Delhi Orders Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Siddharth Kapur & Ors. vs Land an Development Office
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1013/2026 SIDDHARTH KAPUR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Ms. Supriya Sharma, Ms. Muskan Gupta and Ms. Eccha Shukla, Advs.versusLAND AN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.05.20261. The Court does not find any reason to initiate the contempt proceedings, in absence of there being an explicit direction of the Court to finalize SOP. However, delay has been alleged by the petitioner.2. Whether the delay is deliberate or bona fide shall be considered on the next date of hearing in the main writ petition.3. With this observation, petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 29, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:11:23...
Varsha Rani & Ors. vs University of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7736/2026 & CM.APPL. 37381-82/2026 VARSHA RANI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Umesh Kumar, Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Gond, Advs.versusUNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs. for R1-5/ University of Delhi Mr. Preet Pal, Ms. Medha Sharma, Ms. Pooja, Ms. Simran Gupta, Mr. Gaurav, Advs. for R-6/ BCICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- a) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Certiorari and/or Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing the illegal, arbitrary notification dated 14.05.2026 issued by the Respondent Faculty of Law, whereby the Petitioners and other similarly situated students have been debarred from appearing in the M...
Dinesh Prakash vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7827/2026 DINESH PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Kumar Gautam and Ms. Niharika Kashyap, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.05.20261. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. AMIT BANSAL, J MAY 29, 2026 dsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:11:59...
Ex Cpo Jitendra Singh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7759/2026 EX CPO JITENDRA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Vaxish, Mr.Sushmit Chauhan, Mr.Anant Attri, Advocates along with (Petitioner in person).versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.05.20261. An application for early hearing of the case has been dismissedby the learned Armed Forces Tribunal on 20.01.2026, on the ground that applications against the dismissal of employee from services have been pending before the Tribunal from the year 2011 whereas the present Petitioner was dismissed from services only on 28.11.2022.2. Considering the same, it would not be appropriate to issue any directions to the learned Armed Forces Tribunal to take up the case out of its turn.3. However, the Petitioner may revive his request after a period of one year, by filing appropriat...
Smt Asha Gandhi and Another vs Shri Rajiv Gambhir
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 995/2026 SMT ASHA GANDHI AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra and Ms. Prachi Dutta, Advs.versusSHRI RAJIV GAMBHIR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kartik Bhardwaj, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.05.2026 CM APPL. 37596/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 995/20263. After some hearing, it is agreed that the petitioner would carry out the necessary water proofing treatment/plastering on the petitioners side of the property by engaging a vendor at its cost.4. It is agreed that if any work is required to be carried out on therespondents side of the property, the petitioner shall personally intimate the respondent, and the parties would thereafter cooperate to ensure that the water proofing is functional and complete in all respects on both sides of the concerned property.5. It is made clear that neither will the respondent...
Anuj Goel & Ors. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4245/2026 ANUJ GOEL & ORS. ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pramod Kant Saxena, Adv.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State along with SI Neetu. Mr. Gaurav Kakar and Mr. Lakshay Raheja, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.05.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 138/2024, registered at Police Station Chitranjan Park, New Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and the proceedings emanating therefrom.2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present through videoconferencing before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Chitranjan Park, New Delhi.3. Brief facts of the present case are that the marriage between petiti...
Sks Infra Projects Private Limited vs Ministry of Road Transport and H ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 226/2026 & I.A. 15136/2026 SKS INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Varma, Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Mr. Ayush Srivastava, Ms. Aditi Pundhir, AdvocatesversusMINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kartik Bhatnagar, CGSC with Mr. Manish Rawat, GP, Ms. Aditi Bhatt, Ms. Astha Prasad, Mr. Dinesh Vishwakarma, Advocates for R-1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 29.05.20261. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that in view of thefact that conciliation proceedings have started between the Petitioner and the Respondents, the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to institute a fresh petition in case need arises in future.2. Permission and liberty, as sought for, are granted.3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with pending application(s), if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J MAY 29,...
Mohd. Laieq vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7875/2026, CM APPL. 38067/2026 & CM APPL. MOHD. LAIEQ .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Mr. I. Ahmed and Ms. Vanessa Singh, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal and Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocates for MCD (through VC). Mr. Saroj Bidawat, SPC with Mr. Himanshu Chauhan (GP), Advocate for R-2/SHO.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent no.1/MCD to take action against the unauthorized construction being carried out by respondent no.3 at property bearing no.9024, Ram Bagh Road, Pul Bangash, Azad Market, Delhi-110006 (hereinafter subject property).2. Photographs have been filed along with the petition showing the unauthorized construction.3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD, on advance notice, submits that a show-cause notice has already ...
Larsen and Toubro Limited vs National High-Speed Rail Corporation Limi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 440/2026 & I.A. No. 15724/2026 LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gunjan Chhabra, Mr. Devesh Matta, Ms. Shriya Mishra, Advocates Mob: +91-9873278768 Email: gunjan.chhabra@mrp- advisory.comversusNATIONAL HIGH-SPEED RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Mr. Aubert Sebastian and Mr. Shreyash Sharma, Advocates Email: [email protected]:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 29.05.20261. The present petition has been filed jointly by the petitioner and therespondent under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal, for rendering the Arbitral Award, for a period of six months with effect from 17th June, 2026 till 16th December, 2026.2. It is submitted that the matter is listed for final arguments on 06th June, 2026 and 07th June, 2026. Howev...
Meetu Singh Rathoud vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7830/2026, CM APPL. 37983/2026 & CM APPL. MEETU SINGH RATHOUD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshat Kumar, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. for all Respondents. Mr. Ajay Pal, Law Officer CRPF, INSP Athurv and Mr. Inder Pal CRPFCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.05.2026 CM APPL. 37984/2026 [exemption from filing certified copies of annexures/ dim annexures/ margins/ true typed copy etc.]1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7830/2026, CM APPL. 37983/2026 & CM APPL.3. The Petitioner was dismissed from service after Departmental Enquiry on 08.05.2018. Appeal, revision and representation filed by the Petitioner were dismissed on 20.12.2018, 27.06.2019 and 04.12.2020 respectively.4. If the Petitioner was to file a suit for challenging his dismissal in the year 2026, the same w...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »