Saveel & Ors. vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263530

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1263530
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma
Decided On: Apr 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL.M.C./3309/2026
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saveel & Ors.

Advocate Mr. Himanshu Kundu

Respondent

State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, Mr. Gaurav Bisht, Ms. Ankita Bisht, Mr. Rohit Chaprana, Mr. Jahangir Ahmad, Mr. Shahbaz Ahmad Mr Abdul Kalam, Ms. Ruksharul Nissa

Excerpt

.....learned app accepts notice on behalf of the state.5. all the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this court and have been identified by their counsel and investigating officer (io) concerned, police station, jamia nagar, delhi.6. brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no. 2 was solemnized at delhi on 01.03.2016, in accordance with muslim rites and ceremonies. it is stated that due to various differences, disputes and issues had arisen between the petitioners and the respondent no. 2. upon the complaint by respondent no. 2, the present fir came to be registered against the petitioners. it is stated that with intervention of the family and friends, the parties have now amicably settled their dispute vide divorce deed/talaqnama dated 11.09.2019.7. on a query made by this court, respondent no. 2 who has beenidentified by the io, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. it is also stated that she has already received the amount as per the said divorce deed. therefore, she has no objection if the present fir is quashed.8. in view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved theirdifferences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. it would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned fir and the proceedings pursuant thereto. there is no legal impediment in quashing the fir in question.9. accordingly, fir bearing no. 499/2017, registered at police stationjamia nagar, delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under sections 498a/406/34/506 of ipc and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.10. the petition stands disposed of.11. the order be uploaded on the website forthwith. dr. swarana kanta sharma, j april 30, 2026/vc/r

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 3309/2026 SAVEEL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Kundu, Advocate with petitioners in person.
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht, Ms. Ankita Bisht and Mr. Rohit Chaprana, Advocates with SI Achal. Mr. Jahangir Ahmad, Mr. Shahbaz Ahmad Mr Abdul Kalam Ansari Ms Ruksharul Nissa, Advocates for R-2 and R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

ORDER

% 30.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13455/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13456/2026 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3309/2026

3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the

FIR bearing No. 499/2017, registered at Police Station Jamia Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC') and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.

4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

5. All the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Jamia Nagar, Delhi.

6. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no.

1 and the respondent no. 2 was solemnized at Delhi on 01.03.2016, in accordance with Muslim rites and ceremonies. It is stated that due to various differences, disputes and issues had arisen between the petitioners and the respondent no. 2. Upon the complaint by respondent no. 2, the present FIR came to be registered against the petitioners. It is stated that with intervention of the family and friends, the parties have now amicably settled their dispute vide Divorce Deed/Talaqnama dated 11.09.2019.

7. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been

identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated that she has already received the amount as per the said Divorce Deed. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

8. In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their

differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

9. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 499/2017, registered at Police Station

Jamia Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34/506 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition stands disposed of.

11. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 30, 2026/vc/r

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Saveel & Ors. vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma