Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Altmas vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 708/2026 ALTMAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alaminr, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Ankita Bisht, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, at this stage,does not press the present application and seeks permission to withdraw the same.2. In view of the above, the present application stands dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty to file afresh.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/vc/gjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 11:43:39...
Ht Happy Tummy Private Limited vs Shri Ajit Kumar Chadha and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~21 and 22* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 42/2024 and CM APPL. 6911/2024 HT HAPPY TUMMY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSHRI AJIT KUMAR CHADHA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None+ FAO 43/2024 and CM APPL. 6922/2024 HT HAPPY TUMMY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: NoneversusNARESH KUMAR CHADHA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 29.04.20261. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellants for the last threedates of hearing. Even today, the appellants remained unrepresented.2. In view of the above, the present appeals are dismissed in default fornon-prosecution alongwith the pending applications.MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, JAPRIL 29, 2026naThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:07:12...
Umesh Kumar vs State of Gnct Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 592/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5669/2026 UMESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSTATE OF GNCT DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Raug Ansari, ASC with W/SI Suman, PS JagatpuriCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 29.04.20261. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 31/2026 of PS Jagatpuri foroffence under Section 123/64(1)/115(2) of BNS.2. None appears for petitioner. On last two consecutive dates also noneappeared for petitioner.3. The petition and the accompanying application are dismissed indefault.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 13:45:03...
Manthan Alias Manthan Sonkar vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 642/2026 MANTHAN ALIAS MANTHAN SONKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar Trar and Mr. N.P. Singh, Advocate.versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Vibhu Sharma, PS Subzi Mandi.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 4922/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.BAIL APPLN. 642/20261. The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 597/2025 dated05.12.2025, registered at P.S. Subzi Mandi, Delhi, under Sections2. As per the brief allegations appearing in the FIR, the police team hadsome tip-off regarding some illegal arms concealed near one akhara and when the team reached there, they were obstructed by several persons.3. Applicant herein is also one of those persons.4. His one co-accused had even taken out some pistol and threatened thepolice team.5. Since a big crowd collecte...
Jitendra vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 624/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13415/2026 JITENDRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Deo with Mr. Amit Kumar and Ms. Yakshi Kataria, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with W/SI Kumari Neeraj and ASI Laxmi, PS Palam Village.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.147/2021 dated14.04.2021 registered at P.S. Palam Village for commission of offences under Section 365/376D/377/328/34 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the case is motivated andFIR was registered with inordinate delay which has not been explained. She submits that prosecutrix had a malicious intent and the complaint is with the objective to fix her in-laws, and that it is a fit case where applicant should be enlarged on bail, particularly, appreciating the fact that he is behind bar...
Vineet Jain & Anr. vs Registrar of Companies & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1439/2026 VINEET JAIN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Counsel for petitioners (appearance not given).versusREGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 29.04.20261. On being pointed out the nature of the prayer clause, counsel forpetitioners on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this petition.2. As requested, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/ryThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 12:30:27...
Smt Santra Devi and Anr vs Sh Naveen Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.R.P. 49/2026 & CM APPL. 12097/2026 CM APPL. 12098/2026 SMT SANTRA DEVI AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kr. Solanki, Adv.versusSH NAVEEN KUMAR .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 29.04.20261. Counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition.2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. Pending applications (if any) are rendered infructuous.4. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.ANISH DAYAL, JAPRIL 29, 2026/MK/zbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 11:57:25...
Kedar Singh @ Suraj vs the State Govt Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 853/2026 KEDAR SINGH @ SURAJ .....Applicant Through: Mr. Rohit Boora, Ms. Swati Rathee, Ms. Prem Sood, Ms. Chetishtha Malik, Ms. Priyadarshani and Mr. Sachin, Advs.versusTHE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocates with SI Preeti Dhankar, PS: Budh Vihar Mr. Sarthak Karol, SC with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadhauria, Ms. Tanishka Pawar, Advs. for ComplainantCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 482 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.509/2025 dated 29.11.2025 registered at PS.: Budh Vihar, New Delhi under Sections 74/75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.2. Considering the assertions made...
Seema Fatima vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporati ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3294/2022, CM APPL. 9565/2022SEEMA FATIMA.....Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Mr. Neelakash Sharma and Mr. Vikalp Chandela, Advocates.versusDELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION.....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Amaan Khan and Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. In deference to the observations made by the Court, Mr. RajivKumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 152 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.2. He, however, submits that in case the grievance is not fully mitigatedhe may further granted liberty to take appropriate recourse.3. The submissions made by Mr. Rajiv Kumar, learned counselappearing on behalf of the petitioner seems to be reasonable, accordingly,the petiti...
Vivek Malhotra vs Shilpa Sood
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 74/2026, CM APPL. 14521/2026, CM APPL.VIVEK MALHOTRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vaibhav Vatts, DHCLSC (through VC) Mr. Vivek Malhotra, Appellant in person.versusSHILPA SOOD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned Counsel, Mr. Vaibhav Vatts, appointed by the Delhi HighCourt Legal Services Committee for the appellant, is discharged, as the appellant wishes to argue his case in person.2. Accordingly, Mr. Vaibhav Vatts, Advocate, stands discharged from thepresent matter.3. Mr. Vivek Malhotra, appellant herein, appears in person and states thathe has no grievance in case his suit under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act is decided uninfluenced by any other independent proceedings pending between the parties before any other court.4. We entrust the learned Family Court to proceed to decide the su...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »