Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs Eunice Lalnunmawii Chawngthu vs Union Ministry of Home Through Jt. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1416/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13597/2026 MRS EUNICE LALNUNMAWII CHAWNGTHU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik and Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocates with petitioner in- person.versusUNION MINISTRY OF HOME THROUGH JT. SECRETARY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Dubey, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026 On a perusal of the petition it is evident that the grievances of the petitioner arise from omissions on the part of the police and other authorities in district Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. In view thereof, this court is of the view that it does not have territorial jurisdiction over the matter. The petition is accordingly disposed-of, granting to the petitioner liberty to approach the authorities with competent territorial jurisdiction, as may be permissible, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed-of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.A...
May and Baker Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Satya Paul (Sole Proprietor o ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + FAO 137/2026 MAY AND BAKER PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Dr. Ishaan S. Sharma, Ms. Shambavi Sharma, Mr. Ayush, Mr. Mukun Ranjan and Mr. Shubham Shukla, AdvocatesversusSATYA PAUL (SOLE PROPRIETOR OF RUNOS HEALTHCARE) .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 30.04.2026 CM APPL. 29233/20261. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. FAO 137/20261. By way of the present appeal, the appellant seeks to assail the orderdated 16.03.2026, whereby the application filed by the appellant underOrder IX Rule 9 CPC came to be dismissed.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the suit, upon beinginstituted, was first listed before the Trial Court on 04.06.2025, when the learned Presiding Officer was on leave. The matter was thereafter listed on 19.07.2025, when the Trial Court granted an opportunity to cure defects andthe matter was adjourned to 18.09...
Wings Enterprises Prop Manish Kumar vs Commissioner of Central Goods a ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5947/2026 & CM APPL. 29201/2026 WINGS ENTERPRISES PROP MANISH KUMAR ....Petitioner Through: Mr. rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ramanand Roy and Mr. Mayank Kouts, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.04.20261. There is a statutory alternate remedy of appeal available to the petitioner.2. We see no reason as to why we should exercise the extraordinaryjurisdiction in the present petition, particularly when the Show Cause Notice refers to the specific provision which empowers the respondents to deal with the issue as regards retrospective cancellation of registration.3. Apart from above, the revocation of cancellation of registration is also dealt with through a speaking order.4. That being so, we dismiss the petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to...
Vinod Kumar Singh and Ors vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5935/2026 VINOD KUMAR SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. KM Pratima Devi, Ms. Preeti Kumari Tiwari, Mr. Mukund Sharan , Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Advs. with Mr. Ajay Pal, Law Officer, Inspector Athurv and Mr. Inderpal, CRPF. Mr. Arun Arvindo, SPC with Mr. Yash Tyagi, GP with Mr. Archit Sharma, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.04.20261. After arguing for some time, learned counsel representing the Petitioners seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present Petition in order to file a representation on the administrative side.2. Ordered accordingly.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.APRIL 30, 2026 jai/pal This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown ...
Rishika Goyal vs Kushal Mittal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 766/2026, CM APPL. 29128/2026 RISHIKA GOYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Yadav, Advocate.versusKUSHAL MITTAL .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilfuldisobedience/ non-compliance with the directions contained in the order dated 23.02.2026 passed by the learned Family Court, Rohini Courts, Delhi in HMA No. 2647/2024 titled as Kushal Mittal Vs. Rishika Goyal.2. It is submitted that the matrimonial proceedings, including anapplication under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking maintenance, are pending before the learned Family Court. According to the petitioner, the respondent/ husband has deliberately concealed his true income and financial position, despite the disclosure requirements laid down by the Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha, (2021) 2 SCC 324.3. C...
Harbir Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5896/2026 HARBIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Tyagi, Mr. Sourav R. and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Prakash, SC with Ms. Varsha Arya, Advocate for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been instituted under Article 226 of theConstitution of India by the Petitioner, who claims to be a law-abiding citizen and seeks intervention of this Court alleging a grave fraud on the Constitution of India, the reservation policy, and the public exchequer. The gravamen of the petition is that Respondent No. 3, who is the brother of the Petitioner, secured appointment as a teacher with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) in the year 1996-97 against a post reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates on the strength of a fabricated Scheduled Caste certificate. According to the Petitioner, the ...
Shankar Yadav @ Munna vs the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1672/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13479/2026 SHANKAR YADAV @ MUNNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pravesh Kumar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP with ASI Satish Chand and SI Rajender Signh, PS Shastri Park.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.04.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 103/2019 of Police Station Shastri Park for offence under Section 392/394/397/34/174A IPC.2. Broadly speaking, the accused/applicant was on bail in the present case but he fled and after three years, he was declared proclaimed offender. The accused/applicant was arrested about 11 months back.3. Learned APP for State assisted by IO/ASI Satish Chand submits that the accused/applicant is involved in 11 more cases.4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant fairly admits that he has been convicted in three cases.5. In the above backdrop, learned counsel for a...
Saveel & Ors. vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3309/2026 SAVEEL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Kundu, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht, Ms. Ankita Bisht and Mr. Rohit Chaprana, Advocates with SI Achal. Mr. Jahangir Ahmad, Mr. Shahbaz Ahmad Mr Abdul Kalam Ansari Ms Ruksharul Nissa, Advocates for R-2 and R-2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13455/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13456/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3309/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 499/2017, registered at Police Station Jamia Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC') and all con...
Ajay Kumar vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1681/2026, CRL.M.A. 13531/2026, CRL.M.(BAIL) 908/2026 AJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akash Kumar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP. SI Vinod Kumar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 263/2025 dated 24.04.2025 registered at Police Station Palam Village under Section 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.2. At the very outset, Mr. Akash Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application.3. The bail application, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn.4. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of th...
M/S Labo Tek Through Its Partner Shri Gurpreet Singh Bakshi vs Union o ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~77 & 84* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5928/2026 + W.P.(C) 5944/2026 M/S LABO TEK THROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI GURPREET SINGH BAKSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Mehak Dhiman and Ms. Ritika Verma, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar (CGSC) and Mr. Rajat Mohan Dwivedi (GP), Mr. Shivom Dubey and Mrs. Yash Singh, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Vipul Agrawal SSC for R-2 & 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the refund ofRs.15,06,997/- was due and payable to the petitioner firm (M/s Lobo Tek, PAN No. AAEFL9553B) for the Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12 for which the respondents have generated refund order but because of the change in PAN number, banking account number and the name of the partners after the reconstitution of firm, the same could not reach the petitioner.2. He submitted that th...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »