Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Imperia Structures Limited vs Chandra Prabha Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1267/2026, CM APPL. 37588/2026, CM APPL. 37589/2026 &CM APPL. 37590/2026 IMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Archit Upadhyay, Mr. Vaibhav Shahi, Mr. Shubham Mishra, Mr. Nikhil Kumar and Mr. Ayush Kumar Singh, Advs.versusCHANDRA PRABHA SHARMA &ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all his rights and contentions as raised in the present petition before the State Commission.3. Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, and all the rights and contentions of the parties are left open. Pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMA...
M/S the Sant Namdev Educational Society vs Hero Fincorp Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 235/2026 & I.A. 15617/2026 (EX.) M/S THE SANT NAMDEV EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Mr. Kunal Sachdeva, Advocates.versusHERO FINCORP LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 29.05.20261. The present Petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeks certain ad interim measures.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner afterarguing some time and realizing that the Court is not inclined to grant the reliefs as sought for, seeks the liberty of this Court to withdraw the present Petition.3. Liberty, as sought for, is granted.4. The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.MAY 29, 2026/nd/dj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order...
M/S Mayur Bagh Cghs Pvt Ltd vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7930/2026 M/S MAYUR BAGH CGHS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neerav Anand, Adv.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Shagun Sabharwal, Ms. Anamika Tyagi, Ms. Laqshyaa Saluja, Advs. for R1.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- M/s Mayur BaghCooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. (hereinafter, Society) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Respondents to expeditiously hear and dispose of the recovery proceedings against Respondent No. 3 to 8 before the Assistant Registrar, Section IV.3. The case of the Society is that the recovery proceedings are not being heard in an expeditious manner. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner Society submits that many representat...
M/S Pasupati Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited vs Parvesh Gulati & Or ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1278/2026 & CM APPL. 37717/2026 M/S PASUPATI SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swayam S. Pali, Advocate.versusPARVESH GULATI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order before the appropriate forum.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 29, 2026/nd/ik This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code sh...
M/S Arss Infrastructure Projects Limited vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 424/2026 M/S ARSS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shubham Jain, Advocate.versusRAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Ms. Harshita Singh and Ms. Shivpriya, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 29.05.2026 I.A. 15450/2026 (under Section 151 CPC for exemption by the petitioner)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 424/20263. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.4. Mr. Shubham Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner submits that in the prayer clause, inadvertently the extension has been sought for a period of six weeks from 28.01.2026 till 10.03.2026. Actually, the extension ought to have been sought for six months w.e.f 01....
Sushil Kumar vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7892/2026, CM APPL. 38100/2026, CM APPL. SUSHIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh and Ms. Shriya Sharma, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Panwar, SPC with Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, GP and Mr. Sahej Sawhney, Advs. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advs. for CVCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 29.05.2026C.HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Mr. Sinha, after some hearing, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. The leave is granted as aforesaid.2. However, we make it clear that the CVO in the office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks should dispassionately and independently apply his mind to the material provided by the petitioner.3. We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the W.P.(C) 7892/2026 Page 1 of 2 allegations. Liberty shall sta...
Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7854/2026, CM APPL. 38024/2026 BHARTIYA KHADYA NIGAM KARAMCHARI SANGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kriti Ranjan, Mr. Vishal and Mr. Abhishek Ranjan, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhry, CGSC along with Mr. Rahul Mourya, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. Mr. Ajit Pudussery and Mr. Ashutosh Bamezai, Advocates for R-5 and R-6 (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.20261. It transpires during the course of hearing that the concerned CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court is seized of ID No.8/2026 initiated by the same petitioner pertaining to the same issue. A claim statement has been filed in the said proceedings and currently, the said Tribunal is seized of the matter.2. In the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. The petitioner is relegated to pursue the proceedings initiated by it before the concerned CG...
Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd vs Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 422/2026 MEDIPOL PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr Samman Vardhan Gautam Advocate, Ms Khushi Sharma Advocate, Mr Priyam tiwari Advocate, Ms Anshika Priyadarshini AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Dr. Vijendra Singh Mahndiyan, CGSCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 29.05.20261. The present Petition under Section 29A(3) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.2. Material on record indicates that the Arbitral Tribunal was constitutedby this Court vide Order dated 02.06.2025 in OMP(I)(COMM) No. have yet not been completed. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the procedural Order dated 04.04.2026 wherein the learned Arbitrator has noted that the six months period within which the pleadings were to be completed ...
M/S Pele Khezhie vs National Highways and Infrastructure Development C ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 439/2026 M/S PELE KHEZHIE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Amrita Panda, Mr. Piyush Pandit, AdvocatesversusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Chandra, Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr. Durga Dass Vashist, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 29.05.2026 I.A. 15713/2026 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 439/20261. The present Petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.2. Material on record indicates that an Arbitral Tribunal was constitutedby this Court vide Order dated 21.08.2023 in ARB.P.840/2023. The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal was extended by way of mutual consent by the parties and the extended period came to an end on 17.10.2025. This Court vide Order dat...
Card Expertise India Private Limited vs Eqx Analytics Private Limited ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1000/2026 & I.A. 15682/2026 (EX.) CARD EXPERTISE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.V. Ramana Rao, Advocate.versusEQX ANALYTICS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Nemo.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 29.05.20261. The present Petition, filed under Sections 11(5) & 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act], seeks the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes inter se the parties arising out of Agreement dated 23.10.2021 and subsequent Agreement dated 01.11.2022 [Agreements], as executed between the parties.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, after advancing some arguments, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to take such steps as permissible under law.3. Leave and liberty, as sought for, are granted.4. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pend...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »