Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
All Dwarka Resident Federation Through Its Vice President Ms. Kavita C ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5869/2026 ALL DWARKA RESIDENT FEDERATION THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MS. KAVITA CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aakash Dahiya, Mr. Shubham Bhushan, Mr. Karan Gautam, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.2026 CM APPL. 28842/20261. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 5869/20263. The petitioner seeks for implementation of the order passed by theSub Divisional Magistrate (Headquarter) District Magistrate (South West).4. If the petitioner has any grievance with respect to non implementationof the said order, he shall always be at liberty to approach the higher authorities such as the District Magistrate or the Divisional Commissioner.5. There cannot be a direction by the High Court to implement the orderpassed by the Sub Divisional...
Ankit Rana vs Rashmi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 978/2026 ANKIT RANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Madan, Advocate.versusRASHMI .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 28713/2026 (Exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.CM(M) 978/20263. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeksthe following prayers: a) Allow the present Petition; b) Direct Expeditious disposal of the HMA/1158/18 currently pending the Court of Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. PJFC, North Rohini Court, Delhi in a time bound manner; c) Pass any other appropriate order as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the Petitioner.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the presentpetition with liberty to file appropriate application before the learned Fa...
Nb Ris Sharwan Singh vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5831/2026 and CM APPL. 28664/2026 NB RIS SHARWAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Janesh Kumar, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC along with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Mr. Ankit Khatri, Advs. and Lt. Col. A. S. Thind/PBG and Major Anish Muralidhar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. At the outset, learned counsel representing the Respondentssubmits that the Petitioner is required to file an application before the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Tribunal]. It is further submitted that the relief sought in prayer c of the Petition is maintainable before the Tribunal and consequently, prayer b can also be considered by the Tribunal.2. At this stage, learned counsel representing the Petitioner seeksand is granted permission of this Court ...
Amit Kumar Rai vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5845/2026, CM APPL. 28676/2026 & CM APPL. AMIT KUMAR RAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akramur Rahman and Mr. Hanzala Ahmed, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Additional standing counsel for MCD with Mr. Yash Agrawal, Mr. Sparsh Ruhela and Ms. Sanjana Chib, Advocates for R-1/MCD. Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC with Ms. Monica Batra, Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu, Mr. Ravikant Kumar and Mr. Vishal Sejwal, Advocates for R-4/DDA. Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC with Mr. Prajesh Vikram, Advocate for R-3 (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent-MCD to take action against respondent no.5 for carrying out unauthorized construction at Flat No.174-C, DDA Janta Flats Shahpur Jat, New Delhi (subject property). W.P.(C) 5845/2026 Page 1 of 22. Counsel appearing on behalf of the...
Raunaq Singh Chandhok vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5818/2026, CM APPL. 28633/2026 & CM APPL. 28634/2026 RAUNAQ SINGH CHANDHOK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Maittri & Ms. Radhika Kushaldas, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr.Sanjeev Menon, JSC & Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSC and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.2. Permission granted.3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications are also disposed of. DINESH MEHTA, J VINOD KUMAR, J APRIL 29, 2026/kkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:51:09...
Ssj Mining Pvt Ltd vs Hindustan Zinc Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 360/2026 SSJ MINING PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Ms. Kritika Bhardwaj & Mr. Vipul Singh, Advs.versusHINDUSTAN ZINC LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Uday N. Tiwary, Mr. Akshat Tiwary & Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 29.04.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J APRIL 29, 2026 JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the...
Sachin Jain vs ICICI Bank Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 753/2026 SACHIN JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr Kshitiz Jain, Mr Ayush Singhal, Mr Rohan Chandra, Advs.versusICICI BANK LTD ....Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Parekh, Adv., Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.04.20261. This is a contempt petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India seeking contempt proceedings against the respondent bank for wilful disobedience of the directions passed in the Order dated 25.03.2026 in W.P. (C) 3887/2026.2. For the reasons stated in the petition, issue notice.3. It is stated that despite the order, credit card dues were deducted from the account of the petitioner on 30.03.2026 and 08.04.2026.4. Mr. Parikh, learned counsel appearing on advance notice, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and states that the same occurred due to an inadvertent error and the correction was made im...
Suleman Husain vs Bar Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5843/2026 SULEMAN HUSAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiva Tiwari, Mr. Asif Iqbal Advocates.versusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. The complaint itself has emanated from the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. It is the said decision which was taken by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh under challenge before the Bar Council of India.2. The Court thus finds that the material integral and essential part ofcause of action has arisen outside the jurisdiction of this Court, merely on the ground that the appeal is pending before the Bar Council of India should not be the sole factor to invoke the jurisdiction.3. The petitioner at this stage seeks liberty to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court. The liberty stands granted.4. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR K...
Mahant Vinod Kumar Sharma & Ors. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3304/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13407/2026 MAHANT VINOD KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. D.S. Kohil, Mr. Yash Luthra, Mr. Yash Kadyan, Mr. Mihir and Mr. Sachin Kumar, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Anita Bisht, Advocates Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13408/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3304/20263. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 142/2013, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 147/148/323/380/452/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).4. Thereafter, chargesheet was filed on 02.08.2013, and Section 411 of IPC was added....
Manish vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~77 & 82* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1652/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13383/2026 MANISH Through: Mr. Mehul Sharma, Mr. Nagesh Sharma, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Tarun Raj and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Manu, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1643/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13266/2026 RAJU SHAH Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANRCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Both the applicants i.e. Manish and Raju Shah seek regular bail in the ongoing murder trial related to case in FIR No.0236/2016 dated 20.05.2016, registered at P.S. Khyala. BAIL APPLN. 1652/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 1643/2026 12. The prime-most contention raised by the applicants herein is that thereis long incarceration period as they both are behind the bars for more than seven years. It is submitted that all the material public witnesses, including eye-witnesses, have been examined, and since there are still 12 witnesses remaining to be examined, there is no li...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »