ms. Pragya Narayan and Mr. Nabam Yama, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manu Bajaj and Ms. Parul Sardana, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 26.05.2026 I.A. 15218/2026 (by petitioner under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC seeking withdrawal of its application under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996)1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner seekingwithdrawal of the captioned petition.2. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, theapplication is allowed and disposed of.O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 73/20263. In view of the order passed above, the present petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.4. The next date of hearing i.e. 13.08.2026 stands cancelled.5. Order dasti under t...
Visage Lines Personal Care Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner o ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-26-2026
$~4 & 20* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6230/2026 CM APPL. 30523/2026 CM APPL. 30524/2026CM APPL. 30525/2026+ W.P.(C) 2334/2026 CM APPL. 11278/2026 CM APPL. 11279/2026CM APPL. 11280/2026VISAGE LINES PERSONAL CARE PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, Mr. Rohit Gupta and Mr. Devvrat Tiwari, Advs.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 25(1),DELHI & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 26.05.20261. Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, learned counsel for the petitioner submittedthat the petitioner has received an order dated 20.05.2026 passed under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-7, which redresses the petitioners grievance. He prays that the present Writ petitions be allowed to be withdrawn.2. Permission is granted.3. The Writ petitions are dismissed as wit...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »